74Freight
30th Nov 2004, 17:10
How useful is experience on an "older" turboprop (eg HS748, Shorts360, F27) towards getting a jet job?
I have seen quite a few lads come to us over the years with about 1000 hours instructing and after a year or two manually flying approaches to minima in bad weather after being up all night, go on to a jet job.
This seems to have slowed a lot recently, is this perhaps because
a) the chance of loosing all the automatics on eg an A320 is so remote as to make this experience irrelevant, or
b) so many low hours pilots, instead of following this route are paying for ratings plus time on type and are therefore more attractive to jet operators.
It is good to see companies like Thompsonfly and Flybe sponsoring cadets again but a lot of our chaps have applied to these and similar airlines and not even been called for assesment, they seem to prefer those straight out of training.
Any opinions?
I have seen quite a few lads come to us over the years with about 1000 hours instructing and after a year or two manually flying approaches to minima in bad weather after being up all night, go on to a jet job.
This seems to have slowed a lot recently, is this perhaps because
a) the chance of loosing all the automatics on eg an A320 is so remote as to make this experience irrelevant, or
b) so many low hours pilots, instead of following this route are paying for ratings plus time on type and are therefore more attractive to jet operators.
It is good to see companies like Thompsonfly and Flybe sponsoring cadets again but a lot of our chaps have applied to these and similar airlines and not even been called for assesment, they seem to prefer those straight out of training.
Any opinions?