PDA

View Full Version : SAA to stay in state hands.


skyvan
18th Nov 2005, 03:50
Nov 17 2005 09:20:58:473PM
By: Garth Theunissen



Johannesburg - Public Enterprises Minister Alec Erwin has hinted that national carrier South African Airways (SAA) would remain under state control even though it would shortly become a stand alone complex outside of the Transnet umbrella.
"The airline industry is very volatile and we (government) would want to retain majority ownership," he said on Thursday at a UCT Business School function in Johannesburg.

Erwin said that SA could not rely on foreign entities to oversee its air transport routes and that it would be better to keep SAA in state hands as the airline had a major role to play in growing the economy.

Erwin said: "We would rather not live with uncertainty so we won't be focusing on whether SAA is profitable or not."

Erwin also voiced similar thoughts on struggling state-owned defence contractor, Denel.

"We need a very stable shareholder in key infrastructure areas like defence," he said.

"If we stop Denel you can forget about having an aerospace industry in SA."

Erwin said that Denel was of key strategic importance to SA not only as a defence-manufacturing asset but also as an employer of highly skilled individuals.

"Denel employs a lot of scientists and if you cut it in half you will get a lot of scientists leaving the country," he said.

"We will be keeping the asset but will reposition it in much the same way that we've done in the motor manufacturing industry by try integrate the entity into the very complex global manufacturing system."

Edited by Adrienne Taylor


Cut from Fin24 page.

MysticFlyer
18th Nov 2005, 05:22
Alec Erwin - same initials as that other great thinker.

But then again, are we splitting atoms here?....engage them into FAIR competition. A lot of dead and rotting wood to be "pruned" away.

Reminds me of a that tongue twister....."how many wood can a woodchopper chop if a woodchopper would chop wood?"

:ooh:

now that you can put in your pipe and smoke it!

Banzai-blades
18th Nov 2005, 07:05
If he chops lighter coloured wood is much easier and goes quicker than the harder darker types of wood:E

Solid Rust Twotter
18th Nov 2005, 07:32
So, the taxpayer gets to remain on the hook for their incompetence and mismanagement....:rolleyes:

African Tech Rep
18th Nov 2005, 11:09
Erwin said: "We would rather not live with uncertainty so we won't be focusing on whether SAA is profitable or not."
Wish I could get a job where costs are unimportant:rolleyes:

spacedaddy
18th Nov 2005, 18:32
It's more than just that to compete with although it woul be enough. Now Bigwig at DOT now joins SAA ib a high position and maneuvering behind the scenes. Ought to be a law. Trouble is this one can't be brought to the competitions tribunal. Be proud of your company.

MysticFlyer
19th Nov 2005, 06:04
Some clarification: Replace "wood" in my posting as , "hout papvreeting gravytrainer koppe". Fair as in competition.

Now that's a tongue twister AND a conundrum!

Carry on....:uhoh:

Beta Light
20th Nov 2005, 10:32
Se hulle Mystic Flyer !! Feite my maat!

PAXboy
20th Nov 2005, 11:07
This announcement follows standard govt practice and I mean standard govt WORLDWIDE.

Countries used to want a big Navy but then aircraft were invented so they wanted a big Air Force (and some still do). This was reflected in the domestic transport. A large merchant navy fleet was considered 'good' and this was replaced by lots of aeroplanes with the country's name on the side. Because pride is involved the companies got fat. Very fat. Then they had to be propped up one, twice and again.

Eventually, they realise that the price of support is outweighed by the real price in money. They understand that having a 'flag carrier' is not, actually, vital to national pride. There are many reasons for this and they are not all financial, for the emblem of national pride continues to move. It moved from Navy to Merchant shipping and from Air Force to Passenger jets (preferably the newest and biggest!) and not it can move on and might something as simple as a football team.

So then the airlines can be part privatised and eventually sold off. Of course, some will go bust as their financial situation has just got too bad. If you look around the world you can see different airlines/countries in different stages. Olympic is near the end of the line, for example. SAA, on the other hand, has had the interesting experience of repeating the whole saga under new mgmt in the past 13 years and so they have further to go. If you look around the rest of Africa, you can see similar examples.

To sum up: This was predictable and the next ten years equally so!