AVSEC
15th Feb 2007, 22:24
Guys any contributions would be welcome.
Why is it that a pax with a passport that has been studied by a consulate,found to be genuine and has had a visa issued within it,can then have the immigration authority,issue a fine against the airline the pax used,because they are of the opinion that the passport is of low quality/sub standard?
Since pax especially in Africa pay visa fees,should it not be the visa issuing consulate,and not the airline that should pay the fine?
Why are pax with genuine visas for travel to a destination,being returned and THE AIRLINE FINED because another endorsement on a previouse visit to the same destination,or another different destination is found to be irregular?
Isnt that penalising the airline for some other immmigration authority's error?Does this seem to have equity or balance to any of you?
I look forward to your comments or observations while on the job concerning this issue.
Why is it that a pax with a passport that has been studied by a consulate,found to be genuine and has had a visa issued within it,can then have the immigration authority,issue a fine against the airline the pax used,because they are of the opinion that the passport is of low quality/sub standard?
Since pax especially in Africa pay visa fees,should it not be the visa issuing consulate,and not the airline that should pay the fine?
Why are pax with genuine visas for travel to a destination,being returned and THE AIRLINE FINED because another endorsement on a previouse visit to the same destination,or another different destination is found to be irregular?
Isnt that penalising the airline for some other immmigration authority's error?Does this seem to have equity or balance to any of you?
I look forward to your comments or observations while on the job concerning this issue.