Head Turner
20th Oct 2004, 12:11
In the Feedback section of Rotor and Wing October issue, Shawn Coyle's letter refers to piston vs turbine power.
Looking at two Flight Manuals one for the MD600 and the other the Agusta A119 the maximum weight to enable a 3-3.5 skid height AGL hover at Take Off Power is achieved using differing data.
The MD600 uses Hp and OAT to give Hd which is then used against OAT to give the maximum weight to achieve the Hovering Ceiling.
The Agusta A119 uses Hp and OAT alone.
Why the differences for the same situation?
The last paragraph of the letter also requires further explanation I quote.
The power required to hover (at the same weight and hover height above the ground) for both types is a function of density altitude. But the other half of the equation, the power available for the turbine machine, is not a function of density altitude
Looking at two Flight Manuals one for the MD600 and the other the Agusta A119 the maximum weight to enable a 3-3.5 skid height AGL hover at Take Off Power is achieved using differing data.
The MD600 uses Hp and OAT to give Hd which is then used against OAT to give the maximum weight to achieve the Hovering Ceiling.
The Agusta A119 uses Hp and OAT alone.
Why the differences for the same situation?
The last paragraph of the letter also requires further explanation I quote.
The power required to hover (at the same weight and hover height above the ground) for both types is a function of density altitude. But the other half of the equation, the power available for the turbine machine, is not a function of density altitude