PDA

View Full Version : B.A. Bankruptcy advised


er340790
12th Jan 2006, 17:30
**Transport

The Times January 12, 2006
Actuary advises BA to go bankrupt
By Patrick Hosking and Angela Jameson

ONE of the City’s leading actuaries lobbed a bombshell into British Airways’ delicate negotiations over its £1.3 billion pension fund deficit by advising the airline to declare itself bankrupt.

Donald Duval, chief actuary at Aon Consulting, said filing for insolvency was the only option for BA if it wanted a permanent solution to its pension deficit.

In a written statement, Mr Duval said: “If Willie Walsh (BA’s new chief executive) is determined to relieve BA of its pension scheme deficit ‘once and for all’, without affecting the firm’s investment back into the business, then the only effective way open to him at present is bankruptcy.”

Delta Airlines and United Airlines in the US had already gone down that route, ridding themselves of pension liabilities by filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and it was “not inconceivable” that BA would consider the same course of action, he said.

BA denounced Mr Duval’s suggestion. “We don’t share Aon’s view and are committed to tackling the pension deficit with our staff,” it said. One source at the airline said the proposal was nonsense because BA was a million miles from insolvency and had cash at the half-year of £1.9 billion.

Last week Mr Walsh told the 35,000 members of the New Airways Pension Scheme that the deficit had to be addressed “once and for all”, so that the airline could achieve its target of 10 per cent operating margins. He made clear that he would not sacrifice investment in the business.

The scale of BA’s pension problems was underlined by a Times analysis, which showed that it was the most vulnerable blue chip with a deficit equivalent to 115.5p per share, more than one-third of its share price. Analysts predict that BA will put £500 million into the fund, with employees bearing the burden of £500 million more through higher contributions and reduced benefits.

Fifteen of the FTSE 100 companies have deficits representing 10 per cent or more of the share price. These include Rexam, Whitbread, ITV and J Sainsbury. The highest proportional deficits after BA are at BAE Systems, British Telecom and ICI.

apaddyinuk
12th Jan 2006, 17:36
Yes thats right....shut the airline down, hide away from the problem!!! Intelligent eh???
Scaremongering more than anything!!!

RRAAMJET
12th Jan 2006, 18:07
Clearly an actuary trying to make a name for himself with a bold quote, a la Warren Buffet's "....should have shot down the Wright Brothers over Kittyhawk..." famous jibe.

BA-BEANCOUNTER
12th Jan 2006, 18:24
According to their website
"Aon Consulting is committed to supporting multinational companies as they build strong, cohesive teams that transcend borders and span cultures"

when in fact they are recommending throwing in the towel, because an inteligent solution is just too much like hard work

Georgeablelovehowindia
12th Jan 2006, 18:25
He featured on 'Working Lunch' - BBC2 today. Didn't like the 'cut of his jib' at all. Neither did Mrs G, who has more than a passing interest in all this :sad:

Rainboe
12th Jan 2006, 18:36
The man is quite simply a fool out for headlines. Just imagine the world's most profitable airline putting itself into insolvency? The many shareholders who see a plainly very viable business taaking the Board to court for wiping out their investments will keep the Courts busy for decades! An outspoken, daft and irrelevant opinion, probably instigated by the Board in their battle against the staff!

Anti-ice
12th Jan 2006, 18:57
Donald Duval, chief actuary = reality check = zero credibilty....:rolleyes:

sammypilot
12th Jan 2006, 19:40
I'm not sure if Mr. Duval knows what he is talking about. There is no equivalent in the United Kingdom to Chapter 11 in the United States.

Strimmerdriver
12th Jan 2006, 20:15
Aon & Donald Duck are clearly one to avoid.

Shagtastic
12th Jan 2006, 21:45
You could always make the BA pilot recruitment department bankrupt before anything else! That would take care of a few issues... immagine the cost and time savings

Shags

Sunfish
12th Jan 2006, 21:49
The actuary is technically correct. Going bankrupt would make the pension deficit go away. Kind of like cutting off your head to save weight.

sixmilehighclub
12th Jan 2006, 21:52
So if you're ill, hold your breath for 30 minutes?
Cures all illnesses apparantly.

Dan Winterland
13th Jan 2006, 00:14
However, it seemed to work for Swissair. It is plausible that Swissair went under for just this reason. However, it would be hard for BA to claim it was bankrupt when it was making so much money.

daw
13th Jan 2006, 09:08
Yep he is technically correct. Of course in reality they would probably not head down this route for fear of the legal cases against the board of BA for running a company which is insolvent. Still its a nice threat to hold over peoples heads if they don't fall into line.

Daede1
13th Jan 2006, 09:22
quite an easy way out of it - put BA into a prepack administration deal, dump off the pension liability and recapitalise the company.
The other creditors dont lose out, but the pension fund evaporates, along with most of the staff goodwill.

UL975
13th Jan 2006, 09:51
Sounds like a good business solution to this difficult problem. It happened in Mexico, why not here? Perhaps they could not justify it at the moment but after a few pilot strikes I imagine it would be fairly easy to go bankrupt.

Dissolve BA, Pension Problems and Union Grip; start up the very next day free of all these burdens and ready to expand and compete on a level playing field.

As a new joiner if these crews had stood up for my pension, I may have considered standing up for them. As it stands it will defiantly be a NO to strike action. My number one interest is keeping BA Safe, Profitable and lots of Expansion. The more airframes we get the shorter the time to Command.

ffs
13th Jan 2006, 11:04
However, it seemed to work for Swissair. It is plausible that Swissair went under for just this reason. However, it would be hard for BA to claim it was bankrupt when it was making so much money.

Err, what exactly "worked" for Swissair? Sure they went bankrupt but Chapter 11 also doesn't exist in Switzerland which meant they stayed bankrupt. Also there was no pension fund deficit - the banktruptcy was caused by the failure of the Hunter Strategy. The pension fund was healthy at the time of the grounding. Quite the opposite of the BA situation.

N.B. Swiss International is not Swissair.

Swissair is no more, it has ceased to be.

L337
13th Jan 2006, 12:39
If BA declared itself bankrupt, then started up the next day, what would happen to the slots?
Without the slots BA is not an Airline.

L337

manintheback
13th Jan 2006, 13:41
Wouldnt be one of those same actuaries advising lots of big companies to take near permanent pension holidays (and return pensions 'excess' to themselves)back in the 80s and 90s cos the stock markets were going to return deliver double figure digit returns per chance?.
As someone well and truly shafted over this elsewhere good luck to those affected here.

Final 3 Greens
14th Jan 2006, 11:52
Donald Duval is not stupid neither does he have zero credibility as one poster says.

He may have zero credibility with the pilot community, but I doubt that would bother him, as he has plenty of credibility with the executive community, who pay his firm the money that keeps them in healthy business.

IcePack
14th Jan 2006, 14:19
After the Rolls Royce debacle in the 70's, wasn't there a law brought in to stop company's closing down & re-opening the next day under another name i.e. BA 2006 Ltd.
Any body know if the above is correct?
& if it is correct could they however open up in another EEC country. Um! in this case Eire comes to mind.

BikerMark
14th Jan 2006, 18:30
Going into bankruptcy would also most likely bring down the government's Pension Protection Fund, by unloading the BA shortfall onto it. While it might be a legal move, it would be highly unpopular with the other companies contributing to PPF, the government and the pensioners who are relying on the PPF.

MarkD
15th Jan 2006, 21:16
bikermark

you mean just as the US airlines have done to their federal protection funds?