Front Seater
28th Jun 2008, 22:45
Have I had a few ales - yes I have, so please forgive me! :O
And maybe this kind of thread requires a sober head, but it has been playing on my mind for a while.
What is the definitive minimums for competency? I know that there are some international organisations that go 3 months between flying and still remain 'operational', but somewhere I know that there is a NATO STANAG that says 15 hrs a month (or 180 hrs a year) although I cannot find it.
My point is when the hierarchy 'take it on risk' that crews are not getting regular flying training what is the limit to which I say, I am sorry I as the aircraft captain/authorisor am not prepared to carry your risk as in the subsequent BOI you will be no where in sight Sir?
I do not want to be seen as the person that whinges, whines or 'lets go of the rope' but at the same time I do not want to be the person that knowingly is flying pre-deployment training sortie profiles bouncing off currencies (if even that - more like check ride to re-gain currency then crack on with demanding sorties).
My gut feeling is that because our previous high standard of currency/competency cannot be resourced because of where all of the resources are going (i.e. on Ops) then 'the bar has been lowered' and it is becoming accepted as the norm that we do more with less - especially back at peacetime location.
This is fine when you have a whole load of people with 1000s of hours to fall back on, but I look around me and there are not that many experienced 'dudes' left.
I will stop waffling - but am I being a wet pants of the Womans Auxillary Balloon Corps and should I just 'man up' and also accept the risk? What do you guys think is the minimum flying to keep both competent and current? Whether a FJ mate or rotary operator - competency is competency.
Is the 15 hrs per month NATO guidance 'old school'. How much can be transferred in to the Simulator? 10 hrs sim, 5 hrs aircraft? What happens if your sim is not mission configured with what you are fighting with on Ops or not on camp, base or station?
Sorry, to drivel on - but I welcome your thoughts.
FS :confused:
And maybe this kind of thread requires a sober head, but it has been playing on my mind for a while.
What is the definitive minimums for competency? I know that there are some international organisations that go 3 months between flying and still remain 'operational', but somewhere I know that there is a NATO STANAG that says 15 hrs a month (or 180 hrs a year) although I cannot find it.
My point is when the hierarchy 'take it on risk' that crews are not getting regular flying training what is the limit to which I say, I am sorry I as the aircraft captain/authorisor am not prepared to carry your risk as in the subsequent BOI you will be no where in sight Sir?
I do not want to be seen as the person that whinges, whines or 'lets go of the rope' but at the same time I do not want to be the person that knowingly is flying pre-deployment training sortie profiles bouncing off currencies (if even that - more like check ride to re-gain currency then crack on with demanding sorties).
My gut feeling is that because our previous high standard of currency/competency cannot be resourced because of where all of the resources are going (i.e. on Ops) then 'the bar has been lowered' and it is becoming accepted as the norm that we do more with less - especially back at peacetime location.
This is fine when you have a whole load of people with 1000s of hours to fall back on, but I look around me and there are not that many experienced 'dudes' left.
I will stop waffling - but am I being a wet pants of the Womans Auxillary Balloon Corps and should I just 'man up' and also accept the risk? What do you guys think is the minimum flying to keep both competent and current? Whether a FJ mate or rotary operator - competency is competency.
Is the 15 hrs per month NATO guidance 'old school'. How much can be transferred in to the Simulator? 10 hrs sim, 5 hrs aircraft? What happens if your sim is not mission configured with what you are fighting with on Ops or not on camp, base or station?
Sorry, to drivel on - but I welcome your thoughts.
FS :confused: