212man
13th Feb 2005, 14:42
This may not be the right forum but as many here will be directly inolved in aircraft certification I thought I'd try.
I recently read the Portuguese accident investigation report on the Transat A330 that ran out of fuel and landed at the Azores. What struck me the most was how on earth it is/was possible to certify an aircraft with back up systems that resulted in there being no FDR or CVR? If a large airliner is flying with its sole power being the battery and RAT it must be, by definition, in a very precarious position and chances are that, even if a safe outcome results, an AAIB investigation will be needed. A CVR and FDR would seem a pre-requisite in this case!
I would aslo have thought losing the DME wasn't too clever either; it can't be that power hungry, surely?
Reminds me of the acceptance flight, of a new helicopter, I made a few years ago when on shutdown we found there was a HUMS failure. Further investigation showed that the manufacturer had powered the HUMS DTU though the shed bus!
I recently read the Portuguese accident investigation report on the Transat A330 that ran out of fuel and landed at the Azores. What struck me the most was how on earth it is/was possible to certify an aircraft with back up systems that resulted in there being no FDR or CVR? If a large airliner is flying with its sole power being the battery and RAT it must be, by definition, in a very precarious position and chances are that, even if a safe outcome results, an AAIB investigation will be needed. A CVR and FDR would seem a pre-requisite in this case!
I would aslo have thought losing the DME wasn't too clever either; it can't be that power hungry, surely?
Reminds me of the acceptance flight, of a new helicopter, I made a few years ago when on shutdown we found there was a HUMS failure. Further investigation showed that the manufacturer had powered the HUMS DTU though the shed bus!