PDA

View Full Version : ATPL Maths requirements


captwannabe
4th Apr 2006, 18:49
Women = Time x Money

But, Time = Money

Therefore, Women = Money x Money
Women = (Money)squared

But, Money = root of all evil

So, (Money)squared = all evil

Therefore, Women = All Evil

:ok:

Now, isn't maths fun!

Whirlygig
4th Apr 2006, 18:58
The correct expression is Women=Time AND money.

The "AND" as an operand is the addition function, therefore

Women = time + money.

Following on from your argument that time=money

Women = money + money = 2xmoney

Money=root of all evil

Therefore, women=2xSQRT(All Evil)

NOT "All Evil" itself.

Love maths, me!

Cheers

Whirls

captwannabe
4th Apr 2006, 19:07
Yeah, go ahead and ruin the whole thing why don't ya! Destroy the joke Mr. Maths! What are ye like?

Chacha,
The joke just doesn't work the other way round. Sad, really.

:) (smug)

Chacha
4th Apr 2006, 19:09
Yeah, go ahead and ruin the whole thing why don't ya! Destroy the joke Mr. Maths! What are ye like?

Chacha,
The joke just doesn't work the other way round. Sad, really.

:) (smug)

certainly is! .. :E

captwannabe
4th Apr 2006, 19:13
Harsh.....:*

Chacha
4th Apr 2006, 19:16
Anymore? .. These are good jokes! .. Seriously .. :D

Whirlygig
4th Apr 2006, 19:16
Mr. Maths eh?

Cheers

Whirls

captwannabe
4th Apr 2006, 19:18
I have loads more jokes. But maybe I don't want to tell them to YOU! :rolleyes:

Chacha
4th Apr 2006, 19:20
No problem .. :ok:

captwannabe
4th Apr 2006, 19:29
Some of the worst comebacks ever! weak stuff :ok:

acbus1
5th Apr 2006, 07:50
The main problem is that women can't calculate the differential of money-in-the-bank and money-being-spent. :rolleyes:

Little Lady
5th Apr 2006, 07:58
OI, You, yes you, acbus1, have you just been seriously hurt by a female or do you generally have something against all us women?

Fair go, not all of us are money hungry, gold digging, materialistic b!tches.

Just to let you know...:ok:

BombayDuck
5th Apr 2006, 07:59
Whirls, I recommend Mister Maths as your next personal title :E

Devlin Carnet
5th Apr 2006, 08:09
Actually, I think you will find that The love of money is the root of all evil,
not money itself.
Now lets see yer equations work.

acbus1
5th Apr 2006, 09:33
Now you mention it, Little Lady.

Thigh length black leather stilletos pressed into my *****.

Multi element leather whip flailed across my ****.

Metal clamps...............Ohhhhhhh! Yesssssss.....mmmmmmmmetal clamppppppppsssss!

Ops Dude
5th Apr 2006, 10:02
Hey abacus is eveything well with your mind? You seem really bitter about quite a few things?

Would you like a hug?

Ops

Little Lady
5th Apr 2006, 10:06
acbus1, I'm going to assume Ops Dude is male... otherwise it would be ops Dudette!

Just so there's no confusion :ok: :p

Llademos
5th Apr 2006, 10:32
Whirlygig ....

If you are a statistician I believe AND is a multiplier

Ll

Whirlygig
5th Apr 2006, 10:38
No, I am not a statistician; I am/was a nuclear physicist! I was thinking of logic functions.

Devlin has it correct! I'm just trying to think about.

Women = 2xmoney.

Therefore, the love of money = love of women/2 (i.e. half a woman)

So, loving half a woman is the root of all evil.

Yeah, kinda makes sense?

Cheers

Whirls

acbus1
5th Apr 2006, 10:47
Nothing wrong with my mind, Ops Dudd! *twitch*.

Why do you ask? *gibber*.

Gotta go........that nasty nurse is coming.......*dribble* :\

chuks
5th Apr 2006, 11:54
The actual quote is, 'The love of money is the root of all evil.'

From my experience, though, the love of women must run it a close second. Who among us has not been led astray by the love of women? Many women included, I guess. (Wasn't it Greta Garbo who said, 'My mother warned me about men but she didn't warn me about women!')

Little Lady
5th Apr 2006, 12:14
It's not just men who get burned by women, men can be just as evil to women.

Quote by me earlier
Fair go, not all of us are money hungry, gold digging, materialistic b!tches.

Just to let you know...:ok:

Whirlygig
5th Apr 2006, 12:39
The actual quote is, 'The love of money is the root of all evil.'
Chuks,

Devlin already made that observation and I subsequently rehashed, sorry, reworked my theorem!

Cheers

Whirls