PDA

View Full Version : Stewart International (New York)


ORAC
29th Jan 2008, 10:43
Grauniad: New Airport in NY Could Ease Congestion (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,,-7263937,00.html)

NEW WINDSOR, N.Y. (AP) - The passenger terminal at Stewart International Airport used to be a parachute packing plant. One of the entry roads is lined with abandoned, boarded-up military barracks. New York City is more than 60 miles away. But the former Air Force base has a runway long enough to land a space shuttle, four times as much land as LaGuardia, half a billion dollars to work with and, perhaps, a bright future as a regional airport.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is converting the airport into what it hopes will be a state-of-the-art facility that attracts millions of travelers a year while serving as a relief valve for increasing congestion at Kennedy International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport and LaGuardia Airport. Officials also hope it can be an economic engine for New York. "Stewart can be kind of a beacon for a lot of things,'' said Anthony Shorris, executive director of the Port Authority, which has a 93-year lease on Stewart and runs the other three airports. "An anchor for growth in the Hudson Valley, a major reliever of the other airports, a cargo and job-generating facility for a new economic growth pattern, and a demonstration of the potential for sustainable development in aviation.''

Change is already unmistakable: A new exit off Interstate 84 and wide new access roads now lead to the airport. A 350-space parking lot went up in three weeks and new chairs abound in the baggage claim area.

The Port Authority took over the airport in November and said it would spend $500 million on it over the next 10 years. Diannae Ehler, the airport's general manager, said with the arrival of several new airlines, Stewart will serve about 900,000 passengers this year, triple its 2006 volume. It could handle as many as 1.5 million, she said, and she is busily recruiting more carriers, passengers and cargo. Currently, the only international flights coming into Stewart are charters, but Ehler said she will talk to overseas airlines during a trip to Europe next month.

Shorris foresees 3 million annual passengers using Stewart within a few years. The attractions will include an easy trip to the airport, plenty of parking, comfortable terminals and flights taking off on schedule, he said.

Dan Hurwitz, a 60-year-old math teacher at Skidmore College, recently drove 100 miles to Stewart from his home in Saratoga Springs because a flight to Sarasota, Fla., was cheaper from Stewart than from the Albany airport closer to his home. "Parking was really easy in the credit-card lot,'' he said. ``They told me to be here two hours early but everything's fast. I could have come an hour later.''

The airlines, too, say they appreciate the differences between Stewart and the big airports. Skybus, which began flying out of Stewart to Columbus, Ohio, finds the airport "a perfect fit,'' said spokesman Bob Tenenbaum. "Skybus turns its flights around in 25 minutes,'' he said. "At Kennedy or Newark or LaGuardia, you can easily wait 25 minutes just to land.'' Skybus is adding flights to Greensboro, N.C., next month and expects to expand further at Stewart, Tenenbaum said.

Shorris has pledged to build terminals, baggage equipment, offices, stores and restaurants that do not produce greenhouse gas emissions and which produce or support enough green energy to begin to offset the emissions generated by the planes.''

Steve Rosenberg, a senior vice president at the environmental group Scenic Hudson, sits on a citizens advisory panel on Stewart. He said his group wants to make sure that Shorris' goals are met and that his comments are "not merely a catch phrase.''

eastern wiseguy
29th Jan 2008, 12:28
Soooooo...if Ryanair ever venture across the Atlantic....

Kazamb
29th Jan 2008, 19:10
As I remember use dto be owned by the National Express Group until they disposed of it recently.

StbdD
30th Jan 2008, 02:14
Interestingly, the efforts to make Stewart into a major airport date back to 1970 and included a huge land acquisition as a noise buffer area for SSTs.

From various sources:

In 1970 Stewart Air Force Base was deactivated and acquired by New York State. In 1971, New York State acquired by eminent domain nearly 8,000 acres of farmland bordering Stewart Air Force base for the planned development of a fourth super-airport to service metropolitan New York. Stewart did become a commercial airport but all the land proved unnecessary for runways and super-sonic noise buffer.

In 1999 New York Governor George Pataki transferred about 5,400 acres to the Department of Environmental Conservation, and allowed the Empire State Development Corporation, (New York State's development arm), to offer 1,200 acres for development.

At the end of the 20th century it became the first U.S. commercial airport to be privatized when UK-based National Express Group was awarded a 99-year lease on the airport. It recently postponed plans to change the facility's name after considerable local opposition, and then announced plans to sell its rights to the airport. On January 25, 2007, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey board voted to acquire the remaining 93 years of the lease, effectively ending the privatization experiment. It took over control of the airport on November 1, 2007.

MarkD
30th Jan 2008, 21:16
Stewart is about 70 miles from downtown - that makes Newark (20 miles) look nearby. It doesn't help that a lot of the catchment south of there is taken up with West Point and other military reservations.

oldhippie
31st Jan 2008, 10:37
Stewart can indeed expand, so relieving pressure on the other three NYC area airports, but the essential high-speed rapid transit link to the city is a long way off. The current passenger service up the Hudson valley stops on the 'wrong' side of the Hudson, at Beacon, meaning a 20 minute shuttle over the Beacon bridge. Worse, this very lovely line follows the contours of the Hudson, ruling out significant speed increases. Current journeys are 75 minutes at best to downtown. Alternatives: there is a freight line that runs along the west side of the Hudson, which could be upgraded, and even get a spur into the airport. But it would cost a bundle to upgrade. America is not train-friendly, and there would be problems where it runs through protected rural areas and residential areas. Until the powers that be develop an alternative, you're stuck with the already crowded freeway. I'd reckon two hours or more to Manhattan on a bad day. Stewart will however, work beautifully as a large regional airport for the mid-Hudson valley . So if you need to go north of the city itself, it's a good option.

TRY2FLY
31st Jan 2008, 18:07
What about an underground (subway) link. Would be costly but not impossible.

isa kite
1st Feb 2008, 07:04
It's about 60 miles, so a subway link would never be considered. The rail trip is pleasant, though, as the Hudson valley is quite scenic -once you're clear of NY itself, which happens fairly quickly, it's mostly rural, with views right across the river from the train.

Wiggly Bob
1st Feb 2008, 10:41
Doesn't Skybus currently fly in here? Another tenious link to Ryanair. Maybe it will become NYC South one day?

egnxema
1st Feb 2008, 11:00
NYC South?:rolleyes:

Ever looked at a map?:ugh: