PDA

View Full Version : Merged: Qantas Freight Price-Fixing


GalleyHag
4th May 2009, 01:34
From today's SMH

Ex-Qantas freight chief pays heavy price for cartelMay 4, 2009
Bruce McCaffrey's life has been turned upside down, writes Matt O'Sullivan.

QANTAS may have washed its hands of its role in a price-fixing scandal in the US but one of its former senior managers is still paying the price.

Bruce McCaffrey, 65, the former vice-president of freight for the Americas, will soon begin a six-month jail term for his part in a global air freight cartel among more than 30 airlines. He has already paid a $US20,000 fine after pleading guilty to fixing charges last May.

Although the airline has been hurt financially for its part in the racket - footing fines of more than $100 million in the US and Australia - no other Qantas managers have faced personal fines or time behind bars. A plea agreement reached with the US Department of Justice more than a year ago protected all of Qantas's management from prosecution.

McCaffrey's family and friends believe he has become a Qantas scapegoat. The five other freight employees who were excluded from the plea deal have avoided penalties.

The 26-year Qantas veteran was the first airline executive anywhere to agree to serve jail time for his role in the cartel.

The airlines involved in the cartel, which included British Airways and Korean Air, were first prosecuted in the US, triggering almost identical action worldwide. Qantas's admission of its role has meant that the legal pursuit - apart from class actions - has been concluded in Australia and the US, but settlements in Europe and New Zealand are yet to be reached. European authorities are expected to give Qantas a substantial penalty as early next month.

McCaffrey was due to begin his US jail term last month, but his New York lawyer told the Herald a date was still to be finalised.

His jail term had originally been set to begin in September but it was delayed because he needed a kidney transplant. McCaffrey also suffers from the after-effects of stroke, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension and an injured knee and broken hip.

His sister, Karen McCaffrey, wrote in a character reference that his family and friends were "devastated, knowing he was the one taking the brunt of the blame for this crime".

"It seems that Qantas could care less about Bruce; he is no longer an employee, so they pinned him in a corner, and now they are hanging their loyal messenger. They apparently don't care what happens to Bruce, as long as their Australian management are not fined or sentenced."

As a middle manager, four tiers below the chief executive, McCaffrey reported to supervisors in Sydney. But his superiors will not face criminal punishment. They cannot be extradited to the US to face charges because price-fixing conduct is not a criminal offence in Australia.

"Why is it that senior management, the ones making all the decisions, are not forced to face these charges?" Ms McCaffrey said. "They refuse to be extradited back to this country to testify, for they know they are the guilty parties."

His lawyers have argued that the plan to engage in price-fixing came from Sydney hierarchy. "At Qantas, the plan to engage in price-fixing emanated from Sydney, which gave direction to Qantas managers around the world, including Mr McCaffrey, to co-ordinate certain aspects of pricing with their colleagues at other airlines," the lawyers told the judge.

Carl Fiel, a former Qantas executive in the US, also wrote in a reference that he was appalled by "the very unfair treatment" his former workmate received from the airline. Qantas declined to comment on claims that McCaffrey had been a scapegoat.

The executive, based in Los Angeles, was the first individual to co-operate with US investigators and plead guilty. The investigation has resulted in fines for airlines including Qantas, British Airways and Japan Airlines totalling more than $US1 billion. Last week a former freight boss for the Dutch airline Martinair agreed to serve eight months' jail and pay a $US20,000 fine, taking to four the number of executives who have pleaded guilty in the US.

The pursuit of airlines involved in the cartel has led to regulators - especially those in Europe and the US - taking a harder look at arrangements between carriers. Two weeks ago the European Commission began two separate investigations into seven airlines that have co-operated on trans-Atlantic routes. The European authorities are targeting airlines, including BA and American Airlines, which operate under the Oneworld banner for flights between the US and Europe and the Star Alliance.

The commission believes the level of co-operation, such as joint management of schedules, capacity and pricing, is "far more extensive than the general co-operation between these airlines and other airlines which are part of the Star and Oneworld alliances".

The Australian investigation into the cartel is now in its final phase. So far Qantas is the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's biggest scalp in a two-year inquiry that has been the largest and most expensive in its history.

Singapore Airlines is the first carrier to fight the Australian regulator's claims that it broke the law by colluding with rivals to set high freight and security surcharges. The case against the Asian carrier was back in the Federal Court in Sydney last month, and Singapore Airline's lawyers contested the commission's definition of a market. Last Thursday Cathay Pacific also began fighting claims it had colluded with rivals after the Australian regulator began legal action.

Qantas, on the other hand, has largely avoided a public fight. It is banking on its assistance in investigations in Europe and New Zealand leading to lighter penalties. But for McCaffrey the real fight has only just begun.

Lodown
4th May 2009, 04:31
We'll probably never know the full story. QF management may very well have put the pressure on and told the guy to do as they ordered, however, the bottom line is that just about every person in the USA with half a brain knows not to discuss sharing the market and setting prices in collusion with other companies, supposedly running in competition. The penalties are severe. IMO, this is similar to the pilot going below LSALT and blaming the customer for pressuring him to do it.

However, if QF management did order the guy to do it, IMO it is a despicable cop-out not to own up to it. If so, I hope the guy's supervisor has a tough time sleeping at night for the rest of his/her life.

blow.n.gasket
4th May 2009, 11:29
What about the CEO who presided over this whole sorry saga!

walaper
6th May 2009, 09:15
The sad thing about all this is it reinforces to me that one's loyalty should only extend to the the next pay check.:ooh:

lowerlobe
6th May 2009, 09:45
If it has been proven that there was indeed price fixing then who was the beneficiary?

Who would gain the most from higher freight prices?

The answer to that question would then lead to who should be held responsible and therefore accountable....

heads_down
6th May 2009, 11:31
that person just retired with millions and an excellent work record and reference. That's how we do business here.

jungle juice
6th May 2009, 20:57
an excellent work record
How do you define 'Excellent' ?

I think the failed takeover was more indicative of the person than anything else.

heads_down
6th May 2009, 22:47
you'd be surprised, all CEO that did not go to jail will then ask to be consultants for government departments or chairman of some big companies, look at Margaret Jackson and her excellent track record before she became chairman of Qantas. Example Sol Trijello of Telstra will now be heading to America with some chairman position after he single handedly brought Telstra share prices to the bottom of pits.

however the same cannot be said for CEO wannabes like Borgetti. there's nothing for him, just crumbs.

heads_down
6th May 2009, 22:55
How do you define 'Excellent' ?

I think the failed takeover was more indicative of the person than anything else.

if his performance was based on that failed takeover, then one would have thought immediately after the incident, he would have been sacked for incompetence.

But he remained as CEO after that and much to analyst surprised, unquestioned by shareholders and in fact, had the shareholders full support to stay on as CEO until he decides when he wants to go.

Things don't always work the way nature intended it, good girls may go to heaven but bad girls go to London Paris and New York.

But honestly, if you look around you some of the most successful business people are not the most honest.

Honest people just work all their life paying taxes. That's the way it goes. Dishonest and greedy people appear to succeed very quickly and most do not even have to repent for their sins, we already have one example.

jungle juice
6th May 2009, 23:42
heads_down,
I'm not sure whether you are condoning their actions but you cannot surely suggest that the person in question had an excellent record.The failed takeover was a case in point.Now you suggest another with this comment.look at Margaret Jackson and her excellent track record before she became chairman of Qantas
Are you referring to her performance with BHP,PacDunlop and Billabong to mention a few as excellent?
It looks like your definition of excellence is a lot different to mine and others.

heads_down
6th May 2009, 23:45
I was being sarcastic!!!!:eek:

the warehouse of excellence:eek:

LG's service excellence:eek:

the Excellence award:eek:

I tell you what anytime Qantas talks about Excellence, it's really about ****.

TWT
8th Jul 2009, 23:33
Qantas fined $169k in Canada over freight cartel,more fines to come.. We're guilty, again: Qantas (http://business.smh.com.au/business/were-guilty-again-qantas-20090708-ddcd.html)

1746
9th Jul 2009, 11:47
Cartel crims face 10 years jail ACCC
Thursday, July 09, 2009 » 08:54pm

Company executives face up to 10 years in jail if found guilty of serious cartel conduct, the nation's consumer watchdog warned on Thursday.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) boss Graeme Samuel said while cartel activity has been outlawed for more than 30 years, there will be additional sanctions of criminal conviction and jail under new laws from July 24.

'In the case of serious cartel activity, no matter how fat your chequebook, nor to what lengths a corporation will go to defend the position of its executives, there is no amount of money that will remove the risk of you going to jail,' Mr Samuel told a meeting of the American Chamber of Commerce in Sydney.

'A criminal cartel prosecution will not be negotiable - you will not be able to buy your way out of a criminal conviction and jail.'

Mr Samuel said lawyers should not concern themselves with trying to second-guess the line between the possibility of jail term or civil penalty.

'They should simply advise their clients not to participate in any cartel,' he said.

'You do not fix prices, you do not rig bids, you do not allocate customers. This is the kind of conduct which could expose your client to jail.'

He said the ACCC will use the full force of the law to bring offenders to account, either financially or through incarceration.

Aside from a 10-year jail term, offenders potentially face a fine and a ban from being a company director or company manager for life.

Additionally, a business could be subject to fines of up to $10 billion, or three times the criminal gain, or 10 per cent of group turnover, whichever is the highest.

'In terms of penalties for participation in cartels, Australia has been seen as the soft underbelly in international cartel operations,' he said.

'Internationally you face jail for involvement in a cartel. In Australia, you can simply use part of the money you have stolen to pay a fine - and keep the rest.'

Too bad the enforcement date isn't retrospective!!!!!

David Brent
9th Jul 2009, 18:09
Shouldn't the blame rest with the Scrotum?

My dividends are diminishing with every new fine emposed..and the Scrotum and The Fat Lady get to sail off into retirement bliss..

Imagine if Toomey had got the Scrotum's job all those years ago? Would the roles be reversed?

David Brent
9th Jul 2009, 19:28
Shareholder revolt?? The only way shareholder revolt is going to topple someone like the Scrotum is when UBS and the other big brokers and equity holders do something that resembles balls..