PDA

View Full Version : F35B goes on a diet


Navaleye
15th Sep 2004, 15:24
FORT WORTH, Texas --- Engineers have removed more than 2,700 pounds (1,225 kilograms) of unwanted estimated weight from the short-takeoff/vertical-landing (STOVL) version of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, while increasing propulsion efficiency and reducing drag. The result is an F-35 JSF design recommendation that is expected to meet or exceed all of its performance requirements.

"The F-35 is now tracking ahead of its Key Performance Parameters, and past concerns about the aircraft's aerodynamic performance have diminished," said Tom Burbage, Lockheed Martin executive vice president and general manager of F-35 JSF program integration. "Because of the design similarities among the three F-35 variants, many of the STOVL-version refinements will translate to the conventional and carrier versions, which already met their performance requirements even before the STOVL improvements were instituted."

The F-35 team anticipates final approval of the STOVL revisions when the U.S. Defense Acquisition Board meets on Oct. 14.

"We have addressed every known aspect affecting STOVL aerodynamic performance and shipboard compatibility," said Rear Adm. Steven Enewold, F-35 JSF program executive director. "We feel our proposed configuration is operationally viable. The next step is to get the trade-study results implemented into the detailed STOVL design package."

With first flight expected in August 2006, production becomes the program's central focus. All four of the first test aircraft's major subassemblies are now in work. Last month BAE Systems began assembling the aft fuselage and tails in Samlesbury, England, and Lockheed Martin started wing assembly at the company's Fort Worth plant. In May, Northrop Grumman kicked off F-35 assembly when it began making the center fuselage in Palmdale, Calif. Forward-fuselage assembly started the following month in Fort Worth. Production of control surfaces and edges will soon be under way at Lockheed Martin's Palmdale site.

Final assembly of the F-35 is planned to start next spring in Fort Worth, with completion of the first aircraft anticipated in late 2005.

The program already is preparing for the challenge of operating, supporting and sustaining thousands of F-35s worldwide. Nine countries currently are engaged in the aircraft's development and are expected to begin adding F-35s to their fleets early in the next decade. Many other nations have expressed interest in the aircraft, and the roster of international F-35 customers is likely to grow. The task of sustaining such a large number of aircraft over a geographically dispersed area for more than 40 years will be made possible by the F-35's exceptional reliability, its next-generation onboard diagnostics, its standardized and simplified maintenance processes, streamlined supply-chain management and many other advances over current fighters.

The F-35 is a next-generation, supersonic, multi-role stealth aircraft designed to replace the AV-8B Harrier, A-10, F-16, F/A-18 Hornet and the United Kingdom's Harrier GR.7 and Sea Harrier.

Lockheed Martin and its principal industrial partners Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems are employing an array of advanced and highly accurate manufacturing machines to help the F-35 achieve its goals of affordability, quality and assembly speed.

Three F-35 variants -- a conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL), a short- takeoff/vertical-landing (STOVL) and a carrier variant (CV) -- each derived from a common design will ensure that the F-35 meets the performance needs of the U.S. Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy, the U.K. Royal Air Force and Royal Navy, and allied defense forces worldwide, while staying within strict affordability targets.

Lockheed Martin is developing the F-35 in conjunction with Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. Companies worldwide are participating in the F-35's development. Two propulsion teams, led by Pratt & Whitney and General Electric, are developing separate interchangeable engines for the F-35.

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., a business area of Lockheed Martin, is a leader in the design, research and development, systems integration, production and support of advanced military aircraft and related technologies. Its customers include the military services of the United States and allied countries throughout the world.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin employs about 130,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture and integration of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2003 sales of $31.8 billion.

Jackonicko
15th Sep 2004, 15:50
How many 900-kg (2,000-lb) class weapons will it carry internally?

You know, the classic 'first day of the war' penetrators, or standard Paveway IIIs. Or any future weapons sized to be a similar fit.......

pr00ne
15th Sep 2004, 16:21
Jackonicko,

Original was to be able to accomodate 2 x 1,000lb JDAM's and 2 x AMRAAM, was then decided to makethe bay larger so it was common to the other models of the F-35, then weight shaving took it back to the smaller weapons bay.

So,

2 JDAM
2 AMRAAM

internally.

TC27
15th Sep 2004, 16:49
I dont think its big enough to carry the GPS PAVEWAY bombs the RAF uses internally, maybe the MOD will accuire JDAMs or those new fangled small diameter bombs the yanks are working on.

DuckDodgers
15th Sep 2004, 18:14
I think Paveway IV will fit in there nicely somewhow, good effort to the boys and girls at Fort Worth, just hope i am still around to play with it!

Bigger bomb is not necessarily better it's the Kinematics that count!

Jackonicko
15th Sep 2004, 18:45
"Bigger bomb is not necessarily better."

True. Quite true.

But flexibility and choice IS always better than the reverse.

Navaleye
15th Sep 2004, 18:48
If the USAF wants hundreds of them as does the USMC, you can bet your shiny boots it well up to our specs. Good news for CVF, makes the loss of the Shar slightly less painful.

Pontius Navigator
15th Sep 2004, 18:50
We have a smaller bomb!

jindabyne
15th Sep 2004, 21:06
Agree with the smaller versus bigger bomb bit, but a viable multi-role platform (2 AMRAAM!) it is not. Is it able to carry kit externally? If so fine, but its stealth properties then go out the window. In which case, Typhoon (in its full spec version) seems a far better choice for those wanting cost-effective flexibility.

Gazman
15th Sep 2004, 23:11
It will probably only require 'stealth' capabilities for the first few days of any offensive. After that pylons will be attached and the aircraft will turn into a bomb truck, unless your trying to take off vertical.
What the UK needs is internal Meteor integration, I doubt the yanks are too keen on that idea though coz it may affect future AMRAAM sales.

Navaleye
16th Sep 2004, 16:16
I don't think the F35B is designed for vertical take-off. Its a short take off only plane. The internal carriage of 2 AMRAAMs is for self defense on strike missions. I believe it can 6 AMRAAMS externally. BTW the new AIM120D is a far better weapon than the current C model.

AMRAAM-D will incorporate a two-way datalink, as well as GPS guidance for the missile’s navigation, This will make the missile more accurate. The new datalink will enable the missile to report its status once launched and will likely report back some sort of summary data from its’ onboard radar, such as distance from target once it has locked on. It will allow the missile to engage in attacks at targets to the side or rear of the aircraft., outside of a fighter’s normal front-directional radar coverage. A fighter armed with the AMRAAM-D could launch on targets that are behind it – such as an enemy fighter trying to line up for a tail shot. The two-way datalink would also be used to improve such tactics as launching the missile at a distant target identified by an AWACS radar plane, using the missile’s own onboard radar to lock onto targets. A two-way data link would give fighters the option to use the AMRAAM’s radar data to update their own tactical displays.