PDA

View Full Version : AIA African International Airlines not so squeaky clean.


napoleon
3rd Jul 2005, 17:56
The following is an interesting admission by Stocks of a great wrong doing by his South African company.

British-based airline fuelled Congo terror

Jon Swain and Brian Johnson-Thomas, Times 3/7/05

REBEL groups terrorising civilians in eastern Congo, where a devastating war marked by widespread atrocities has killed nearly 4m people, are doing so with weapons and ammunition flown to Africa by a British-based airline.

United Nations officials believe the flights breach the UN ban on the shipment of arms that fuel conflict in the region.

African International Airways (AIA), whose offices in Crawley, West Sussex, are two miles from Gatwick airport, made a total of six flights from Tirana, Albania, to the Rwandan capital of Kigali in late 2002 and early 2003, carrying more than 250 tons of arms in DC8 freighter aircraft.

Documents seen by The Sunday Times show that the ultimate recipients of the cargo — more than 5m rounds of machinegun ammunition, pistol ammunition and rocket- propelled grenades — were Rwandan-backed rebel groups based over the border in conflict-ridden eastern Congo. The rebels have killed, tortured and raped and have plundered Congo’s rich natural resources.

Last week Chris Patten, the former European commissioner for external relations, called the war in Congo “probably the most deadly conflict on earth since world war two”.

AIA, which has British directors, is a South African-registered company whose DC8s are on the civil aviation register of Swaziland.

The convoluted trail of the supplies is typical of the murky end of the international arms trade to Africa, experts say. The Albanian surplus ammunition was sold by a private company called Meico — the Military Export Import Company — that works on commission from Albania’s defence ministry.

Meico sold the ammunition to an Israeli company which then approached a firm in Tel Aviv to arrange transport to central Africa. This then contacted an air cargo broker which hired AIA to carry the ammunition. The cargo was consigned to yet another firm, registered in the British Virgin Islands. Paperwork for four of the six flights shows Kigali as the transit point for notional final destinations in Congo, Burundi, Brunei and the British Virgin Islands.

Last week Alan Stocks, managing director of AIA, said that he was not aware that the flights to Rwanda broke UN sanctions: “I suppose that we were naive, but we thought that the flights were normal government-to-government ones.”

At least one member of the crew expressed concern about the legitimacy of the flights, however. The DC8s were loaded and unloaded amid strict security in military areas of Tirana and Kigali airports. At Kigali they were met by an Israeli who restricted the crew’s movements on the ground.

The Foreign Office said: “We raised this issue with the governments of Albania and Rwanda with the intention of stopping any activity that may breach United Nations sanctions.

“We received assurances that Albania had sold these goods in the belief that it was a legitimate government-to- government deal.”

The Foreign Office also asked Customs and Excise to investigate the role of AIA. Yesterday a customs spokesman said there was “insufficient evidence to justify any further inquiries as no UK criminal offences have been committed”. During the investigation AIA continued to fly for the Ministry of Defence from RAF Lyneham to Basra, Iraq.

Brian Wood, Amnesty International’s research manager on the arms and security trade, said: “The British government says its laws are designed to protect human rights worldwide. That is why we need to have a full and prompt inquiry to uncover the truth about these flights.”

The flights from Albania are far from being the only recent arms shipments to the war-torn Great Lakes region of Africa bordering Congo and Rwanda.

In a report to be published on Tuesday, Amnesty details a further 150 tons of ammunition sent via Rwanda from Serbia; arms-for-diamonds agreements involving the Congolese government and companies in the Czech Republic, Israel and Ukraine; and evidence that Uganda supplied arms, ammunition and military support to armed opposition groups in eastern Congo last year, especially to groups controlling gold mining areas and trade routes.

The desire to control mining concessions by the use of proxy forces also appears to motivate the Rwandan government.

Days after an AIA flight from Tirana to Kigali, an Antonov 32B aircraft left Kigali for Bunia in Congo’s Ituri province. Departing on January 1, 2003 the aircraft carried “several tons of ammunition” and Thomas Lubanga, president of the Union des Patriotes Congolais (UPC), a local Ituri militia, and members of his party.

Shortly after the plane departed, the UPC established a “government” that purported to control Bunia and the rest of Ituri. Rafiki Saba Amiable, a Rwandan, was made chief of security services. He was also on the arms flight.

A confidential report to the UN security council, which The Sunday Times has seen, claimed that the UPC army commander reported directly to the Rwandan army’s chief of staff.

In October 2002, a UN report said that Congo’s “contribution to Rwanda’s military expenses would therefore have been in the order of $320m. The activities funded by [these] resources strongly shape Rwanda’s foreign policy . . . These transactions are, however, hidden from the scrutiny of international organisations”.

montys ex teaboy
3rd Jul 2005, 21:43
Yes, interesting post.

Can you tell me any freight outfit, that hasn't carried arms.

napoleon
4th Jul 2005, 06:00
Hey!! what are you guys smoking out there?
These people flew arms to a country that was/is supporting rebels in the DRC where South Africa has peace keeping troops............
Stocks has breached the South African FMA act which makes it illegal for any South African to render military assistance to any foreign power.
Plus as far as I know the Swazi /RSA ANR's dont allow any carrier to carry weapons of war.
The mans a jerk and a criminal and should be nailed to the full extent of the law..........the DPPA should do their job.

I.R.PIRATE
4th Jul 2005, 11:20
All good and well...however, Sir Bob Geldoff and his Live 8 farce, are in effect doing exactly the same. Only they are not supplying the weapons themselves, but the means to aquire them. Do not for one second be blinded by all the ads of poor starving children, and fall for the doe eyed singers and actresses lamenting the fate of the poor poor africans. Any money pumped into africa, is purely a means for the leader**** to aquire more power over their minions, and pad their wallets to MAUW. The countries are in the state they find themselves due to their leaders, and the constant power squablling that will never, never end. And as much as I would like to say, a la George Dubya, lets change the regime, that will not work in Africa, because the next idiot that is put into power, will be just another half mad despot dictator, who only wants to be the RICHEST most POWERFUL , flying the BIGGEST BIGGEST JET.....Africa is a lost cause, History will always repeat itsself.

Target aquired, permission to engage....

Engineer
4th Jul 2005, 11:55
Yawn Yawn :( another person jumping on the I hate live 8 band wagon.

Cynicism will all ways hold progress back and is it not clear the nature of the concert was not to raise money but awareness. So since no money was raised how canthey are not supplying the weapons themselves, but the means to aquire them weapons be acquired ?

Getting back to the thread companies that transport arms have done and will all ways do so. For that to change then the operators will need to adopt a social conscience. But unfortunately greed and financial gain will take precedence over the majority of peoples' social conscience

dionysius
5th Jul 2005, 08:14
"The Foreign Office said: “We raised this issue with the governments of Albania and Rwanda with the intention of stopping any activity that may breach United Nations sanctions.

“We received assurances that Albania had sold these goods in the belief that it was a legitimate government-to- government deal.”

The Foreign Office also asked Customs and Excise to investigate the role of AIA. Yesterday a customs spokesman said there was “insufficient evidence to justify any further inquiries as no UK criminal offences have been committed”. During the investigation AIA continued to fly for the Ministry of Defence from RAF Lyneham to Basra, Iraq. "


The whole incident was investigated and the company cleared, this is just an article by a freelance journo that has been floating around for a few months waiting on some paper with lack of news to use it .

napoleon
5th Jul 2005, 11:12
The whole incident was investigated and the company cleared, this is just an article by a freelance journo that has been floating around for a few months waiting on some paper with lack of news to use it .
I do not believe that Criminal Intel Service in South Africa will share the above view, Stocks is a criminal and a fool if he thinks he will get away with this......... WATCH THIS SPACE!!!!!!!!!