PDA

View Full Version : Internal wave- AC190, Jan 10/08


YHZChick
22nd Oct 2009, 14:12
Interesting article.


October 18, 2009
Scientists says Air Canada flight that plunged, injuring 10, hit wave of air

John Cotter, THE CANADIAN PRESS
EDMONTON - Experts say an Air Canada jet that plunged more than 1,000 metres without warning last year, injuring 10 people, rose up and then dove down a massive invisible wall of smooth air called an internal wave.
The official cause of what happened to Flight AC-190 on Jan. 10, 2008, over a rugged area near the B.C.-Washington border is still under investigation by the Canadian Transportation Safety Board.
The internal wave transformed the routine flight from Victoria to Toronto into a terrifying roller-coaster ride that violently tossed passengers, crew and heavy drink carts around the cabin before the pilot made an emergency landing in Calgary.
Scientists not connected with the official investigation say the Airbus 319 hit an atmospheric phenomenon that can loom up out of nowhere and doesn't show up on weather or aircraft radar.
"This Air Canada plane was just unfortunate enough to encounter one of these waves," said Bruce Sutherland, a University of Alberta professor of earth and atmospheric sciences.
"This isn't something that occurs all the time. You are just really unlucky if you happen to capture a wave that has gotten to this large amplitude and has not yet broken. If a plane showed up behind them 10 minutes later, that wave would have overturned and broken and that plane would have encountered lots of turbulence, but they wouldn't have been carried up a thousand feet in seconds."
Internal waves occur in the atmosphere and the ocean. They're not unlike the disturbance caused when water flows over a rock. In the case of the atmosphere, wind blows over a mountain and creates a wave of air behind it that flows both up and down.
The size of the wave depends on how fast the air is flowing and on how much the air temperature changes with altitude.
"The wind is always blowing over the mountains. But every now and then it is just right to create these very large amplitude waves," Sutherland said. In some cases, such waves can be 20 kilometres wide.
Immediately following the Air Canada jet's troubles there were unconfirmed reports that the plane with 88 people aboard might have encountered "wake turbulence" - flying through the wake of a passing aircraft, perhaps a U.S. military stealth jet or a heavily loaded 747 cargo aircraft. There was also speculation about internal waves.
Canadian investigators at the time would only say there was a high probability the sudden plunge was caused by an external force.
Thomas Peacock, an expert on internal waves at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said he also believes the Air Canada jet hit an internal wave.
Peacock said he is working on a documentary on ocean and atmospheric internal waves for the Discovery Science Channel and hopes to interview the Air Canada pilots for the program that is to be broadcast next year.
"The Air Canada flight encountered a particularly strong internal wave which is why it had such a dramatic effect," he said. "It must have been a very strong event that took place there."
Radar helps aircraft avoid rough air currents. But an internal wave is a much smoother disturbance that can't be seen or detected in a cloudless sky, he said.
"These radar systems can detect the highly intense activity of turbulent air, but a nice smooth disturbance consistent with an internal wave cannot be picked up. But that disturbance has the dramatic effect that if a plane encounters it, it is swept up or swept downwards.
"You want to have your seatbelt on when that happens."
The Canadian Transportation Safety Board declined comment other than to say that a draft report into what happened to Flight AC-190 is being circulated to Air Canada and other organizations. The board's final report is expected to be released by March.
Air Canada officials also declined comment. The Air Canada Pilots Association did not respond to interview requests.
Sutherland said specific internal waves are difficult to predict without launching many weather balloons within an area, so the most effective way to deal with them is to ensure that flight crews are trained to respond quickly.
If a plane suddenly lifts without warning in areas prone to such internal waves, pilots may have only seconds or perhaps a minute or two to prepare for the plunge down the other side of the wave, he said.
"Even if they couldn't detect it in advance, they would see the signal of it when they hit one side of it and they could at least fix the problem before they hit the other side."

STBYRUD
22nd Oct 2009, 14:20
Hmmm... Mountain waves are not really an uncommon phenomenon, try the Alps for example, wind from the wrong directions and there'll be rotors way up there in the normal cruise levels...

YHZChick
22nd Oct 2009, 14:37
Air Canada did a training session with their pilots WRT this incident. According to that session, the incident was attributable to the tendency for wing tip vortices to reconverge.

A Scarebus-flying friend who read that article felt that it was a bit far fetched. I was interested in hearing from others their thoughts.

FullWings
22nd Oct 2009, 15:16
It's interesting but not really news. In almost every flight I do in both powered and unpowered aircraft, I experience some sort of atmospheric wave activity. much of the time in the lower atmosphere (when away from mountains, etc.) it can only be detected by glider-style instruments that can sense air motions down to three metres per minute. Up in the mid- to high-levels of the troposphere and the edge of the stratosphere it's not unusual to see vertical components in excess of a hundred times that. After 25 years flying, I've come to think that oscillatory motion is the natural state of the atmosphere and flat calm air is the rarity!

In my experience, some of the most rapid and noticeable up/down currents occur when there is a marked reduction in wind velocity (shear) going up through a layer where wave motion exists. This has the effect of moving the streamlines closer to the vertical and enhancing that component. In the extreme, this can lead to the entire flow becoming vertical and even going backwards at some point - this usually breaks down into chaotic air motion and a guaranteed rough ride! You can get this effect anywhere from ground level up to jet cruising altitude and above - some of it is Kelvin–Helmholtz Instability. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin-Helmholtz_instability) There are all sorts of other phenomena such as the Morning Glory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning_Glory_cloud) that hint at what goes on all the time in the atmosphere that we don't observe directly. It's a fascinating subject and one I feel we are only scratching the surface of at the moment...

YHZChick
22nd Oct 2009, 16:07
But to roll 46 degrees to one side and 30 degrees to the other side while losing altitude at 35,000 ft?

I'm really interested in reading the official report of the incident.

Opsbeatch
22nd Oct 2009, 17:20
You'd be amazed what mountain wave can do...!

FullWings
23rd Oct 2009, 10:19
You'd be amazed what mountain wave can do...!
...Larry Edgar found out what rotor can do. On April 25, 1955, his glider quickly disintegrated around him at 17,000 feet as he tried to avoid a swelling roll cloud. Then things became quiet. All he heard was wind noise, and he felt as if he were suspended in space, but he couldn't see because of the G forces, he wrote in Soaring magazine shortly after the experience. He pulled the ripcord and started to worry about being pulled back up. He had lost his helmet, boots, gloves, and oxygen mask, and the hose was broken off of his bailout oxygen bottle. As his vision slowly came back in one eye, he saw pieces of fabric and plywood from the Pratt-Read being carried up past him, disappearing in the roll cloud.

Miraculously, he survived the parachute landing without breaking any bones and fully recovered. As Whelan pointed out in his book, doctors determined that Edgar experienced a force of 20 negative Gs for 0.4 seconds in order to induce the damage to his eyes. While this event punctuated the power of rotor and raised awareness, it also gave scientists data to further explain the way waves function. They later determined that Edgar had experienced a rare kind of rotor where the wave dissipates all of its energy in one horrific oscillation.
Although that result was pretty extreme, those kind of conditions are not that uncommon: we've learned to avoid them!

Cloud Bunny
23rd Oct 2009, 10:51
How? Excuse the potentially stupid question but how have we learnt to avoid them? They are undetectable, other than possible cloud formations that form and studying the wind charts over mountainous areas to see the potential for wave formation, and sigmets, you can't avoid them.
What do you know?!!!! :confused:

FullWings
23rd Oct 2009, 16:52
How? Excuse the potentially stupid question but how have we learnt to avoid them?
I didn't mean all wave, more the sort of violent rotor activity you can get in close proximity to mountains. You can guess from the shape of the slopes and wind profile roughly where they might be, even if there is no cloud and avoid those areas.

They are undetectable, other than possible cloud formations that form and studying the wind charts over mountainous areas to see the potential for wave formation, and sigmets, you can't avoid them.
Well, that's a nice list for starters - you could add pilot reports and if approaching an orographic wave generator from downwind, the possibility of slowly increasing disturbances. OAT fluctuations are also a good clue that something's brewing.

I agree that cruising level phenomena are difficult to avoid in toto but some sort of advance warning can help to mitigate many of the adverse effects. Flying at an appropriate speed, securing the cabin, descending to improve manoeuvre margins, being aware how auto systems respond (not always how you'd want them to)... All these can turn a distressing/injurious encounter into something more benign.

muduckace
23rd Oct 2009, 21:54
Did not need a scientist to solve this one... Just a glider pilot.