PDA

View Full Version : Continental O-200 oil burn?


Merritt
3rd Jul 2009, 11:09
Does anyone know whether Continental specify a 'maximum' allowable oil consumption on the O-200 engines? If so, please can you point me in the direction of the paperwork (I can't find anything useful on their web site)

Our continental O-200 is using around 1L/ph of oil in moderate cruise, which concerns me. The oil pressure is also very low (just in the green).

Any advice appreciated,

Thanks

Steve

Engineer_aus
3rd Jul 2009, 11:31
Perhaps you need to take it to your engineer and have it looked at. 1L per hour I think off memory is still in limits, but its getting up there. I have known 200's to be using 2L per hour. Sounds like one of your bearings is gone.

helifixer
3rd Jul 2009, 12:20
Holy crap brother! How can you afford internet whilst working on piston engine ****e.:confused:

Merritt
3rd Jul 2009, 12:57
Thanks Engineer Aus,

The A/C is group owned (and im not the owner). I have reported it & the owner is looking for a replacement engine but he tells me it has been checked & is safe. Me being the paranoid type (and an Engineer albeit of the semiconductor electronics variety!) thought I'd do some research of my own.

If anyone comes across a halflife or replacement O-200 in the UK on their travels, please let me know!

Cheers

Steve

Yoth
3rd Jul 2009, 14:40
I'd be tempted to giveit a good ground run and pull the oil filter. Split the filter and give it a thorough inspection for metal.
As a previous post says, sounds like a bearing has gone, or on it's way out.

EchoMike
3rd Jul 2009, 17:27
I'd look at some other things before blaming "a bearing".

First - "normal" oil consumption on an O-200 is about a liter every 15 hours or so, some a bit more, some a bit less.

Second - if you fill it to six quarts, "full" on the dipstick, the first hour or so will see half a quart (half a liter) go out the breather tube. You aren't burning it, it is now on the belly of the airplane. Generally, don't fill the oil tank on an O-200 to much past five quarts unless you are going for a six hour ride or more. Try setting the oil level to five quarts on the dipstick and recheck your hourly oil consumption then.

Third - O-200s leak oil, sometimes quite a bit. Check the valve covers (the edges will look like potato chips), check the oil sump gasket (there are two), check the front crank seal (oil appears on the back of the prop) AND check that the vacuum pump isn't bad - gaskets good and the correct gasket (vac pump replaced recently??), no leaks at the case-to-pump junction either. You'll very likely wind up straightening the edges of the valve covers, don't get Continental's valve cover gaskest, get a set of R.E.A.L. (trade name) silicone gaskets instead - about $20.

Oil pressure is OK if it is "in the green" - anywhere between 10 and 50 psi if the engine is above idle. On higher time engines, you may drop below the green at idle. I don't like seeing this, but it's there.

How many hours since MAJOR and how many hours since top overhaul? The bottom end is ready for an overhaul about every two tops - 3,500 hours and it is time for a bottom end overhaul ($$$$$$$$).

O-200s usually eat the center main bearing. You can buy +.010 bearings easily, you can get +.020 bearings under an STC but this gets expensive. Crank life is about 4,000 hours and then it is usually too worn to be reground.

Do you have oil on any/all of the spark plugs? If not, you aren't burning oil, it is leaking. If you have oil on ONE plug or both plugs in ONE jug, look there for your problem - cracked piston or broken rings, bad valve guide.

If a rod bearing is "going" it will sling oil on the cylinder bore and the oil ring won't be able to cope with it. You can change the con-rod bearings on an O-200 without splitting the case, and that's an easy palliative (not cure) for low oil presure.

If this is in an older Cessna 150, be aware that if the later spinner is fitted (the smaller, correct one is NLA), it partially covers the two oval air intakes in the bottom cowl - these guide air to the oil tank. If the motor mounts are also a little saggy (and they usually are) the two air intakes may be completely blocked, and the engine will run progressively hotter and hotter. This problem usually shows up in the summer time (like now) because the high ambient air temps plus the blocked air intakes are just too much. You don't hear too many complaints like this in the winter.

The cure is either no spinner or the beanie cap spinner and replace the eight rubber pucks which are the motor mounts (about $150).

You can check for a bad bearing by removing the cowl and using a long screwdriver as a stethoscope - be careful of the propeller!!! - listen around the center of the crankcase - a clunk-clunk-clunk sound at idle means it is overhaul time.

Do the cheap, easy stuff first before you go looking for another engine.

PM me if you want more info ;-)

Best Regards,

Echo Mike

SNS3Guppy
3rd Jul 2009, 17:37
First of all, internal problems involving bearings and other metal surfaces will be found in an oil spectrometric analysis. Second, a spun bearing won't cause an oil increase in oil consumption. Third, nothing was said by the original poster to suggest a spun bearing. Fourth, not enough information is given. Fifth, we don't know the oil level the original poster is attempting to maintain when he keeps adding a liter. Sixth...oil pressure can easily be adjusted up.

Find the problem first, start small and simple, and work up from there. If you have doubts about the airplane, obviously don't fly it.

Von Klinkerhoffen
3rd Jul 2009, 20:43
Seventh....when was the aircraft oil pressure gauge last check calibrated , it may be telling you porky's !! Eighth......what oil are you running , is it too thin for summer use ?

VK

SNS3Guppy
4th Jul 2009, 04:25
Good point(s)!

NutLoose
4th Jul 2009, 16:14
Agreed, first thing to check is the oil very dirty or black?

Have you had a compression check done of late?, it could be something really simple like glazed barrels or pushing it past the rings if they have lined up......

This might help for the above.



http://www.tcmlink.com/pdf2/SB03-3.pdf

SNS3Guppy
4th Jul 2009, 22:41
Oil color won't tell you anything about engine condition. Continental does say a rapid change within the first 10 hours of operation, but the truth is that oil may instantly discolor, and this means nothing. Without performing spectrometric oil analysis for a baseline, then making a trend comparison, smelling oil, looking at the oil, and feeling the oil won't really tell you anything.

The notion of piston ring gaps lining up to drop compression or increase oil consumption is an old one, but has no basis in fact.

NutLoose
5th Jul 2009, 00:02
Oil colour will tell you if its blowing past the rings or the barrels are glazed and rings lining up do cause a drop in pressure

SNS3Guppy
5th Jul 2009, 02:11
No, oil color really won't. The color of the oil may be due to a number of factors, but one can't tell the condition of the engine by the color of the oil.

This is one myth that most mechanics understand, but it's tough sometimes to convince the lay person. Engine oil color means nothing. If anything, it indicates that the oil is properly suspending material (ashless dispersant)...but even that's far too simplistic. If you want to know about the oil, looking at the color won't tell you anything useful. A spectrometric oil analysis done on a regular basis and compared against a baseline for trend analysis, will.

Quaker State Home (http://www.quakerstate.com/#/car-care/myth-vs-fact/)

Motor Oil Myths and Facts (http://www.nordicgroup.us/oil.htm#The%20Dark%20Oil%20Myth)

Oil Color Lubrication Ability and Contamination Level (http://www.lube4u.com/oilcolor.htm)

Color of Engine Oil (http://www.oilsandlube.com/oil-color.htm)

Oil Myths and Facts (http://www.texlube.com/oilmyths.htm)

Whitfield Oil Company: Motor Oil Myths & Facts (http://www.whitfieldoil.com/www/docs/156.631/)

The notion of staggering piston ring gaps has never had any substantiation, and most understand it to be an old wives tale. Never the less, the myth lives on. There is no difference in a compression test if the ring gaps are aligned, or staggered. Think about it.

When a leakage occurs in a cylinder, it doesn't happen necessarily around an "aligned" portion of the engine. It's a gas...it doesn't need to leak in a straight line, or because of alignment. There's nothing about lining up the gaps in piston rings that will make leakage occur at any greater rate than if they're staggered. Further, leakage around ring end gap is a non-issue, and is irrelevant to the performance of compression tests.

http://www.triplesdownunder.com/Interesting_Stuff/piston%20ring%20gaps.doc

Cessna Pilot
21st Oct 2009, 07:28
Super Guppy - it appears as though your links relate to automotive engines and oils, as opposed to piston aircraft engines. Aircraft engines are a little bit different from a car or truck. The color of engine oil is certainly an indicator of engine condition - if it turns black very soon after oil change blowby is likely very high. I'd be somewhat concerned about this engine - I had an engine with almost identical symptoms cause me to make a forced landing immediately after takeoff last year - thankfully no damage. Ironically, we had completed the annual inspection about 30 hours prior, and compressions were all better than 65/80. Oil pressure was low - it would get up to the bottom of the green when cold, but would hover around redline at idle. Technically it met the Type Certificate Data Sheet but barely (by the way, max oil consumption can be found in this document, available free at FAA: Home (http://www.faa.gov)) Turns out our failure was from broken rings in one cylinder, and a bearing was starting to spin in the case! I suspect it is likely a valve was starting to stick as well, but we weren't able to confirm it for sure. Fortunately in my case, we were able to tear down the engine before we permanently damaged the crankcase and crankshaft. Was it expensive for the owner - oh yes!, but cheaper than trashing the whole engine. Disclaimer - my advice is worth what you paid for it - get a good mechanic and do a thorough checkup on this engine! Good luck and happy flying! CFI, A&P, and other alphabet soup :ok:

NutLoose
21st Oct 2009, 19:53
Totally agree with you Cessna Pilot, but after 35 years in the business, I just don't bite these days, when peeps try to tell me otherwise :)

Malcom
22nd Oct 2009, 12:23
Oil colour will tell you if its blowing past the rings or the barrels are glazed and rings lining up do cause a drop in pressure

and if the valve guides are worn too.

and if the oil has been changed recently.

and if the engines done more hours than alleged in between changes.

Big Pistons Forever
28th Oct 2009, 02:44
Merrit

I have a copy of the Continental Motors A&C series & O200 Operators Manual (Form X30012) It states that the quote approx maximum desirable Oil Consumption : 0.6 Quarts per hour unquote(chart on page 4). Based on that it would appear that at 1Lt per hour your engine is exceeding the maximum consumption Continental specifies in their official document. I highly recommend your group acquire this publicatio as it has complete power curves and much more engine information than the Cessna POH

My experience has been that any of your typical small 4/6cylinder engines that used more than about a litre per 3 hours has had major problems. There is no way I would personally fly an airplane where the engine used this much oil.

A and C
28th Oct 2009, 11:57
Would the oil be leaking so much that the owner puts the nose leg in a tray to keep the oil off the hangar floor?

If so I would suspect crankcase fretting.

NutLoose
28th Oct 2009, 12:30
I went to a Shell / Lycoming seminar and was told the way they determine the oil capacity of the sump is to work out the worst possible oil burn for the aircraft endurance then bung a couple more quarts in on top of that, that determines the size of the sump.

SNS3Guppy
28th Oct 2009, 12:50
- it appears as though your links relate to automotive engines and oils, as opposed to piston aircraft engines.


No, they really don't. They refer to statements made by the oil producers, among others, regarding oil color and analysis based on color...and it's equally applicable to aircraft or automotive applciations. I'm referring to air cooled reciprocating aircraft engines using formulated aircraft engine oils. The color of engine oil, however, is not a reliable indication in either recip aircraft engines, or automotive engines.

The color of engine oil is certainly an indicator of engine condition -


No, it really isn't. This is a myth. Every oil manufacturer specifically states as much as do each of the engine manufacturers. After more than a few years working on aircraft, I agree. If you want to know what's in that oil, a spectrometric oil analysis is the only way to go. Color tells you nothing. I've seen oil turn black right off the bat, and I've seen oil that scarcely changes color until the next oil change; color means nothing.

Don't take my word for it, though...

The Answer Book - Shell Aviation (http://www.shell.com/home/content/aviation/news_and_library/publications/answer_book/)

Why does oil turn black between oil changes, and why does the time it takes to change colour vary?

When a straight mineral oil turns dark or black, it usually means that the oil is starting to oxidize and needs to be changed. Because mineral oil doesn’t absorb much of the dirt and sludge in your engine, the oil stays clean and the inside of your engine gets dirty. Ashless dispersant oils, on the other hand, are designed to get dirty so that the engine will stay clean. Just how quickly the oil turns black depends on a number of factors, including the condition of the engine, the dirt load, the oil temperature, the normal air/fuel mixture, the type of fuel, the time since the last service, and the frequency and duration of your flights. Basically, the important thing to remember is to change your ashless dispersant oil on calendar and engine time, not according to its color. Also, oil analysis can help ensure that the oil is still in good condition even though it may have turned black.


http://www.exxonmobil.com/lubes/exxonmobil/emal/files/TTopic1_OilColor.pdf

The color of the oil will change during normal engine operation when additives do their job of protecting the base stock. Such changes do not affect the performance of the oil and do not indicate contamination or other malfunction.

The phenomenon referred to as “Black Oil” is not due to oil discoloration but to the suspension of very small amorphous particles in the oil. When the particles are filtered from the oil,the color reverts to normal. Black oil arises in certain engines due to an artifact of the engine design. It cannot be eliminated by oil development or reformation.

Motor Oil Myths and Facts (http://www.nordicgroup.us/oil.htm#The%20Dark%20Oil%20Myth)

[QUOTE]The Dark Oil Myth
Dark oil does not indicate the need for an oil change. The way modern detergent motor oil works is that minute particles of soot are suspended in the oil. These minute particles pose no danger to your engine, but they cause the oil to darken. A non-detergent oil would stay clearer than a detergent oil because all the soot would be left on the internal engine parts and would create sludge. If you never changed your oil, eventually the oil would no longer be able to suspend any more particles in the oil and sludge would form. Fortunately, by following the manufacturer's recommended oil change interval, you are changing your oil long before the oil has become saturated. Remember, a good oil should get dirty as it does it's work cleaning out the engine. The dispersant should stop all the gunk from depositing in the oil pan.

The only real way to determine whether oil is truly in need of changing is to have an oil analysis performed. Since most people don't want to bother with this, it's acceptable to err heavily on the safe side and simply follow the manufacturer's recommended change interval for severe service. There are still a few cars that specify 3K intervals for severe service, but not many. If you look at countries other than the U.S., the oil recommended change interval is much higher than even the normal interval specified by vehicle manufacturers in the U.S.



Color of oil isn't a reliable method of determining engine health in automotive or aircraft engines. If anything should be noted with respect to color, it's not the actual color one sees, but two independent factors worth noting in some cases (but not all): rate of color change, and transparency of an oil sample film. It's not uncommon for a rapid change of oil color to occur, and this is not a reliable indication of engine health, but may be a clue to do further investigating...especially if historically this has not occurred with this particular engine. So far as light and oil color of a film sample, this is still subjective and requires spectrometric analysis for any meaningful insight.

This thread primarily concerns oil consumption, not color. Oil consumption is a product of many factors, but the actual rate of consumption is a trifle compared to changes in the rate of consumption. Whether the engine is burning a liter an hour or two or none, it's much more important to look at the history of the engine and note changes.

Is the original poster filling the engine to capacity every time...and subsequently seeing a liter or two blown out the breather? Most piston engines prefer to run a quart or two low, and any extra will quickly be blown overboard. This doesn't indicate an engine health issue, but an operator error issue.

I went to a Shell / Lycoming seminar and was told the way they determine the oil capacity of the sump is to work out the worst possible oil burn for the aircraft endurance then bung a couple more quarts in on top of that, that determines the size of the sump.


That's the method? See how much it needs and "bung a couple more quarts in on top?" It's a little more exacting than that. The certification standards for recip piston engines, to include engines such as the 0-200, are that the sump holds double what the engine actually requires. It's found in the certification regulation 14 CFR 33.39 (Airworthiness Standards, Aircraft Engines), and reads:

§ 33.39 Lubrication system.

(a) The lubrication system of the engine must be designed and constructed so that it will function properly in all flight attitudes and atmospheric conditions in which the airplane is expected to operate. In wet sump engines, this requirement must be met when only one-half of the maximum lubricant supply is in the engine.


Typical maximum oil consumption for a small piston engine is about a quart an hour...which equates to just over a liter. This isn't necessarily a bad thing. If there are concerns, one should be performing inspections and maintenance to determine if further investigation or work is warranted.

Oil consumption increases as oil degrades. Longer times between oil change intervals may see an increase in consumption in some engines.

Teledyne Continental makes the following statement about oil consumption:

Teledyne Continental Motors ||Visitor Services|| (http://www.tcmlink.com/visitors/carenfeed/englubhdr.cfm)

Evaluate the overall oil consumption with respect to the engine installation. In general, look for stability of oil consumption rather than level as a health indicator. If you have a highly loaded installation or turbocharged engine, you may want to evaluate and reflect on the oil consumption rate between a multi-viscosity oil and a straight-weight oil. Generally the use of multi viscosity oil will result in a lower oil consumption level. It is not harmful to change the basic type of oil used in the engine and to evaluate the result.


And, of course...

To guide the long-term oil selection and engine monitoring process, I would begin a disciplined oil analysis program. Again, our TCMLINK Aviator Services program provides a convenient and cost effective method for the owner/operator to track his oil analysis results. Followed with discipline, oil analysis can help you monitor engine wear trends somewhat more scientifically as compared to reliance on "hangar talk".


So far as "hangar talk," what you won't find from Shell or Mobil, or Continental or Lycoming...is a reference suggesting you should determine your engine's health using oil color. You'll find a number of references to spectrometric oil analysis, however...which is a little more scientific and accurate than guessing about the engine because you think you know something about the color.

You'll also find that the emphasis isn't on the amount of oil the engine is burning or passing, but on the stability of that rate of consumption. If you're one liter an hour now but it changes to two on the next flight, you may have a problem. Likewise, if it suddenly drops, you may have a problem, such as an occluded breather with an impending shaft seal failure...something along those lines. Change in the rate of consumption is much more important than how much is actually being consumed or lost.

Continental provides the maximum consumption number based on the percentage of power at which the engine has been operating, as .006 X %power, divided by 100. The result is the lbs per brake horsepower per hour, max. You can view the document at: http://www.tcmlink.com/EngSpecSheetDocs/O200A.doc

Technically it met the Type Certificate Data Sheet but barely (by the way, max oil consumption can be found in this document, available free at FAA: Home)

As far as the TCDS and legal official max oil consumption, re: the TCDS...do you happen to see it there?

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/8f38ff75fb7ad83d8625763500632b82/$FILE/E-252.pdf

No?

...and rings lining up do cause a drop in pressure


A ridiculously outdated myth that wasn't true when people still believed it. It wasn't true long ago, and is not true now, despite the fact that some still cling to this false notion.

Big Pistons Forever
28th Oct 2009, 16:36
The point raised earlier about stable oil consumption is a very important one.
I made the assumption that the oil consumption in the O 200 engine mentioned in the original post, was steady at the 1lt/hr. If it is a sudden new development than I would say you almost certainly have a sick engine. I had an engine failure in a fully loaded PA31 shortly after takeoff. I was faced with the choice of flying single engine, 100 nm over high mountains, or return to my departure airport which would require a NDB approach to minimums with a circle to land:uhoh:. This was obviously not a great day for me. The moral of the story was the previous pilot suddenly had to put a total of 6 litres of oil into the engine in the last 4 hrs.:suspect: He did not think this developement was worth reporting to maintainance :ugh:

Nevertheless I still think this level of oil consumption for such a small engine is not acceptable. If it is leaking this amount of oil than the belly is going to be literally dripping with oil/and or there will be 3 foot wide puddle under the nose. If it is burning the oil than it is either;

1) totally worn out: this is likely if it has a high time since overall and the low oil pressure is an indications that the bearing s are so worn that the clearances have increased to the point where the oil pump can not pump hard enough to maintain pressure. Heavily oil fouled spark plugs will also frequently indicate heavily worn/corroded cylinders

2) has a faling major internal engine component: symptons here are often a sudden dramatic rise in oil consumption, sudden increase in oil temp, new and unusual vibrations, and/or failure to make full static RPM at the beginning of the takeoff run.

SNS3Guppy
28th Oct 2009, 22:08
I'm often surprised by the number of operators who don't track oil consumption. For most, it's a given on a turbine engine, but many don't think twice about it when putting oil in a piston airplane.

I recently suggested it to a piston operator and he looked at me as though I was out of my mind. Why would he care about that, he said. Why, indeed.

Cessna Pilot
29th Oct 2009, 00:41
My bad, the max oil consumption is in the Overhaul manual - but 1.05 qt (1 litre) an hour is out of spec - no brainer, the engine needs repaired.
SuperGuppy does raise a point, it is essential to track the oil used by the engine - any radical change in oil consumption indicates a problem. He is incorrect about the color of the oil - oil that quickly changes color after a change can indicate excessive blowby. Note that this is not an exclusive indicator of engine condition, but a factor to consider. Further, oil loss out of the breather is a great indicator of excess blowby and should be investigated.
If you really must fly this airplane, get a qualified mechanic to look over the engine (at your own cost if necessary) Get a second opinion if necessary. It's cheaper than a trip to the emergency room!

blackhand
29th Oct 2009, 04:04
SNS3GUPPY
[QUOTE]I recently suggested it to a piston operator and he looked at me as though I was out of my mind.[/QUOTE

Could be your anual retentive attitude:E

SNS3Guppy
29th Oct 2009, 16:35
Further, oil loss out of the breather is a great indicator of excess blowby and should be investigated.


Possibly.

Oil loss out the breather is also very possible with a normally running engine when the engine is overfilled. One can be within the rated and posted capacity for the engine, and still overfill it . There are no shortage of engine out there that tend to run two quarts below their sump capacity, and will blow the extra out quickly. Thus it's possible to keep losing a quart an hour and have an engine that's not consuming oil and has no blow-by problem. If oil is being added above the normal running level for that particular engine, then one should expect to keep seeing it blown out. This is why I stated in my original post that not enough information is provided. We may be hearing about a perfectly normal engine; oil consumption alone is an inadequate indicator of engine health, without more information...as is oil color.

Our continental O-200 is using around 1L/ph of oil in moderate cruise, which concerns me. The oil pressure is also very low (just in the green).


The original poster didn't indicate the starting oil level. If it's a six quart sump and six are being put in...one might expect a quart or even two to be lost over the course of a flight. If one continues to operate the airplane and sees no further decrease in the rate of oil "use," then all that has happened is the engine has sought it's natural operating level. This post, providing very little information, does nothing to suggest that the engine is beyond it's overhaul limits, or that it's no longer airworthy.

The inclusion of a statement in the same sentence stipulating low oil pressure makes the condition sound as if the two are tied together,when indeed this may or may not be the case. Tweaking up the oil pressure and determining whether the engine is consuming oil or simply blowing out extra is important before passing judgement suggesting overhaul or maintenance. The engine may be perfectly fine. In absence of any further useful information from the original poster, we are left without anywhere to go.

Could be your anual retentive attitude


No. I don't have an anal retentive attitude.

The owner was too stupid to bother tracking oil consumption...like many operators out there. Ignorance is bliss, until it bites you in the ass.

pulse1
29th Oct 2009, 16:40
There is a breather mod for the 0-200 which lengthens the pipe by extending a horizontal section across the top of the engine. It has worked well on our machine and we do not see any oil drips from the beather since we did it.

blackhand
29th Oct 2009, 20:05
Piston rings do rotate around the ring groove during operation.
There are various reasons for this, or rather theories on why this happens.
In two stroke engines the rings are located by a pin to prevent the rotation.

It is generally accepted that the ring gaps do line up from time to time but have marginal affect on compression leakdown.
Once the rings are bedded in during the initial run in, the position of each ring gap doesn't affect oil control.

Cheers
Blackhand

SNS3Guppy
29th Oct 2009, 22:35
Ring position was once thought to cause compression loss or blow-by, until it finally dawned on the thinking populace that gasses don't need to move in a straight line...and therefore the position of the ring gaps with respect to one another is irrelevant.

Sandy Hutton
31st Oct 2009, 15:59
"The notion of piston ring gaps lining up to drop compression or increase oil consumption is an old one, but has no basis in fact."


I disagree with this one. Worn or aligned rings will give an increase in crankcase pressure and this can shove oil out the breather and down the inlet valve guides if they are worn too.:=

blackhand
1st Nov 2009, 09:04
Sandy Hutton

Worn or aligned rings will give an increase in crankcase pressure and this can shove oil out the breather and down the inlet valve guides if they are worn too.

Evidence for this?

Sandy Hutton
1st Nov 2009, 12:37
Experience old boy. Continental say the max allowable crankcase pressure for the O-200 should be no more than 1" H2o.

:hmm:


And your previous comments about two stroke rings being pinned. That's so that the rings don't rotate and get caught up in the ports. You didn't explain that very well. :=

blackhand
1st Nov 2009, 20:25
Sandy Hutton

One couldn't dispute that crank case pressure increases with gas blow by.

Is this evidence of increased blow by when compression ring gaps line up?

Good point about two stroke engines, can be also found on two stroke diesel engines with normal valve train.

You may find that oil consumption through the valve guides is a consequence of worn valve guides without the need for increased crank case pressure.

That is interesting about the manometer pressure for the crank case, have you ever checked your engines? I can't recall seeing it done. Where do you connect the tube to? Crank case breather?

Blackhand

SNS3Guppy
1st Nov 2009, 21:13
Worn or aligned rings will give an increase in crankcase pressure and this can shove oil out the breather and down the inlet valve guides if they are worn too.


A wives tale still believed by some, but proven by none...and which melts in the face of common sense. Most certainly a crankcase can be pressurized by blowby, but not by gap alignment in the rings. Staggering the ring gaps is superstition.

Gas is fluid, and does not need gaps in a straight line to pressurize the case. There is no increase in case pressure to be found by aligning the gaps in a ring than staggering them. The gas need not travel in a straight line, and gap alignment makes zero difference in the pressure which may leak past the rings. None.

Sandy Hutton
1st Nov 2009, 21:17
There's plenty of evidence of increased case pressure where the rings have aligned if you care to perform a Differential Pressure Test. Have a listen to the breather outlet and watch the sludge and moisture coming out. Granted I have only ever plumbed in a Manometer while testing engines after overhaul but there's nothing to stop you having a go anytime, even if that's not in the books for normal maintenance.:ugh:

Now, will you agree that an increase in case pressure will have an effect on the amount of oil that goes down the Inlet Valve guides, particularly if they are worn? (Continentals don't have the luxury of having Valve stem seals as they do in automotive applications):ok:


Guppy:-
"A wives tale still believed by some, but proven by none...and which melts in the face of common sense. Most certainly a crankcase can be pressurized by blowby, but not by gap alignment in the rings. Staggering the ring gaps is superstition."

Superstition or old wives tale, the Manual says the Rings should be staggered 90deg apart and that's the Spec I shall abide by. :ok:

blackhand
2nd Nov 2009, 06:53
Sandy Hutton

Had a bit of free time, all helicopters flying, so went on an internet search to find the definitive answer to this vexing question.

And this is what I found
Teledine Continental Engine Service Bulletin M84-15
SUPERSEDES M76-18 Rev.1
Dynamic Seal Check
(k) To check the dynamic seal of a cylinder, proceed with the leakage test and observe the pressure indication of the cylinder pressure gage. The difference between this pressure and the pressure shown by the regulator gage is the amount of leakage at the dynamic seal.
(l) If the leakage is below the previously determined low cylinder gage reading, loss past the dynamic seal may be due to piston ring end gap alignment or by the piston and piston rings angular direction in the cylinder bore see
So Mr Continental agrees with you.

Cheers
Blackhand

Malcom
2nd Nov 2009, 09:21
RR O-200 only has a 5QT sump. Don't have one of them-do you?


Another thought is aeros/unusual attitudes. Are you sure these can be discounted? These can chuck a lot of oil out the breather.

Chinesespaceman
8th Aug 2010, 08:13
Hi Guppy,

How can the oil pressure be adjusted up?
I am having pressure problems oin an O-200 that has 80 hrs SMOH. Have just changed to Aero80 oil and suspect too thin for summer use, 22degC ambient here. Temp rising to 100degC. As temp rises pressure drops, about 20PSI in the climb and can drop as low as 10PSI in the cruise.....

Firstly am going to change to 100 oil and then think check oil pressure relief valve.

Any thoughts?

Gavin

stevef
8th Aug 2010, 09:10
You say Aero 80 oil. To drift slightly, Straight 80 (or whatever viscosity grade recommended) is usually used for breaking in new engines and ashless dispersant (W prefix) thereafter, depending on the engine manufacturer. This could be after 25, 50 or 100 hours of operation.
If you've got oil pressure problems this soon after overhaul, you should be raising the issue with your maintenance organisation or the overhaul facility as the engine will be under warranty.
I wouldn't be flying it with those indications.
What aircraft is it btw?

NutLoose
8th Aug 2010, 11:07
Agreed with everything said, get your maintainance people involved and avoid flying it or running it until then......

as for oil pressure

Low oil pressure in Lycoming or Continental aircraft engine (http://www.sacskyranch.com/eng26.htm)

Inability to adjust oil pressure in Lycoming or Continental aircraft engine (http://www.sacskyranch.com/eng167.htm)

some of them have a spring with washers behind it to increase the pressure. but as said

the cause may be indicitive of other problems so get your engineers to look at it or the overhaul company before it gets the wrong side of expensive.

blackhand
8th Aug 2010, 22:43
How can the oil pressure be adjusted up?Hi Chinesespaceman
When you set your pressure relief valve to a nominal pressure, say 40psi, that is the pressure that it will open at to maintain the 40 psi.

If your engine once warmed up drops to 20 psi, the oil pressure is not reaching the cracking pressure so adjusting the pressure relief valve will have no affect.

Some options, the px valve is leaking, the oil cooler vernatherm valve is jammed, oil pump is worn.
Crankshaft bearing clearances are too large.

When the engine was overhauled, was the oil cooler and vernatherm valve serviced?

Cheers
BH

Big Pistons Forever
9th Aug 2010, 00:37
The 0200 does not have an oilcooler or vernatherm

blackhand
9th Aug 2010, 01:41
The 0200 does not have an oilcooler or vernatherm :confused:

So what keeps the oil at operating temperature?

Cheers
BH

Big Pistons Forever
9th Aug 2010, 02:10
Airflow around the external kidney shaped oil tank. But as there is no oil cooler which oil can be diverted towards or away from as required to regulate oil temperature (the function of the veratherm) the pilot may have to increase airflow by increasing the airspeed if the oil temperatures becomes too hot.

blackhand
9th Aug 2010, 02:36
Yo Big Pistons
Thanks for the explanation.
Just had a look at the TDS for these engines.
Looks like the oil inlet temp is quite high, around 215 deg F.
With equal low oil pressure.

Maybe Chinesespace person doesn't have a problem at all.

Always learning!!

Cheers
BH

Chinesespaceman
10th Aug 2010, 20:02
Hi Guys,

I checked the pressure relief valve for correct seating using engineers blue on the plunger and found not to be seating properly. Gave the seat a tweak with the "special tool" and checked again, getting a good wide seat. Replaced the spring (the old one was ok, but changed anyway) and added 2 washers behind the spring. Hey presto, 20PSI at Idle and 30PSI anywhere above that. And now the pressure isn't chasing the throttle as it had been.
Will double check the electric pressure gauge against a new hydraulic gauge I bought before flying at the weekend and report the findings.

Have bought 2 x 2" aluminium flanges and flexi pipe to fit some cold air ducts directed onto the sump as there is no air cooling to the bottom of the engine at all, except the hot air coming down from the cylinders.


Cheers

Gavin

NutLoose
10th Aug 2010, 22:27
Out of interest what was the pressure when the engine was overhauled? because if it has dropped, simply upping it may be hiding something.

stevef
10th Aug 2010, 22:28
Good work, China, but be very careful that you don't invalidate your warranty by what might be considered unauthorised adjustments. The repair facility would rightly reject any claim for failure if they found evidence of this.
You surely paid a lot for the overhaul and they have the obligation for rectification within the specified period.

Chinesespaceman
11th Aug 2010, 20:36
Hi Guys, the aircraft is on a Permit ot Fly in the UK and the rebuild was carried out by the previous owner under supervision of his LAA inspector. So, all legal and proper, but no warranty. I have all the receipts and certificates of conformance for all the parts. I have all the phhotos of the work being undertaken and the parts laid out. A quality job. The guy is a very experienced and competent engineer so I'm confident in the work carried out. Whilst I appreciate anyone can make an error, I would be surprised, but am not taking any chances when it'smy bum on the seat.

On very low idle, just before lean cut out, the pressure was indicating as low as 5psi but no warning light. The POH states the warning light comes on at 10PSI. I have ordered a new gauge that plumbs directly into the oil system so I can cross reference the existing electric gauge which is automotive aftermarket.

Will be interesting to see what this actually reads at the weekend.

Cheers

Gavin

N2024
19th May 2012, 21:04
Sorry for the late post, but this info is very usefull for me. I was concerned about 1 litre oil per 40 hours in my O200:hmm:. But sorry, with 1 litre per hour I`ll refuse to fly with this engine anymore. Last week my O200 got a new exhaust btw.

http://www.keukenshowroom.be/images/uitlaat-cessna-150.jpg

heated ice detector
23rd May 2012, 01:48
Hey N2024,
Nice exhaust, how is your r/h carby heat valve bearing, photo makes it look a bit worn

hillberg
23rd May 2012, 02:28
Had an O-200 sucking oil :eek:,The cylinders were not broken in :=,Removed the glazing on the jugs & checked the top end, reassembled and broke it in by the book:ok: & had no oil burn & the temps & power was great.:rolleyes: