PDA

View Full Version : Longest Flight


beachbumflyer
1st Jul 2008, 23:01
Hi guys,
Does anyone know which is the longest schedule pax or cargo flight?
Thanks.

MarkerInbound
1st Jul 2008, 23:46
SQ runs back and forth to Newark, shows the arrival two days later going west.

Fly3
2nd Jul 2008, 02:46
My longest cargo flight was in a B744F LAX-HKG at 14.50. Only carried 20 tonnes of cargo but enjoyed the crew bunks for the one and only time!

crj705
2nd Jul 2008, 03:12
SQ's is the longest followed by TG's JFK-BKK, however that has been discontinued as of a few days ago. I took the Thai flight a few times and it is pretty rough being on an airplane that long. Longest for me was 18 hours due to some delays. However, not having to connect in Europe or Japan made it worth it.

SoundBarrier
2nd Jul 2008, 04:51
Well there are some guys at a local airfield going for this very record doing rather large circuits in a C152! :}

Sorry - I didn't mean to leave Jet Blast - I didn't HONEST! :ok:

ULH Extreme
2nd Jul 2008, 05:07
Normal flt time about 17 to 18hrs, however,have done over 19.30 airborne with holding at EWR. That`s when you need all 4 drivers up the front to get the IQ level above 100. Before you ask, yes we have bedrooms, get 2 rest periods, 1 must be more than 4hrs and are generally as well rested as possible.

212man
2nd Jul 2008, 10:18
I've done the EWR round trip a few times and can vouch that's a lot of movies and champagne! They've just launched the all business class 345 on that route too. Taking off from SIN you feel like you are going to drive there - the acceleration is not great! Losing a day airborne is quite a strange concept.

I did the LAX-SIN route this year and although a bit shorter (about 14 hours) it was equally bizarre spending the whole flight at night and losing a day too. It was particulary depressing to watch us overfly Brunei at 0300 in the morning on the skymap, knowing that I still had 2 hours to SIN, then would have to wait for the 0900 flight back to Brunei.

forget
2nd Jul 2008, 10:53
SQ runs back and forth to Newark, shows the arrival two days later going west. :confused::confused:

How's that work then? If you go the other way do you gain two days.:bored:

To lose two days you'd have to cross the Date Line and be airborne for more than 24 hours. ( I already know I'll regret asking this :) )

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b270/cumpas/NEWARKSIN.jpg

forget
2nd Jul 2008, 12:26
Got it :ugh::ugh:

You fly through midnight, that's one day. You cross the Date Line, that's two days. I think. :hmm:

212man
2nd Jul 2008, 14:42
You chose the wrong route too...

forget
2nd Jul 2008, 14:49
So what is the route? - with diversions

chornedsnorkack
2nd Jul 2008, 15:43
Well there are some guys at a local airfield going for this very record doing rather large circuits in a C152!
Yes, but it is not scheduled - I think.

Some folks flew something like 2 months without landing - back in 1950-s or 1960-s or so, on small GA planes. They refueled in air - by hose from trucks running on road beneath.

However, among the scheduled services the A340-500 jets still do not match the flight times of Constellations back in 1950-s. Europe to western North America, nonstop (and no aerial refueling) for over 22 hours.

And THAT did not match the Catalina services between Perth and Ceylon. Nonstop (again no refueling) for 29 hours.

Brian Abraham
3rd Jul 2008, 01:04
It was particulary depressing to watch us overfly Brunei at 0300 in the morning on the skymap, knowing that I still had 2 hours to SIN, then would have to wait for the 0900 flight back to Brunei.
Take your chute next time and practice the HALO. :E

fireflybob
3rd Jul 2008, 08:58
I asked this before on another thread but when will we see LHR-SYD non stop?

I know QANTAS did this sector empty in 20 hours years ago but will we ever see this as a non stop revenue sector?

dkz
3rd Jul 2008, 11:50
I know the longest "cargo" ... TU-95 (kinda' dangerous goods cargo but it's still a flight).

A few weeks without landing, range 9400 nm but able to refuel in flight.

Oftenfly
3rd Jul 2008, 12:18
Hmm. In that case, some of you might feel that corrections are needed to Wikipedia's article on the subject. Oftenfly


Non-stop flight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonstop_flight#Records)

Fil
4th Jul 2008, 12:49
A few years ago BA did Brussels:Melbourne direct and it was at the time the longest commercial revenue flight, but not scheduled. It was carrying Blair (Uk Prime Minister at the time) and his whole entourage from an EU summit directly to the closing ceremony of the Commonwealth games.

From memory around 150 PAX, total trip time was just under 20 hours using a 777-200ER (297T MTOW) so a 777-200LR (which BA do not have) would go further (around 340/350T MTOW). It was a true revenue flight carrying a decent load for a real reason and not just a record attempt with negligible passengers onboard.

jolly girl
4th Jul 2008, 13:31
"Some folks flew something like 2 months without landing - back in 1950-s or 1960-s or so, on small GA planes. They refueled in air - by hose from trucks running on road beneath."

Here it is...
"Imagine spending over two months in a Cessna 172, flying twenty four hours a day, without even landing for fuel. That's exactly what two pilots did back in 1958 in the California and Nevada desert. Bob Timm and John Cook set a world endurance record, remaining airborne for just under 65 days. It was a publicity flight, sponsored by the Hacienda Hotel in Las Vegas.

A stock Cessna 172 was purchased, then modified for the flight. Although the Continental engine was basically untouched, two oil systems, filters, and a 95 gallon fuel tank were installed. The oil could be changed and the plane refuelled without shutting down the engine. Except for the pilot seat, the interior was gutted, then re-done to include a mattress and a sink. The right side door was collapsible, providing access to the exterior and enabling the co-pilot to operate a winch for bringing supplies aboard from below. Re-fuelling and re-supplying the airplane were the tricky parts. Twice daily, the plane was flown just above a speeding truck from which a hose was hoisted up to pump 95 gallons of avgas into the belly tank. Food, water and other supplies were lifted up from the truck as well."

For more info and photos:
http://www.ocis.net/tvsac/0803news.html

The last time I saw the aircraft, it was hanging in MacCarran airport between the terminal and baggage claim.

forget
5th Jul 2008, 21:36
Orkneys? An actual SQ21, below. :confused:


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b270/cumpas/33.jpg

BAMRA wake up
6th Jul 2008, 09:22
From an earlier thread:

Aircraft Airbus A340-500 (quad-jet) (H/A345/Q (http://flightaware.com/live/aircrafttype/A345))Origin Newark/New York Liberty Int'l (KEWR (http://flightaware.com/live/airport/KEWR))Destination Singapore Changi (WSSS (http://flightaware.com/live/airport/WSSS)) Route MERIT HFD PUT TOPPS N111B DOTTY NATT
ODLUM UN551 NIBOG UN552 MAC UN562 SAB
UL983 MADAD UL983 VES UL975 ELVIX UL621
DIBED UL981 SOBLO B143 KARAT B143 IDLER
UM747 LUSAL UB111 SAGIL UA912 RODAR N644
LEMODDate Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006Duration 16 hours 32 minutes


(...NAT track, southern Scotland, cental Europe...)

http://www.pprune.org/forums/rumours-news/256278-long-haul-what.html