Flight safety mag

[Murray Cod]

I just did a telephone survey for Flight Safety Magazine which asked questions about improvements , safety issues etc. But one of the questions asked how much I would pay for this magazine!!!
Looks like CASA is sniffing for even more coin.
See Safety does cost.
Murray Cod

[AerocatS2A]

And you told them, "I already pay for it through taxes, I would not be prepared to pay any more" right?

[Bula]

hit the nail on the head.

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

[P-air]

Could have quoted

"YOU CANT PUT A PRICE ON SAFETY"

[arkmark]

I so hate that air safety magazine - it's really only targeted at noobies.

With it's simplistic content it is hardly worth it as a freebie

[Pinky the pilot]

I'd be quite happy to pay a little more for an informative safety magazine.:ok:
Having said that, I shall be quite specific;
Bring back the old 'Aviation Safety Digest':ok: :ok:
To my mind it was far more professional, gave more information as to the cause probable or definitive, of accidents relevant to Australian Aviation, as most if not all were reports of accidents/incidents that occurred in Australia, but most importantly (as far as I'm concerned) it was laid out in plain, easily understood (and sometimes somewhat cold) language.

[Capn Bloggs]

Bring back the Flaming Liar. Dick can be the editor (again).

[Tinstaafl]

I pay *more* than it is worth in the usurious charges levied by CASA. I pay at *least* what it was worth if they returned to the sadly defunct Aviation Safety Digest.

In no way is the current, poor magazine a worthy replacement for what was lost.

[Dropt McGutz]

I thought the advertising was supposed to cover costs.