PDA

View Full Version : Thai / Air France incident 15 July


planeenglish
16th Jul 2006, 07:49
http://www.elpais.es/articulo/espana/avion/pasajeros/choca/aparcado/Barajas/produzcan/heridos/elpporesp/20060715elpepunac_4/Tes/
http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i262/planeenglish/recorte.jpg

ETOPS
16th Jul 2006, 09:29
And in English

http://etna.mcot.net/query.php?nid=23353

Dani
16th Jul 2006, 11:13
This is not an Air France aircraft, it belongs to Air Regional, which is AF subsidiary regional company.

Dani

southern duel
16th Jul 2006, 21:00
Looks like a little Fokker to me instead of a EMB.

Just one question though , The wingtip of a B747 would pass over the wingtip of a Fokker very easily so I would suggest that the wingtip of the B747 hit the Tail of the French aircraft. The picture also suggests this with the air france colour scheme in the picture which one would suggest comes from the tail.


Thoughts !!!

Off Stand
16th Jul 2006, 21:12
It is an EMB, the 744 took the tail clean off. It is being discussed in depth on the airliners.net forum.

Golf Charlie Charlie
17th Jul 2006, 01:04
Spotters or not, the aircraft was F-GOHC, which is an Embraer ERJ-135. Case closed.

I am Birddog
31st Jul 2006, 21:53
Does anyone have any information on when, why and how and who was at fault for this little taxiing incedent?
http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c26/iambirddog/thai.jpg
http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c26/iambirddog/thai1.jpg
http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c26/iambirddog/thai2.jpg
http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c26/iambirddog/thai3.jpg

Appreciated.

barryt
1st Aug 2006, 10:24
Think the answer to that is pretty obvious. If anything was taxiing in this incident, it must have been the 747 judging by the damage to it. Unless the smaller bird was pushed back into it...but you mentioned the word "taxi"..:rolleyes:

flyblue
1st Aug 2006, 19:11
It happened on the 15th of July. The 747 had left its parking at Terminal 1 and was taxiing towards the runway on the wrong taxi way. Pilots' mistake it seems, but then they taxied almost a Km without anyone noticing.

Onions
1st Aug 2006, 19:42
If they taxied almost a kilometer before anyone noticed how come the Thai aircraft is pictured above about 10 feet away? Did they come back to exchange insurance details??

Dan Air 87
1st Aug 2006, 20:12
I'd love to read the accident report. I hope there were a few witnesses to prove that it was nothing to do with the way that the French jet was parked. Will the Thai pilot lose his no claims bonus?

ehwatezedoing
2nd Aug 2006, 06:27
If they taxied almost a kilometer before anyone noticed how come the Thai aircraft is pictured above about 10 feet away? Did they come back to exchange insurance details??
Maybe because they did this Kilometer in the wrong taxiway/direction before hitting the tail :hmm:

London Mil
2nd Aug 2006, 06:50
As the doctor would say, "at least it's a clean break'.:hmm:

Taildragger67
2nd Aug 2006, 08:23
If they taxied almost a kilometer before anyone noticed how come the Thai aircraft is pictured above about 10 feet away? Did they come back to exchange insurance details??

I suggest the previous poster meant that the 747 entered the wrong taxiway and taxied almost a kilometer without incident before anyone noticed (ie. when they collided with the smaller aircraft). Not that they hit the smaller a/c and trundled on their merry way.

Onions
2nd Aug 2006, 08:23
Misunderstood previous post. Having re read I now understand.:\

I'll get my coat.

flyblue
2nd Aug 2006, 12:00
Sorry Onions, on re reading my post I realized it was (unintentionally) misleading. Indeed the 747 taxiied without anyone noticing he was on the wrong taxiway for almost a Km before hitting the ERJ.

Charles Darwin
2nd Aug 2006, 13:35
Grouphug!:E

Dan Air 87
2nd Aug 2006, 19:04
I wonder what the Control Tower said to the Thai pilot. Its easily done though. Sometimes the biggest danger to aircraft is not when they are flying-its when they are on the ground! If the bloody catering truck doesn't slam into the fuselage then something like this happens!

nivsy
3rd Aug 2006, 13:20
While being a "stick in the mud" - come on easily done? As a pax all we ask for is the competent people "up front" to take us safely from A to B - and I suppose tecnology and computerisation does so much of that these days in respect of the art of actually flying the aircraft its a bit of a bad show when they cant even taxi the darn things without hitting one another - or maybe I am just having an off day - I know accidents can happen etc etc.....:(

Taildragger67
3rd Aug 2006, 14:18
The Thai guy gets bonus points. Managed to take the other aircraft's tail clean off, without sustaining other damage to his own a/c :} . Unlike this relative amateur: http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/asiana-anc/photo.shtml :eek: :ok:

A written description of that fun & games: http://www.aviationpics.de/ramp/alaska/altext.htm

Dream Land
3rd Aug 2006, 14:34
Careful, the air disaster link is full of pop ups.:*

mansaloco
3rd Aug 2006, 15:52
Boeing or aint going, "Built tough"

Had this been a 380 we would be looking at a wing on the ground

planeenglish
3rd Aug 2006, 16:01
Hello everyone,

I was first told about this incident becasue it may have had something to do with lack of English language proficiency. Can anyone confirm this?

Also, not that it matters, but mansaloco, if it had been a A380 wouldn't the wing have cleared the other, considerably, smaller aircraft? Perhaps I didn't understand the comment.
Thank you,
PE

Something in French here (http://www.crash-aerien.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1708)...

FLR-PSA
3rd Aug 2006, 17:48
mansaloco: How can you support such a crazy statement?

I am Birddog
3rd Aug 2006, 19:56
Boeing or aint going, "Built tough"

Had this been a 380 we would be looking at a wing on the ground

:)

Oh common now!! I have flown in both types and Airbus as far ahead as the technology is, they are made out of paper. A passenger can't hold a drink on the tray without wearing during light to meduim chop!!!

You know it's true :=

You guy's are too much...this is funny!!! Please continue :D I'm enjoying this. :ok:

B A Lert
5th Aug 2006, 02:03
It sure gives a new meaning to 'tail strike'!! :D

Where, and when, did this happen?

planeenglish
5th Aug 2006, 04:47
B A Lert,

Here's one story. (http://etna.mcot.net/query.php?nid=23353) Then, here's what Thai says officially. (http://www.thaiair.com/About_Thai/Newsroom/Press_Release/Press_Year_2006/press0706_acc1.htm)

Best,
PE

MaxTOW
5th Aug 2006, 13:18
I can just imagine Maxwell Smart saying "Just didn't....miss by this much"....while handing his hands about two feet apart. Funny how there is a 1 km run before a 2 foot mishap. Poor bloke.:bored:

wub
5th Aug 2006, 17:36
How can Thai Corporate Communications say in their 'clarification' of the incident, that their 747 collided with the wing of a Fokker, when in fact it took the tail off an Embraer?

brain fade
5th Aug 2006, 23:04
As a 145 pilot, I'm just a wee bit worried that the tail snapped off rather than simply causing the Barbie to swing 'round.

Guess it must be true what they say about rudder reversal!:eek:

MoateAir
8th Aug 2006, 10:22
Ah, but you you should have seen the 27 other fokkers he taxied past before he hit this one.


Someone had to say it.....

Sir George Cayley
13th Aug 2006, 18:36
If you lurk carefully at the pictures, Hastings, you will perceive ne cest pas that there are some - how do you say - work in progress barriers to ze gauche of the Thai Djuumbo.

Could it be, mon ami, that there was a restriction temporaire of the width of the taxiway a ce moment which caused the leviathan to strike the aeroplane of Air France a mighty blow?

No doubt BEA will reveal all at the end of the Act quattre.

Sir George Cayley

old,not bold
14th Aug 2006, 16:19
Its easily done though.

Run that past me again, please?

Just how easy is it to swipe the tail off another aircraft in broad daylight?

I know it was quite a small one, but are eye tests a thing of the past?