PDA

View Full Version : Spatial Disorientation article in Sunday Age


scrambler
15th Dec 2007, 21:57
From todays age

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/oops-and-downs-air-of-unreality-can-be-plane-scary/2007/12/15/1197568332270.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

Is this article designed to educate or scare the average punter. Perhaps they should have pointed out that by jettisoning the wings the problem is removed?



William Birnbauer
December 16, 2007

AS YOU prepare to fly off somewhere for Christmas, consider this: there is a chance your pilot once thought he was perched on the wing of his plane watching himself fly it.

Or, as happens more commonly, he may have believed the plane was pitching up or down when it was level or thought it was going straight when it was turning. He may have experienced what aviation doctors call the "knife edge" and "giant hand" illusions.

In the first, pilots sense that their aircraft is positioned precariously in space and extremely sensitive to the controls. The giant hand illusion is the opposite: pilots feel the plane is immovable in the air and unresponsive to controls — that a giant hand is holding it aloft.

These are some of the more bizarre manifestations of a potentially dangerous phenomenon known as spatial disorientation, which the United States Federal Aviation Administration says is the inability to tell which way is up.

In 1999 spatial disorientation (SD) was blamed for the plane crash in which John F. Kennedy jnr and his wife died in a night flight over water near Martha's Vineyard, in Massachusetts.

Almost every career pilot will experience some form of the phenomenon, says an aviation medicine expert, David Newman, who recently completed a study of SD and its role in accidents for the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

"If a pilot flies long enough as a career, or even a hobby, there is almost no chance that he or she will escape experiencing at least one episode of SD," he says. "Looked at another way, pilots can be considered to be in one of two groups: those who have been disorientated, and those who will be."

International studies show that spatial disorientation was responsible for between 6% and 32% of major aviation accidents, and between 15% and 26% of fatal accidents.

A report by the former Australian Bureau of Air Safety Investigation, which examined night take-off accidents between 1979 and 1993, found that of the 35 accidents recorded, 15 involved spatial disorientation as a primary factor.

Ray Cronin, one of Australia's most experienced pilots and instructors, is only too aware of the risks. He estimates he has experienced SD half a dozen times over more than three decades in the industry. He says that when visual references disappear, such as occurs in cloud or at night, inexperienced pilots have only 20 seconds before losing control.

Mr Cronin, who owns Kestrel Aviation, said that without visual references pilots may not believe they were flying on their sides or were in a spiral dive — despite what their instruments showed.

"That's when you have this mental conflict and you break out into a sweat," he said. "It's the ultimate discipline. You've got to pull yourself together, and say the information in front of me is reliable."

Dr Newman told The Sunday Age that although less likely than with pilots, passengers could also experience SD, but they were usually preoccupied with meals or entertainment. Passengers may feel they are going straight when they are actually turning.

So why does SD occur? Dr Newman explains that humans normally can accurately determine which way is up thanks to three sensory systems most of us take for granted: sight, the balance organs of the inner ear (vestibular system) and what are colloquially known as "seat-of-the-pants" sensors.

These combine to feed information to the brain. With these we determine our position within fixed horizontal (the Earth's surface), and vertical (the force of gravity) co-ordinates. The visual system provides about 80% of the raw orientation data so that when it is dark, or the weather is bad, pilots rely on the remaining 20%, split evenly between vestibular and "seat-of-the-pants" sensors. The latter is a pressure sensor in our joints, tendons, ligaments, muscles and skin that tells the brain that we are upright.

The problem, says Dr Newman, is that these two complex systems are prone to illusions and misinterpretation. And none was designed to work in the air. Dr Newman's report describes numerous illusions that the industry has given descriptive terms, such as the graveyard spin, the leans, and the dark-night take-off or pitch-up.

Rare illusions such as the pilot watching himself flying from the wing-tip were associated with feelings of unreality and detachment.

"While seemingly bizarre, these illusions are generally associated with high-altitude flight, where the pilot has a relatively low-level workload. Under such fish-bowl conditions, the brain can wander and generate these strange illusions." While well recognised in aviation, most people were not aware of the condition, and that's not a bad thing, according to Dr Newman.

"Do we want passengers worrying that the pilots are going to get an illusion? I mean, people wouldn't fly if they thought it was going to happen," he said. "It's really the same style of problem as hypoxia, a lack of oxygen, which is just a function of going flying. We know how to deal with it."

Dr Newman said the prevalence of SD was underestimated. Pilots often were reluctant to report it in case they lose their licence. When pilots died in plane crashes, it was difficult to positively blame SD.

Lost in space
■Spatial disorientation happens when a pilot loses a sense of up and down, or is unable to correctly interpret aircraft attitude, altitude or airspeed.

■It usually happens when flying into bad weather. Low or no visibility may block out external visual horizon.

■When the pilot cannot see a horizon there is a "drift in the inner ear", which, if left uncorrected, can lead to the pilot turning the plane without realising it.

■Mistakes in the turn about any axis can build at a rate of 0.2 to 0.3 degrees per second.

■If the pilot is not trained to use gyroscopic flight instruments, these errors build to a point where the plane enters a steep diving turn known as a graveyard spiral.

■During the time leading up to and well into the manoeuvre, the pilot is not aware that he is turning, convinced all along that he is flying straight.

Icarus53
15th Dec 2007, 22:19
Who here thinks they would lose their license if they got the leans??? Who would bother reporting a case of spacial disorientation (given that it is a completely normal reaction of the human sensory system to the unnatural environment of instrument flight?

Why did they troop up to Mangalore to ask a pilot - The Age is right next to YMEN/YMML?

Can't wait for the next article on boogeymen.

Capt Wally
16th Dec 2007, 00:35
........oh brother !!..........spare us please !!..........am wondering what all that IFR trainig was for where you are taught (amongst other things) to believe yr instruments when visual clues are not available, & like already said, there is the 'wing jettison' facility should all else fail; to get the job (of dying !!) over & done with quickly!:bored:

Sure they can quote numerous facts (fiction) & figures saying the dangers of this insidious effect but at the end of the day it's humans who fly in planes operated by humans & there in lies the risks. CFIT is a big one these days (probably 'cause it's more recognized these days than ever before ) with zillions spent on training but still it just happens, again 'cause we are human!
Nobody is denying that SD exists but it is manageable & therefore an acceptable risk.

Capt Wally:-)

troppont
16th Dec 2007, 01:21
why is this a big risk in airliner aircraft flying passengers? Aren't there 3 auto pilots flying the thing from 300' above?

if a pilot does feel SD what does he do? the auto pilot has the plane and the other pilot would be fine, and telling him its all good

bushy
16th Dec 2007, 01:35
It's easy to fix. All you have to do is reset the altimeter so that it reads zero. Then you get out and go home.

Monopole
16th Dec 2007, 01:38
SD extends beyond flying....
I have the leans right now :uhoh::uhoh:

Pinky the pilot
16th Dec 2007, 01:43
Reminds me of the 'spin recovery procedure' sign in a bar somewhere.....
1.If spin commences, immediately apply full opposite eyeball.

2.Ease head forward slowly.

3. When rotation stops, centralise glass and refill!
:ok::ok::ok:

Howard Hughes
16th Dec 2007, 02:30
In 1999 spatial disorientation (SD) was blamed for the plane crash in which John F. Kennedy jnr and his wife died in a night flight over water near Martha's Vineyard, in Massachusetts.
So nothing to do with being a VFR pilot in IMC then?:rolleyes:

Cap'n Arrr
16th Dec 2007, 05:06
■If the pilot is not trained to use gyroscopic flight instruments, these errors build to a point where the plane enters a steep diving turn known as a graveyard spiral.Basic IF 101... trust your instruments. CASA licence requirements... X hours of IF in the aircraft.

Next time you're on an airliner and neither pilot up front has been instrument trained, well, it doesn't happen does it?

William Birnbauer, I'm fairly certain he's written a few other VERY POOR articles on flying, or other "news" in general.

I reckon I could be a journo today... how's this?

[I]BLINK AND YOU MISS IT
by Cap'n Arrr [in the true journalistic style of the Great, Mystical and All-Round Excellent Journalist, William Birnbauer]

Scientific studies have proven that the average driver blinks up to 20 times a minute, with the potential to create a horrific accident involving a busload of orphans, a truck carrying a nuclear bomb AND cyanide, or even a schoolyard of bunny rabbits!

Dr Smithy McSmithson explains: "Well, yes when a person blinks they obviously can't see while their eyes are closed, but..." [cut off before explaining what he actually means]

So according to this highly experienced doctor, every time a driver blinks (especially an under 25 male) they are intentionally blocking out all vision of the road around them. You could be trying to cross the road as one of these hoons approaches the crossing!!!

"Hoon behaviour is a serious problem on our roads," says Police Superintendant John Smith. "We need to take action now to avoid any more horrendous incidents, and we are putting extra patrols out on the roads to help catch hoons" [SupInt talking about an unrelated matter, but lets not let the origin of quotes get in the way shall we?]

According to ATSB statistics, 100% of all drivers involved in collisions, including Bob McBogan, who hit a little old lady at such speed that she struck the substation, shorting out the entire western suburbs of Sydney with her false teeth, admitted to having blinked at some stage while driving.

The sociopathic drivers who blink while driving must be taken off our roads immediately! "It's only a matter of time," said some random guy on a completely unrelated topic. A matter of time indeed.

Blinking facts:
If you blink, you cannot see while your eyes are closed.
100% of drivers involved in accidents admitted to blinking.
97% of all sociopathic killers have been observed blinking.
Most of the pprune public think William Birnbauer should check his facts before publishing some sensationalist, bullsh** story on something covered in PPL Human Factors.
Most jounalists are reluctant to report substantiated, real facts to the public, when bs makes it so much more interesting.If you know of anyone who blinks while driving, contact The Age on 1800 THE AGE, or email us. More

LaTus
16th Dec 2007, 07:29
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, don't we already know all this?

Not like this information is some spectacular break through.

LaTus
16th Dec 2007, 07:37
'Low or no visibility may block out external visual horizon.'

Just another otherwise unemployable person who's been given a laptop.
Maybe oneday he'll lick enough balls to get a job with a current affairs program.

AirSic
16th Dec 2007, 10:25
Another definition of a moron using valuable oxygen..............

Journalistic Integrity!:}

flying-spike
16th Dec 2007, 21:49
Why am I learning all this blinking SD information when I still haven't been taught how to use the wing detach mechanism?

Icarus53
17th Dec 2007, 00:32
Cap'n Arrr

Bravo:D

I just wish I could be bothered to commit to my derision in similar fashion!

ABX
17th Dec 2007, 00:40
flying spike,

Why am I learning all this blinking SD information when I still haven't been taught how to use the wing detach mechanism?

All in good time, stop being in such a hurry, the wing detachment module (WDM), is only taught as part of an integrated Advanced Handling course.

Its people like yourself who end up getting in trouble by using the wing detachment mechanism without proper training. When used carelessly the WDM can result in an asymmetric detachment, leading to an uncontrollable spin.

Book yourself in for Advanced Handling mate.

flying-spike
17th Dec 2007, 01:36
With my tongue firmly in both cheeks (not a pretty picture) I think the only ones guilty of "advanced handling" are these cretinous journos! Besides, I am morally opposed to the term "disorientation". How are we going to offend our northern neighbours next?

TCFOR
17th Dec 2007, 01:43
"So nothing to do with being a VFR pilot in IMC then?:rolleyes:"

Correct, it was nothing to do with IMC. The JFK jnr fatal was in night VMC. He lost the horizon over the sea due to haze, and not being IFR trained, suffered a classic SD episode. The report stated that if he had tracked closer to the coast where many lights were visible, instead of direct over the water, he would have had sufficient visual reference and been ok.

Monopole
17th Dec 2007, 01:58
This is gonna open a can of worms but.......

In my opinion if you have to rely on the AH and other instruments in order to maintain wings level due to lost the horizon over the sea due to haze then you are not in VMC and as a VFR pilot you should not be there :=

TCFOR
17th Dec 2007, 02:10
"then you are not in VMC and as a VFR pilot you should not be there :="

Practically I agree with you, but legally, show me where a low haze on the horizon is not VMC? The reason it killed JFK jnr was that it was at night. I bet there is not a single night rated pilot here with a decent number of hours who has not experienced a lost horizon in night VMC at some time, particularly over water.

TCFOR
17th Dec 2007, 02:25
"All in good time, stop being in such a hurry, the wing detachment module (WDM), is only taught as part of an integrated Advanced Handling course."

If I fly a biplane, do I need a special rating for the more complex wing detach procedure or will the standard one do?

Cap'n Arrr
17th Dec 2007, 02:28
No, theres just 2 levers instead of one. Simply twist and pull as part of your shutdown checks in a forced landing (allow slightly more time in a biplanes as there is an extra lever for the upper wing release module), and then you'll be safe from fire as, well, a plane with no wings:ok:

Diatryma
17th Dec 2007, 02:52
Dr. Newman's report is here:

http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/2007/B20070063.aspx



Nobody is denying that SD exists but it is manageable & therefore an acceptable risk.

"an acceptable risk" - I guess that depends on your point of view. I'm not sure the Ray family (amongst many others I'm sure) would agree. If this article was written on 7th July 2005 I wonder if the Mt. Hotham "accident" would have occurred at all.

Obviously it is not always totally "manageable", and perhaps it's a good thing that passengers are aware of these various phenomena - particularly if they have some ability to influence a pilot?


Di :oh:

UnderneathTheRadar
17th Dec 2007, 03:04
Ummm, Diatryma, you're not serious surely?

The risk is managed through such concepts as 'following procedures', 'flying the approach as depicted', 'flying above the terrain unless in the circling area'. Using such novel concepts results in 'acceptable risks'.

Have you been to a surgeon recently? These days they list every single possible side effect that has ever been observed or has been predicted to observe before getting you to sign your life away. Do you propose that in future, all passengers must demonstrate their ATPL exam results before being allowed to board so that they are aware of the risks that the pilot is exposed to but have been deemed acceptable?

Oversimplified scaremongering crap such as this article does nothing to inform or prepare passengers for the flight they are about to take. My theory on why air and rail accidents recieve so much coverage is quite simply because the average joe, when boarding, has no idea how to actually drive the plane/train to the desitination and so accepts that responsibility for their safety is no longer in their hands. Apart from the 'there is a very small chance we may crash', there is no intermediate level of knowledge that the punters can have which will let them accurately judge what is going on until you reach, say, an ATPL or equivilent.

UTR.

Diatryma
17th Dec 2007, 03:21
Ummm ..... I'm talking about the lives of numerous passengers - so yes I am serious!

:sad:

PilotHTR
17th Dec 2007, 04:04
Diatryma,

The Mt Hotham pilot may well have been SD'd....BUT he was well outside published procedures and crashed for that reason. UTR makes a valid point.

IFR training is all about managing the risk of SD - how to avoid/minimise it, recognise it, and how to deal with it i.e. trust the instruments and your IFR training.

Almost without fail, when I see/hear a media story these days on something I know a bit about, it's wildly off the mark. So when I read about something I'm not knowledgeable about, I tend to be very cynical about it. Because the vast majority of the readers are NOT aviation-savvy, this sort of drivel constitutes nothing more than space-filler scaremongering.

PHTR

Diatryma
17th Dec 2007, 04:25
PHTR,

Fair enough - and I agree with you and UTR in relation to your first point.

I just think if passengers in certain circumstances are more aware the various aspects and risks involved in flying into less than marginal conditions, the might be less inclined to try to influence pilots actions. Certainly most pilots worth their salt would not be influenced - but it does happen.

Is there really much in the article that is wrong? He seems to have based most of what he said on Newman's report or the aviation expert Ray Cronin.

I'm not usually one for sticking up for journalists, but in this case I think you guys might be being a bit hard on him.

IMHO.

Cheers,

Di :ok:

Sunfish
17th Dec 2007, 18:35
Spatial Disorientation is always waiting to bite you when you least expect it in my opinion....

I've copped it once for about fifteen seconds - on a perfectly still winters day at Point Cook. Low Grey overcast, low light, lots of haze, and I took off on 17 straight out over grey water with no wind/waves. Guess what? Once over water, no anchored ships and no horizon!

It's a weird feeling, not knowing which way is up, but a quick glance at the AH and a look over the shoulder at land fixed it. Did a few circuits and watched the same thing try to happen to me each time.

ABX
17th Dec 2007, 22:44
TCFOR,


If I fly a biplane, do I need a special rating for the more complex wing detach procedure or will the standard one do?


Not particularly, although it gets a bit time consuming on the Fokker Triplane. It is generally recommended to get a fair bit of practise using the WDM when flying multi-winged aircraft.

Note, specialist WDM training is required on swing-wing aircraft. Ask any pig driver.

Cheers,