Brilliant Stuff
27th Jan 2008, 17:11
Now which bit by law is the correct bit i.e. which one counts in front of the bench?
For example I have a ATPL (H) which after the renewal or change of address out of the blue under ratings gains a Flight Instructor rating or your Multicrew Instrument rating has no restrictions and therefore is on paper an IR without restrictions? Does this mean because of a typo back at CAA house I have now gained two new ratings (in date) without even doing the necessary flight tests and groundschool? Would these stand up in the courts? Or would they say the licence you hold in your hand is only a copy of what is held back at CAA house?
In other words due to the CAA sending me a licence with "extra" ratings am I at fault and responsible or them or them?
IMHO since they will not let me pilot a new aircraft without the rating being in my grubby hands it would make me think they gave me a "free" rating which I can use.
Now I would not dream of using these phantom ratings in anger but other people of lesser moral fibre might.
Discuss
Regards BS
For example I have a ATPL (H) which after the renewal or change of address out of the blue under ratings gains a Flight Instructor rating or your Multicrew Instrument rating has no restrictions and therefore is on paper an IR without restrictions? Does this mean because of a typo back at CAA house I have now gained two new ratings (in date) without even doing the necessary flight tests and groundschool? Would these stand up in the courts? Or would they say the licence you hold in your hand is only a copy of what is held back at CAA house?
In other words due to the CAA sending me a licence with "extra" ratings am I at fault and responsible or them or them?
IMHO since they will not let me pilot a new aircraft without the rating being in my grubby hands it would make me think they gave me a "free" rating which I can use.
Now I would not dream of using these phantom ratings in anger but other people of lesser moral fibre might.
Discuss
Regards BS