PDA

View Full Version : Qantas ignores union threats


Wirraway
30th Jul 2004, 14:25
Sat "Sydney Morning Herald"

Qantas ignores union threats
By Scott Rochfort
July 31, 2004

In the face of vocal union opposition, Qantas will press ahead with plans to establish a 400-strong London crew base on Monday by opening job offers to its 4000 Australian flight attendants.

Despite the threats of industrial action by the Flight Attendants Association of Australia, Qantas said it had received positive feedback from its crews to the move.

"We've had a good level of interest in terms of people contacting in and saying, 'How can I apply'," said Michael Sharp, Qantas's head of communications.

"But the period of [formal job applications] doesn't actually begin until next week so we can't make any comment on specifically how many people."

Qantas expects to save about $18 million a year from the move, given it will cut the cost of meal and hotel allowances and allow more flexibility with its crews.

In a bid to soften any potential opposition by British unions, Qantas confirmed it had already signed a memorandum of understanding with the 1.2 million-member union Amicus, which covers flight attendants.

Under the offer, Qantas flight attendants moving to London will get a £12,220 ($31,750) base salary, an estimated £4000 in "sector pay", £580 in allowances and a £7250 annualised lump sum, taking the total to £24,422 ($63,500) a year.

Crews will also get £600 in private medical insurance and an interest-free loan of £1500 to buy a annual London Tube pass.

The FAAA said the offer translated to a 20 to 31 per cent wage cut, given London crews would be be required to work longer hours - up to 240 hours for every eight-week roster, compared with about 180 hours for Australian crews.

The union said that out of the 932 members who attended meetings this month, only two supported Qantas management's plans for a London crew base.

The flight attendants' union opposes Qantas management breaking the current enterprise agreement, which puts a cap of 370 on the number of flight attendants that can be based overseas. It has also objected to the recent hiring of 150 crew on fixed contracts of eight to nine months.

The head of the FAAA's international division, Michael Mijatov, warned those 150 staff would be "put back on the streets" once the London base opened next June.

Qantas confirmed that it had hired "around 100" international flight attendants on fixed-term contracts.

But it countered union comments the crews would be out of a job once the London base was open. Mr Sharp said most of the staff would return to the casual pool of flight attendants from which they had originally come, or to their original jobs within the airline.

Mr Sharp reiterated that no Australian jobs would be lost from the move to London.

But it is understood the FAAA is more concerned about fixed-term staff being used as strikebreakers. The union has ruled out industrial action until its current enterprise bargaining agreement expires on December 18.

In the meantime, the union will lobby against the London base.

Mr Mijatov will fly to London next week to hold talks with Amicus, the International Transport Workers Federation and several other unions.

The International Transport Workers Federation's aviation secretary, Shane Enright, warned in May that the federation "will do everything that we can to support" the FAAA.

Qantas will meet the FAAA on August 13.

============================================

DirtyPierre
30th Jul 2004, 15:08
Under the offer, Qantas flight attendants moving to London will get a £12,220 ($31,750) base salary, an estimated £4000 in "sector pay", £580 in allowances and a £7250 annualised lump sum, taking the total to £24,422 ($63,500) a year.

Given the expense of living in London (a lot more than Sydney), and that comparing living in the UK where UK residents pay in pounds what we pay in dollars in Oz, the salary is rather poor. This makes the salary look less attractive than the salary being paid to Virgin staff.

Will the flight attendants have to clean the aircraft as well?

Hydrolix
30th Jul 2004, 15:19
Does anyone have any idea of the tax situation that they will be involved with? Will they have to pay full UK tax? If so, then it is a really bad deal. I think that they may struggle to get 400 willing participants when it is looked at more closely.

DirectAnywhere
1st Aug 2004, 23:55
Hydrolix, I think that's the whole point....

Uncommon Sense
2nd Aug 2004, 01:05
Exactly. You don't think QF Management actually expect anyone to take up the offer do you?

But they can now 'honestly' spin that no Australian jobs were lost because these positions were offered to Australian workers first.

Cart_tart
2nd Aug 2004, 01:28
No they can't "honestly" spin that no Aussie jobs were lost!
I was on the shortlist for a cabin crew position. We were told "congratulations"!
Then 15 months later - THE VERY DAY THE LHR BASE WAS ANNOUNCED - we were all dropped.
So I lost out on the job they promised me!