PDA

View Full Version : Cargo slowdown - various from Reuters


CargoRat2
21st Jun 2001, 11:35
Lufthansa Cargo cuts capacity due to market drop
By Paul Needham
FRANKFURT, June 20 (Reuters) - Lufthansa Cargo AG said on Wednesday it has cut its overall weekly freight capacity by about 200 tonnes due to the slowing international air cargo market but denied it had grounded any freighters.
The Deutsche Lufthansa AG <LHAG.F> logistics subsidiary was cancelling selected flights or using smaller aircraft to destinations suffering weaker demand at short notice and on a flexible basis, spokesman Dietrich Seidl told Reuters in response to an enquiry.
These cuts, affecting mostly the U.S. and Asian markets, had been made over the last two months in reaction to the weakening market and would continue for the foreseeable future, he said.
"We have reduced capacity to the extent of two freighters a week. Flights have been reduced at weak times, for example, during the week," Seidl explained.
Lufthansa Cargo operates a fleet of 22 freighter aircraft, including 14 MD11F with capacity of some 90-95 tonnes and eight B747-200Fs with capacity of some 100-110 tonnes.
Two freighters are thus equivalent to about 200 tonnes of weekly capacity while the airline's fleet has total operating capacity of 2,000-2,200 tonnes.
Seidl denied Lufthansa Cargo had grounded any aircraft and stressed the carrier wanted to keep all its aircraft operating so that it could react quickly once the market picked up again.
The capacity reductions following a clear slump in worldwide air cargo traffic since early this year which has affected the big three markets of North America, Europe and Asia.
Lufthansa Cargo reiterated on June 13 that it expected a fall in operating profits this year due to worsening market conditions after seeing a fall in volumes and load factors over the first four months of the year.
In recent weeks, major U.S cargo carriers have announced large-scale job layoffs to cut costs, including Atlas Air <CGO.N> (300), CNF <CNF.N> unit Emery (900) and Airborne Inc <ABF.N> (640) as well as Polar Air Cargo (60)
Atlas which operates 37 Boeing 747 freighters is withdrawing six from service until the market improves while Emery is cutting its fleet to 38 aircraft from 54.

NCA cuts weekly Tokyo-NY freighter flights by one to 14
NEW YORK, June 20 (Reuters) - Nippon Cargo Airlines reduced its weekly freighters between Tokyo and the U.S. to 14 from 15 due to weak market conditions, an NCA spokesman said Monday.
"We're combining one freighter flight on Tuesdays," said Peter Diefenbach, NCA's assistant director for the sales and marketing department in New York.
The airline, which uses Boeing 747-200s, is also "canceling selective flights," Diefenbach said.
Previously on Tuesdays, NCA flew a freighter from Tokyo to Chicago and then on to John F. Kennedy Airport in New York. Another freighter flew from Tokyo to the U.S. West Coast.
Now one freighter is flying from Tokyo to San Francisco and then on to JFK, Diefenbach said. This combined flight cuts NCA's weekly frequencies to 14.
"The market is worse than ever," Diefenbach said. "I thought it would get better," but that has not happened.
With summer starting, Diefenbach worries the situation could stay bad.
"You have more passenger planes in the summer with belly hold space for cargo. They're giving it away."

Atlas Air cuts ground staff, fleet as cargo mkt weakens
NEW YORK, June 19 (Reuters) - Atlas Air, a unit of air cargo carrier Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc on Tuesday said it will cut its ground staff by 200 employees and take a second-quarter charge as the current economic slowdown diminishes demand for its services.
Atlas Air also said it would decrease its fleet service levels by up to six aircraft "until more normalized flying utilisation can be resumed."
CEO Richard Shuyler said, "The sudden and precipitous drop in air freight demand that our customers have seen since the first quarter requires that we take very immediate and decisive action... for the long-term."
"The global extent of the current economic downturn has become far wider and deeper than most observers had expected, and has occurred far more quickly than anyone anticipated," he added in a statement.
"Not only are our customers no longer flying at levels that exceed guaranteed minimums, but many are having difficulty even achieving those minimums," he said.
"As a result, the operational and maintenance spare aircraft in our fleet that would normally be used to generate excess flying are sitting largely idle. In addition, two aircraft that we recently took back from a customer that has filed for bankruptcy have not been placed elsewhere due to the current economic environment," Shuyler said.
"This has caused Atlas Air to re-evaluate its fleet needs and to take these aircraft out of service."
Last month, it announced a furlough of 105 of its crewmembers and some flight crew took advantage of voluntary reduction opportunities offered by Atlas so that no flight crewmembers are affected by today's announcement, it said.
But it "is continuing to evaluate its crew staffing requirements," the statement added.
The Purchase, New York, company said it will take a second-quarter charge of between $40 million and $50 million.
Atlas Air said it expects to break even in the second quarter and earn between 90 cents and $1.10 per share for the year before one-time charges.
Analysts had expected earnings of about 49 cents for the quarter and $2.24 for the year, according to Wall Street research firm Thomson Financial/First Call.
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings' shares closed at $19.09 on the Nasdaq on Monday, just above a 52-week low of $19.05.


------------------
rgds Rat

RampTramp
21st Jun 2001, 13:49
CR2, not good news but unfortunately true. All the integrators are suffering as well although it seems to be worse in the US. The only consolation is that these things are cyclic, the problem is hanging on to what work there is, keeping both the individual & corporate heads above water & hanging in there until the upturn comes!

Good luck to us all!

------------------
I'm not old, I was just born too early

411A
22nd Jun 2001, 06:18
It boggles the mind to think that the Atlas pilots have voted to strike in this environment. Are most of these guys new to the industry or what?
It may well be a case of...don't confuse us with facts, our mind is made up.

CargoRat2
22nd Jun 2001, 12:40
Having followed the various Atlas threads over the months, can't help wondering if there is a hidden agenda here.
Is the downturn being used as an excuse to give the crews a good kicking for unionizing?


------------------
rgds Rat

raitfaiter
22nd Jun 2001, 18:10
411a:
SOG

Beaver Driver
22nd Jun 2001, 18:11
411a

NEW YORK, June 21 (Reuters) - Atlas Air (NYSE:CGO - news) is maintaining the delivery programme for four 120 tonne capacity Boeing Co (NYSE:BA - news) 747-400 freighters due in 2002, a company spokeswoman said on Thursday.

She was responding to questions by Reuters after the carrier said on Tuesday it was taking six of its 37 Boeing 747 freighters out of service until airfreight market conditions returned to normal.

Atlas is cutting 200 groundstaff after laying off 105 flightcrew on May 11 and is taking a $40 to $50 million second quarter charge.

"The four jets are still on order,'' said Atlas spokeswoman Vicki Foster. The jets were ordered before the downturn in the global airfreight market, which has become more acute in the last two months.

Foster added the carrier was still considering purchases of medium-range freighters -- Boeing 767s or Airbus A300 -- which would be used on lower capacity routes.

Atlas also continues to be interested in the 150 tonne capacity Airbus Industrie A380, which could be available from 2008 onwards, she said.

In April, Richard Shuyler, the air cargo carrier's chief executive officer, said Atlas would make its decision on whether to buy A380s in six months.

Atlas Air is a unit of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc. It leases its freighters to other major airlines on ACMI (aircraft, crew maintenance, insurance) basis to provide extra cargo lift, but has been hit by sharply lower demand.

"Not only are our customers no longer flying at levels that exceed guaranteed minimums, but many are having difficulty in even achieving those minimums,'' CEO Richard Shuyler said on June 19.

Of significance is the fact that Atlas did not cut any AACS jobs and is stll going through with the formation of GSS, and the multi-million dollar hanger construction in MIA (even though they don't have a base down here any more due to the cuts). NONE of the VP's were given their walking papers and NO ONE in management took any cut in salary. Go back to your golf game.

411A
22nd Jun 2001, 18:49
CargoRat2---
Absolutely, the Atlas management sure does not want a union on the property.
And, I definately think the likes of BeaverDriver et al have NO idea about the economics of airline management.
They also seem to idolize the late MC yet throw darts at the present CEO, but seem to conveniently forget that it was MC who hired the guy in the first place.

fr8k9
22nd Jun 2001, 19:12
Beaver,
forgot to mention that of the 3 sections of Atlas world Holdings the only one taking severe losses since it was started over a year ago and continuing with terrible losses is AACS(By the only part of Atlas not affected by layoffs). The other 2 parts of Atlas holdings have been and continue to make profits for the company and both took layoffs in this the latest page of union busting 101.

Rat,
Most definetly there is a hidden agenda if you want to call it that. Although it is not very hidden, The management of this company has never intended to negotiate to a contract(read Continental, Eastern, Peoples express, Texas Air). Or just call it Lorenzo corporate raping. Atlas Furloughed 72FE's and only 35FO's. I've checked the senority list's and it is just like it reads the company furloughed more FE's than FO's simply as an attempt to destroy solidarity. Now The FE's are flying 24 and 25 days a month because we don't have enough. So we consider these FE's hostage's and unless something good comes from negotiations in the next couple of sessions it is my opinion that it is time to strike and stop these Lorenzo clones from continuing to destroy the airline business.
remember the 107 hostages

Engineer
22nd Jun 2001, 19:18
Is it just me or is there a conspiracy theory that the Atlas/GSS/AACS debate will eventually find it way into all forums on this network.

Surely you gentlemen/Ladies have talked the talk to death so now the only thing is to walk the walk. Actions speak louder than word
good luck on your forth coming strike if that is the avenue you take hope you are not to late

Beaver Driver
22nd Jun 2001, 19:24
411a

If you mean airline management of the 1920's back when you were doing it, you are right. Airline management of today is a bloodsport perpetrated by the likes of Lorenzo, Ichan, Bergt, et. al. If you want to include yourself, go ahead. Airline managers of today only understand one thing.....money. There is no corporate loyalty (witness AACS, Atlas furloughs, Atlas layoffs, Com Air, etc. etc) the only way to make an impact on these guys is to cost them money.

Do you think I want to strike? NONE of us do. It is, however, the only way to make these guys understand that we need to be paid more, and need better work rules. And to make them realize that without us they would have no 5.3 million dollars a year(salary and bonuses). We have not had a pay raise in 8 years. Not since the beginning. THEY (and you) need to take economics 1A again. And while they are at it they should take Ethics in Business again.

While we all agree that MC was not a people person, he did have a dream, and obviously that dream died with him. He never would have allowed Atlas to get in this position in the first place.

[This message has been edited by Beaver Driver (edited 22 June 2001).]

411A
22nd Jun 2001, 19:54
BeaverDriver--
Would agree with you point about needing a raise, with your record profits last year you do need one.
However, was it not MC's idea to start AACS in the first place? MC may well have had a dream, but I suspect it was not for the benefit of Atlas pilots.

tailtankhvy
27th Jun 2001, 01:40
In Canada we recently lost an air freight company flying A300-B4 aircraft. They were doing the overfill for Emery Worldwide. Now there is no overfill, so no work for ICC at present.

freightdoggy dog
27th Jun 2001, 02:27
Heavylift are putting 2xA300s on standby in CGN and LGG end of this week.

Engineer
27th Jun 2001, 03:28
FDD
Have HLA been handing out p45 for the crews then or are these active standby's

Is JR and BF still there?

freightdoggy dog
28th Jun 2001, 02:14
active standbys, which means the LMs will be working harder as they were shut out of the DHL contracts. However hear that most of crews have cvs in at ACL at EMA who have just taken Schreiners 2 A300s. Who wants to sit all day in LGG unless they have their welly boots with them!!!

Hunter58
28th Jun 2001, 15:56
Beaver

what you think are Atlas' customers going to say if you strike? With loads of freighters parked around the planet, they have a lot of options, and I could immagine they kiss Atlas good-bye then. Which would kick Shuyler out of his seat, as the Wall Street 'investors' who put money into the company won't like what happens, but it could also be the beginning of the end.

I mean, it's certainly up to you guys to decise if you wan to strike and if you don't, but the consequences might be far worse for you than you think.

------------------
There's nothing like a three-holer...

Sir_Fly-a-Lot
30th Jun 2001, 21:31
Isn't it something ? One day you're flying your ass of, the next day it all turns to sh*t ! (excuzes le mot)

Any news about DHL recruiting at EMA ?
Cheers, SF.

HalesAndPace
1st Jul 2001, 00:39
Engineer, yes to both JR & BF (Country Club directors!!)

Engineer
1st Jul 2001, 01:13
H&P
thaxs are they still on Belslow

HalesAndPace
1st Jul 2001, 01:40
Engineer, no problem; yes, again.

StbdD
1st Jul 2001, 21:41
Hunter

I believe you are correct in your reasoning on the current Atlas issue. However, if Atlas can't adapt to the realities of being a big player in the world aviation market should it continue to exist? Those realities include paying proper wages and establishing equitable work rules for its employees.

If the company folds due to the pressure of a strike what have the crews really lost? They were getting royally screwed in the best of times and only the possibility of a decent contract kept most of them there. If the contract is not forthcoming they will strike. If the company doesn't respond properly it folds. Keep in mind that while an aircrew strike may drive Atlas out of business, paying the salaries and agreeing to the workrules requested by the union certainly will not.

I suspect the individual crewmembers at Atlas are very aware of both possibile outcomes and have planned for each of them. The point is why prolong the pain? A strike has the certain outcome of ending it one way or another and they can get on with their lives.

Good luck to them.

Huck
1st Jul 2001, 23:20
In other words, better to die on your feet than live on your knees....

Hunter58
2nd Jul 2001, 12:49
I just wanted to make you aware of that. Not that anybody says after Atlas went down because of a pilot strike: 'Well, we didn't know!'. Whether wou strike or not is entirely up to you.

------------------
There's nothing like a three-holer...

Beaver Driver
5th Jul 2001, 08:55
The latest words are that Atlas is going to furlough another 100 or so pilots (sounds like they bought the Fred Smith script). All this whiile continuing to hire and train AACS pilots, and continuing to make a profit. It's real obvious that Atlas managers would rather spend time playing head games with their employees, and messing up their employees lives, rather than sellng their lift and making this company a going concern.

What a bunch of losers we have managing this company. It's time to crap or get off the pot. Do they really want to be an airline or just another retired BA gentlemans flying club.

I think we need a pilot in the CEO position, or at the very least, a salesman, as a bean counter just ain't hacking the program. RS is neither a salesman, a pilot, or a manager, and he should quit while he still has a job.

411A
5th Jul 2001, 09:09
What percentage of the stock is held by the employees? IF a reasonable ammount, get together with some of the other institutional investors and see what you (combined) can do about it. This has been tried with other carriers (the old National Airlines was one) with some success. But, takes careful planning.

StbdD
5th Jul 2001, 10:55
The amount of employee stock ownership is considerable but not overwhelming. Good thought tho. It probably won't work as desired in this instance.

Good Luck to the crews when they strike.

GlueBall
5th Jul 2001, 17:59
With such miserly pay there is no discretionary income to buy company stock.
Besides, share value has been ripped in half and continues to tumble. Buy what? Operating certificate? Office equipment? Airplanes are leased!

Hunter58
5th Jul 2001, 18:08
How about finding another job? Even if it's right seat driver in a 737-500 going from Chicago to Duluth and back, doesn't that sound more secure? And isn't that about the same money, if not more? I don't know, but would that be a possibility?

As to what I hear Atlas has some big plans with a competitor, and they lost their sales guy in Asia...!

------------------
There's nothing like a three-holer...

Huck
5th Jul 2001, 23:52
WHICH competitor?

clamdigger
6th Jul 2001, 18:37
i wonder why aamt hasn't announced the 3 year, 3 aircraft (-200's) deal with TNT ? basically worldwide servive.....africa, south america, states, far east etc....the schedule is posted, has been seen by many atlas pilots and is to start this month...

Hunter58
6th Jul 2001, 20:44
Huck

I could tell you, but after that I have to kill you, because you know... And I don't really want to do that.

Clam

Weren't there cases of schedules out for bidding and no actual flying happening as the marketing guys overestimated their sales effort a bit in the past?

------------------
There's nothing like a three-holer...

clamdigger
6th Jul 2001, 22:41
the schedules i/we saw looked to be a route schedule....no times...just departure airports and destinations....it also had "atlas" written all over it....don't know much more than that....

PrettyBoy
9th Jul 2001, 11:47
Although I read the posts about Atlas and their obviously disgruntled pilots with keen interest, it gets a bit tedious when they have to "butt in" on every conceivable thread. There are plenty threads where you can regurgle your frustrations regarding your company. What was the subject again????