PDA

View Full Version : False Alarm for Kulula Flight


Gunship
10th Aug 2005, 07:14
I would call it "Great work by a sharp crew" :ok:

Almost an hour after 150 passengers on a kulula.com flight left Johannesburg for Cape Town, they were told to put their head between their legs for an emergency landing in Johannesburg.

Ambulances and emergency staff were waiting on the runway and relieved passengers clapped their hands when flight MN101 eventually landed safely at Johannesburg International Airport at 07:15.

Kulula's MD-82 jet took off at 06:20. About 20 minutes later the captain announced a "flickering light", which could indicate a faulty engine, said Adele Engelbrecht-Botha, a passenger.

The pilot turned the aircraft around.

"At first we thought the captain just wanted to show us the beautiful sunrise," Engelbrecht-Botha said. :E (Ja well no fine) :E

"But then the crew showed us the procedure for an emergency landing, saying we must put our head between our legs when the plane landed. We were also prepared to leave the plane as quickly as possible as soon as we got the order to evacuate. It was quite traumatic."

Another passenger, Jurg Slabbert, said in the end the landing was "normal", but that ambulances escorted the plane.

Kulula's executive director, Gidon Novick, said on Tuesday the pilot had cut one of the engines as a precautionary measure and returned to Johannesbrug because of an oil pressure warning.

It was, however, a false alarm, and "nobody was in any danger".

Novick said there was "no merit" to allegations that older jets in the fleets of low-cost airlines, such as kulula, were unreliable.

"It all depends on how well an aircraft is being maintained. The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) services all our aircraft, as well as technicians of British Airways (BA), who owns a big share of our company."

The airline typically buys "young" used aircraft of about ten years old, while the average life span of a passenger jet was 30 years.

Gilbert Thwala, executive manager of incident investigations at the CAA, said there was "no indication" that low-cost airlines in South Africa were unreliable.

"There has been no increase in the number of emergency landings or flights experiencing problems during the past couple of years. We (the CAA) have more inspectors who are servicing the low-cost airlines' aircraft because an older generation of airplanes are being used."

Thwala said the "same standards" applied to all airlines in South Africa and the frequency of incidents, such as the one on Monday morning, was "stable".

http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/News/0,6119,2-7-1442_1751514,00.html

abc.fp
10th Aug 2005, 07:31
Sounds pretty routine to me... Can happen to any plane, old or new. The important thing is that the crew did the right thing, and just because emergency services were on standbye (which happens almost daily in FAJS) did the passengers rip things out of proportion again.

Interesting job isn't it...

Gunship
10th Aug 2005, 08:08
I once came in at Wonderboom (down hill runway 27/28 ?)

No brakes , no speed brakes ... no hydraulics ...

Landed very short, planted her and turned off at first turn off.

The Ruler of the country that I flew and his entourage clapped and joked while being towed in.

The ambassador called me aside and told me that there will be a board of inquiry into my "Violent turn off" as his security guard on board spilled some soft drink on his PEP stores broeks.

I walked to the the Ruler ... he quickly told the ambassador to wind his neck in. End of story .. never had a problem in 7 years ! :ok:

Headline news the next day back at home : " ..... Ruler in Death Defying Flight "

Journalists ... journalists ... :* :* :*

Well done Khulula .. :ok:

ByAirMail
10th Aug 2005, 08:23
"At first we thought the captain just wanted to show us the beautiful sunrise," Engelbrecht-Botha said.

What do you expect from someone that is not even sure who her Daddy is.

Exhaust Manifold
10th Aug 2005, 09:36
Old planes???:confused: Try flying a broken down 35 year old tomahawk everyday!!!! :}

Solid Rust Twotter
10th Aug 2005, 10:08
If they have the current crop of CAA inspectors doing the maintenance, I'm not surprised they had a problem.:E

Gunship
10th Aug 2005, 10:13
Solid Trusted Rusted Stirrer ... new name for you 'ol rusted one ..

:E :E :E

Solid Rust Twotter
10th Aug 2005, 10:18
Ek's verveeld, swaer.

Just giving the lure an occasional twitch to keep myself amused....:E

Gunship
10th Aug 2005, 10:31
Ek sien so ... I need someone for the pool and koi dam and the cars and the carpets where the doggies shat ... wanna job :E

Have u got CV's in again ?

Solid Rust Twotter
10th Aug 2005, 13:02
Always.......:ok:

Just waiting for first prize to kick in so I can quit hogging bandwidth with my CVs.

Gunship
10th Aug 2005, 17:12
Mhhh spend a bit of time at CT International this PM.

Kulula was on time (or very close).

My friend left on SAA to Jhb and he booked the kids and mum on cheap Kulula .. they had to leave at 1835 and he was due out at 1815.

Take a guess who was first in Jhb :O :O :O

When we left the airport the flight was till delayed ... :E

Goldfish Jack
11th Aug 2005, 05:47
Seems like the capt did the right thing - shows what quality training does for you. Believe that some of the old pensioners from SAA are trying to get instructor jobs at Comair and they can't believe what they see and how high the standard of training is at Comair.

I must admit I kinda get sick and tired of reading about these dangerous flights from the highly qualified aviation journalists.

I can always remember being told, at school, that if you can't find a job anywhere you can always join the local press and become a reporter. Have you ever seen a reporter that does not have long hair, is shaven, wears clean clothes and is presentable???

NO wonder they are highly qualified!

Right let me get back to updating my CV and I wonder which newspaper will interview me now

EladElap
11th Aug 2005, 12:15
I agree with guns!

Great workby the Kulula crew!!

It's a shame they are getting bad publicity from an incident like this, which to me actually shows how serious they are about safety. They would have lost thousands having to turn back and land, but never the less they decided to do so.

If they hadn't turned back, and continued onto FACT everyone would have been none the wiser. I just hope thist type ofpublicity doesn't result in the airline's placing pressure on the pilots to compromise marginal safety issues like this!!

Cheers

goatherd
12th Aug 2005, 12:04
Used to work for Comair, fantastic training and great training captains. Now work for big airline overseas and they can learn a lot from Comair, still the best airline in SA!!

Wish I was back there:{