PDA

View Full Version : 7E7 becomes 787, Chinese order 60


Wirraway
29th Jan 2005, 02:50
Friday, January 28, 2005

Boeing lands key order for 787s from Chinese
By JAMES WALLACE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER AEROSPACE REPORTER

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/photorelease/q1/050128h.jpg

After months of negotiations, delays and political intrigue, The Boeing Co. will finally get its long-awaited order today from Chinese airlines for 60 787 jetliners.

That's right: 787s.

Boeing will announce not only its biggest 7E7 order to date, but that it will give the plane the next name in its 7-series of jets, which began with the 707, according to people familiar with the deal.

After a contract is signed, the deal would be worth about $7.2 billion at the jet's $120 million list price. The six Chinese airlines ordering the 7E7 are likely getting significant discounts.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer first reported last month that in keeping with tradition, Boeing had decided to rename its new jet the 787 but was holding off on any announcement until it landed the China order.

The number 8 is considered lucky in China.

Boeing would not confirm how many 7E7s the six Chinese airlines will order, but sources have told the paper for months that the number would be about 60. A person with knowledge of the order confirmed that number again yesterday.

A ceremony to sign a preliminary agreement for the planes will be held at the Commerce Department in Washington, D.C.

Chinese officials, including the Chinese ambassador to the United States, will attend, along with Boeing Commercial Airplanes boss Alan Mulally.

More negotiations will be needed before a contract is signed, according to a person familiar with the accord that has been struck.

The Boeing-China event will take place only a few hours after an aircraft-signing ceremony across the Atlantic, where French and Airbus officials will meet today in Paris with a Chinese delegation to sign an agreement for five A380 superjumbo jets. The 555-seat planes are being ordered by China Southern, one of the six airlines that are ordering the 7E7.

It is the first order from China for the Airbus plane, which will replace Boeing's 747 as the world's biggest passenger jetliner.

The other Chinese airlines ordering the 7E7 are China Eastern, Air China, Shanghai Airlines, Hainan Airlines and Xiamen Airlines.

They will take a mix of the short-range 7E7-3s and longer range 7E7-8s, according to people familiar with the deal.

The models have the same size fuselage and can carry nearly 300 passengers in a two-class cabin configuration. The twin-engine 7E7 is bigger than Boeing's 767, which it replaces, but smaller than the 777.

China is a key battleground for Boeing and Airbus. Both airplane makers are providing more jetliner manufacturing work for Chinese companies as they seek to tap into the world's fastest-growing aviation market.

China's Chengdu Aircraft will supply the 7E7 rudder, a key part of the plane's vertical fin.

Boeing has awarded several other Chinese companies smaller amounts of work for the 7E7.

Last year, Boeing selected China's Xian Aircraft to supply floor beams for an important program to convert 747-400 passenger jets into freighters.

China’s Xian Aircraft Industry Co. builds vertical fins for Boeing’s 737 jetliners. Shanghai Aircraft Corp., also a Chinese company, builds horizontal stabilizers for the 737. (Editor's Note: The original version of this story misidentified the manufacturers of those parts.)

Some of these Chinese companies also make parts for Airbus jets. Airbus recently said it hoped to reach an agreement for Chinese companies to take a 5 percent equity stake in its A350 jetliner program.

The A350 will be the Airbus counter to the 7E7. It would be a derivative of the twin-engine A330, not an all-new jet like the 7E7.

Both the A380 and 7E7 could be used by Chinese airlines to carry passengers to the 2008 Olympic Games, which will be held in Beijing in August 2008.

The A380 will enter service with airlines next year. Boeing will start delivering the 7E7 to customers in the first half of 2008.

The China 7E7 order represents an industry milestone. For the first time, Chinese airlines will be the launch customers for a Western-built jet.

Industry observers say this is a significant opportunity for China to showcase its growing power, and place, in such an important industry as it gets ready to host the Olympics.

Boeing had been hoping to land the China order last year and had factored in those 60 planes as part of its internal expectations -- and public forecast -- that it would have about 200 7E7 orders by the end of 2004.

Instead, it ended the year with 126 firm orders and commitments.

Ordering new jets is a complicated process in China in which the government gets involved after its airlines have reached preliminary agreements with the airplane makers.

In the past, politics has resulted in delays in some Boeing airplane orders from China.

There had been speculation that politics again were to blame for the long delay in the Chinese 7E7 order.

But a person close to the situation said the delay was more the result of China wanting a better deal with Boeing.

China knew how important its order was for Boeing's 7E7 program, and it used that as leverage in the negotiations, according to this person.

But it is also probably no coincidence that the Chinese are signing deals with Boeing and Airbus on the same day.

Until now, Boeing's biggest 7E7 order was from the first customer, All Nippon Airways of Japan, for 50 planes.

Following today's signing ceremony at the Commerce Department, Mike Bair, vice president of the 7E7 program, will hold a teleconference with reporters, during which he is expected to explain why Boeing will change the plane's name to the 787.

Boeing's last new jet was the 777, which followed the 767, 757, 747, 737, 727 and 707.

It is not unusual early in a Boeing aircraft development program for the name of a proposed new jet to have a letter sandwiched between 7s.

With the 7E7, however, Boeing waited until well into the program to change the name.

Company executives wanted to carefully weigh the name change, given the successful worldwide marketing and branding associated with the 7E7 name.

But tradition -- and the prospect of making a good impression with China -- carried the day. In Mandarin, the main language of China, as well as in Cantonese, the pronunciation of "eight" sounds the same as "to make money."

In China, people pay money for license plates or phone numbers that end with the number 8. Weddings are planned around dates that include the number.

The Beijing Olympics will begin at 8 p.m. on 8/8/08.

Boeing is showing just how much it values China as a customer and partner by having the name change coincide with the announcement that Chinese airlines will order 60 jets.

China will get a double-dose of good luck with the Boeing jet. The 7E7-8 will now become the 787-8.

===========================================

Eastwest Loco
29th Jan 2005, 06:05
It doesn't matter what equipment they fly, with the stark exception of CX, Chinese airlies are complete bastards to deal with. Dragonair is just as bad.

Failed prepaids, cancellations for no reason other than they didn't like the look of the booking and a miriad of other potential disasters that haunt us until the psgr has actually got there and back.

Recently I had a psgr on China Southern in J class. It was fine on the way out, but on the way back they slammed another 2 rows into J as they were overbooked. Less legroom than Y. SOP I believe.

The 7E7/787 is a fine looking aeroplane, but a shame to see it operated by a second rate group of companies.

Best all.

EWL

Kaptin M
29th Jan 2005, 06:33
they slammed another 2 rows into J as they were overbooked. Less legroom than Y. The legroom wouldn't bother the Chinese traveller, EWL. The REASON they - like many other Asians - select a class higher than EY, is because of status....which is probably why copy Rolexes are produced there (I see you can pick them up at the Carrara Markets, on the Gold Coast now, along with the fake LV bags, and fake designer sunnies!!).
However, you'll never find a wealthy Asian wearing a fake copy watch - but he would rather travel in a J Class seat with less legroom, than an EY seat, even if the seat itself is no different.
Different cultures, different interpretations and expectations.

BankAngle50
29th Jan 2005, 06:35
East West think you should rethink your statements. This is a great bussiness coup for Boeing. The rate at which people of certain ethnicities crash and damage aircraft will keep Boeing in constant orders for hauls and spares for years to come. Time to buy USBA stock. Just need Korean to come on board now.:ok:
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/photorelease/q1/050128g.jpg

Kornholio
29th Jan 2005, 10:43
This has already been reported here in R&N (http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=161167)where it belongs or in the other asian forums. Australia is not part of Asia. Last time I checked.......

Come on old fella..... you're scratching around now.

http://www.smilies.our-local.co.uk/index_files/angryoldman.gif


Having said that, I will try to spin an Aussie angle on this wayward news-tidbit. For many Aussie pilots, Asia will soon become "our only hope"....... the (1 BILLION+) Chinamen are gonna need a lot of jet mota-plenns from now on especially bearing in mind their "skills" with machinery.

And since it isn't exactly the French riviera lifestyle..... the cash should be good for a while to come.

I guess we'll see an ex-JetScar club up there soon.

:ok:

;)

:)

:D

:ooh:

:suspect:

:bored:

:hmm:

:zzz:

Kaptin M
29th Jan 2005, 11:08
Getting bored again, Korney?? :hmm:

At least Wirraway gave us the full article, and with some u-beaut photos too!

And you're right, China is set to become a MAJOR employer of non-Chinese pilots - Dixon might want to do a swap with some QF pilots for Chinese F/A's..like 5:1. ;)
The $$'s paid there now aren't too bad - and are only going to have to improve, to attract pilots.
But as you say, it ain't the French Riviera (or Brisbane!).

Eastwest Loco
29th Jan 2005, 12:42
I agree Bank, it is a brilliant "hard ball get" and good on them.

I must admit I am a bit of a Boeingophile, but loved the A330-300 and 200 series on a recent trip. Problem with Airbus is that they are more prone to structural cracks from what I have read. Long term only, and let's face it - old airliners do only cut it in certain markets these days.

Fact is that Chinese airlines are an atrocity to deal with. Offloads even with ticket numbers advised are normal. Communication is shoddy, and if you prepay a ticket to a city office within China you can guarantee they will say it is wrong and demand an extra USD100.00 or more before they punch the ticket out.

Cathay are fine, but Dragonair are atrocious.

I do prefer 787 though - it is nice to see the genre continued. So far the 707 is the only beastie I havent passengered on, and do not like my chanches.

best all

EWL

Massey1Bravo
30th Jan 2005, 02:59
East West think you should rethink your statements. This is a great bussiness coup for Boeing. The rate at which people of certain ethnicities crash and damage aircraft will keep Boeing in constant orders for hauls and spares for years to come. Time to buy USBA stock. Just need Korean to come on board now.

The West German Luftwaffe famously crashed 269 F-104G Starfighters, a 34% loss rate, while the Canadian Air force crashed 110 CF-104s, about 50 percent of their entire fleet. :eek:

Perhaps this is why Lockheed is still in business....:E

Zapatas Blood
30th Jan 2005, 03:21
"Chinamen are gonna need a lot of jet mota-plenns from now on especially bearing in mind their "skills" with machinery."

Could you clarify what exactly you are getting at. Are you suggesting that Chinese pilots lack the skills of western pilots?

Perhaps you would like to compare safety records of Air China and USAir. Or maybe China Eastern with Valuejet.

BankAngle50
30th Jan 2005, 03:54
ZAP Happy to clarify for you. Chinese are f*cking hopeless aviators. They crash more than anyone else, just look at the ICAO crash stats. Anyway you must B last man on the team, not to be aware of what everyone else knows. Maybe this is why the HKG Chinese are proud that they have their “round eyes” up the front. Korean put 5 jumbos in (CFIT) in 2 years! You would almost have to be trying! Perhaps this is why there insurer’s demanded a % of Western pilots. You could set your watch with China Airlines—one Airbus a year!

February 16, 1998
Taipei, Taiwan
China Airlines, Flight 676
Airbus A300-622R
B-1814

The aircraft was attempting to land at Taipei's international airport in rain and fog when the crew requested a go-around. The plane crashed into a residential neighborhood, ripping the roofs off several structures, skidding into a rice paddy and bursting in flames. DFDR data showed complete autopilot disengagement just after landing clearance. This was followed by an attempted manually flown go-around with falling airspeed and a pitch-up of 40 degrees followed by a gain of 1,000 feet in altitude, total stall and a dive resulting in impact with the ground. All 196 aboard killed

August 6, 1997
Agana, Guam
Korean Airlines, Flight 801
Boeing B-747-300
HL-7468
The aircraft crashed into Nimitz Hill, 3 miles short of Runway 06R, while making a non-precision approach in heavy rain to A.B. Won Guam International Airport. The runway glide slope system was inoperative. There was confusion why there was no glideslope indication, although this was NOTAM'ed out of service. In addition, the Minimum Safe Altitude Warning system (MSAW) was also not working due to a software problem. Two hundred twenty-nine of 254 aboard killed.

April 26, 1994
Near Komaki, Aichi, Japan
China Airlines, Flight 140
Airbus A300B4-622R
B-1816

While on ILS approach to Nagoya Airport, at an altitude of 1,000 feet, the first officer inadvertently triggered the TOGA (take-off-go-around) lever. The crew tried to override this situation by turning off the autothrottle and reducing air speed. The aircraft stalled, hit the runway tail first and burst into flames. The plane crashed because of an extreme out of trim configuration brought about by the fact that the tailplane setting had moved automatically and undetected to a maximum nose-up position. The plane climbed at a steep angle until it stalled. The crew could have saved the aircraft even in the final seconds had they reverted to basic flight procedures and switched off the autopilot. Two-hundred-sixty-four out of 271 aboard were killed.

oicur12
1st Feb 2005, 07:51
Bank angle,

You first mention Chinese pilots and then you move on to quote accident's suffered by Korean Airlines and China Airlines. Why. You then offer some information regarding the requirements of Insurance companies - "Perhaps this is why there insurer’s demanded a % of Western pilots". No, some insurance companies placed requirements on KAL such as being trained and experienced in western airline operations. This is not the same as being "Western".

The accident rate in China is higher than the US, Europe and Australia but not dissimilar to Africa or Central / South America. The statistics indicate that there are systemic problems plaguing the airline industry in these regions. Maintenance, ATC, weather, terrain, congestion, language, operational support, operational maturity, training, old aircraft - all these factors contribute to the safety levels experienced by different airlines operating in different regions.

I agree that China, as a result of all of the factors listed above, has a poor safety record indeed. However, to simply dismiss such a record with comments such as "Chinese are f*cking hopeless aviators" is to show a total lack of understanding of the problems facing countries such as China as they develop technologically, industrially and commercially much quicker than most western nations ever have.

Most Chinese airlines were still operating first generation jet aircraft to poorly equipped airports with inexperienced crew when their western counterparts were operating the finest IRS/GPWS/TCAS/WX Radar equipped aircraft money could buy. With this in mind, it would be more appropriate to compare the Chinese airline industry to an era when airlines in the US suffered 15 fatal 727 accidents in less than 20 years.

Say what you want about Chinese pilots. They are generally inexperienced, often poorly trained and until recently were operating old aircraft around a country devoid of accurate navigation aids. But to suggest that they are hopeless aviators simply because they were born in China (or more importantly I suspect your bone of contention is that they were not born with round eyes) is to pick an argument with Darwin that you could not win in a month of sundays.

Ultralights
1st Feb 2005, 08:20
i wonder if the chinese/korean markets will be the first to trial the "pilotless aircraft" in the future??


would save a few lives!


even i remember as a kid in the 80's hearing all the chinese aviation jokes, even bought a T-shirt in Honk Kong with the CAAC logo on it, and the english translation underneath " China airlines alway crash!"

Zapatas Blood
1st Feb 2005, 08:46
CAAC were still operating aircraft like Trident, AN24 and Ilyushin as late as the nineties.

China NW was operating TU154's until recently. Shanghai airlines operated 707's until 1988 and Sichuan Airlines the TU154 until 1996. China has crap weather, BIG mountains, poor ATC and has experienced HUGE expansion. Australians should avoid pointing fingures.

Lets compare apples with apples. Shouldn't these accident rates be compared to western airlines in the sixties and seventies.

Ultralights
1st Feb 2005, 08:59
lets just hope chine puts the resources required into upgrading their ATC and NAV systems to match the US and EU! they have the manpower and the money, but will pressure from the west, Boeing and Airbus make the government do what is needed? especially in the face or a rapidly expanding industry in china?

vneandbeyond
2nd Feb 2005, 02:43
What about India, surely this place is an even bigger sleeping giant?