capt.cynical
6th Apr 2006, 09:57
:suspect:
From Crikey.com.au
9. Time to shed light on Qantas's sweet deal for MPs
By Stephen Mayne, still yet to see a politician in the Qantas Club
The saga of Peter Costello's kids being upgraded to business class against their father's express directions for that flight home from LA in January raises plenty of questions about the culture within our national airline. We all know that airlines possess a commodity food, drink and comfortable travel away from the masses that is highly sought after so the big question is what they charge, or don't charge, for the service.
Back in December 1998, I was working in Sydney on The Daily Telegraph when someone associated with the Transport Workers' Union invited me to see a stage performance in Melbourne. This seemed rather odd at the time but we had a lovely business class flight down, all of which apparently came gratis from Qantas as they looked after the union bruvvas.
But the largesse spreads far wider than a few key unionists. Qantas has long been known for throwing free flights at travel hacks in return for gushing pieces and we also saw through the cash for comment saga that Qantas was happy to pay Alan Jones and John Laws with a combination of cash and free first class flights.
However, it is Federal politicians who are on the greatest Qantas free ride going around, most notably through their automatic membership of the Chairman's Lounge, which is worth thousands of dollars a year for each and every MP, plus their nominated partner. Ever wondered why you never bump into a politician in the Qantas Club? They're all over lapping it up in the Chairman's Lounge.
In any other corporate case, could you imagine an MP in receipt of thousands of dollars of contra being perceived to be, or actually being fair and balanced, in their policy deliberations? This Qantas largesse is the equivalent of Telstra paying all MPs' home phone bills or PBL annually giving $2,000 worth of free gaming chips to every federal MP.
It just shouldn't be happening so we're interested to find out more about this rort. Is it something that Qantas voluntarily dishes out as a strategy to keep sweet with the politicians when it comes to policy issues such as opening up the Pacific Route to more competition? Is it a bargaining chip they could dump at any time if regulation got a bit intense?
Is it a throwback to the days when Qantas was government owned? Or does the taxpayer shell out some whacking great sum each year for the privilege. If so, how much? Is it capped?
Unlike us ordinary folk who would have to pay fringe benefits tax on such a perk, the hypocritical federal pollies suffer no such ignominy for supping at the Qantas trough. So many questions, yet so few answers. Anyone who can shed some light on this or just wishes to let off some steam should email [email protected].
:ugh:
From Crikey.com.au
9. Time to shed light on Qantas's sweet deal for MPs
By Stephen Mayne, still yet to see a politician in the Qantas Club
The saga of Peter Costello's kids being upgraded to business class against their father's express directions for that flight home from LA in January raises plenty of questions about the culture within our national airline. We all know that airlines possess a commodity food, drink and comfortable travel away from the masses that is highly sought after so the big question is what they charge, or don't charge, for the service.
Back in December 1998, I was working in Sydney on The Daily Telegraph when someone associated with the Transport Workers' Union invited me to see a stage performance in Melbourne. This seemed rather odd at the time but we had a lovely business class flight down, all of which apparently came gratis from Qantas as they looked after the union bruvvas.
But the largesse spreads far wider than a few key unionists. Qantas has long been known for throwing free flights at travel hacks in return for gushing pieces and we also saw through the cash for comment saga that Qantas was happy to pay Alan Jones and John Laws with a combination of cash and free first class flights.
However, it is Federal politicians who are on the greatest Qantas free ride going around, most notably through their automatic membership of the Chairman's Lounge, which is worth thousands of dollars a year for each and every MP, plus their nominated partner. Ever wondered why you never bump into a politician in the Qantas Club? They're all over lapping it up in the Chairman's Lounge.
In any other corporate case, could you imagine an MP in receipt of thousands of dollars of contra being perceived to be, or actually being fair and balanced, in their policy deliberations? This Qantas largesse is the equivalent of Telstra paying all MPs' home phone bills or PBL annually giving $2,000 worth of free gaming chips to every federal MP.
It just shouldn't be happening so we're interested to find out more about this rort. Is it something that Qantas voluntarily dishes out as a strategy to keep sweet with the politicians when it comes to policy issues such as opening up the Pacific Route to more competition? Is it a bargaining chip they could dump at any time if regulation got a bit intense?
Is it a throwback to the days when Qantas was government owned? Or does the taxpayer shell out some whacking great sum each year for the privilege. If so, how much? Is it capped?
Unlike us ordinary folk who would have to pay fringe benefits tax on such a perk, the hypocritical federal pollies suffer no such ignominy for supping at the Qantas trough. So many questions, yet so few answers. Anyone who can shed some light on this or just wishes to let off some steam should email [email protected].
:ugh: