Big Cheese1
30th Dec 2003, 07:28
Hi one and all!!
I recently spoke to the lovely people at OASC in regards to colour perception standards, and found that I'm ok for Weapon Systems Officer(navigator), but not for pilot.
I'm cp3, however, for pilot you need cp2.
I'm just wondering how there can be such a difference betweenthe two when surely for an aircraft such as a tornado you're looking at the same type of screens as the pilot?
My knowledge as to why there would be a difference is very elementary, but if anyone has any insight it would be much appreciated!!
One last point, does anyone know what coule be expected if you were to go down the appeals route? I have heard that at time the medical board can be felexible, and that even though they give the impression of not budging from the requirements, the sometimes do.
Any gen would be great guys and gals
Thanks in advance
BC
I recently spoke to the lovely people at OASC in regards to colour perception standards, and found that I'm ok for Weapon Systems Officer(navigator), but not for pilot.
I'm cp3, however, for pilot you need cp2.
I'm just wondering how there can be such a difference betweenthe two when surely for an aircraft such as a tornado you're looking at the same type of screens as the pilot?
My knowledge as to why there would be a difference is very elementary, but if anyone has any insight it would be much appreciated!!
One last point, does anyone know what coule be expected if you were to go down the appeals route? I have heard that at time the medical board can be felexible, and that even though they give the impression of not budging from the requirements, the sometimes do.
Any gen would be great guys and gals
Thanks in advance
BC