FuelFlow
28th Jan 2001, 21:16
I was wondering what a good T/O MAC would be for a 200ADV.
There seems to be some confusion with our operation, with a lot of different ideas coming up. On tech school we were shown a MAC of 21%(5 units) would be ideal.
The problem seems to arrive with the amount of centre tank fuel loaded. I was thinking that with 11.5 tonnes of fuel, and 100 pax, it would be better to get a T/O MAC of 17%(5.8 units). With the burning off of the centre tank fuel, the C of G should move forward, and then reaarwards with the consumption from the wing tanks. If landing with lets say 5 tonnes on board, the landing MAC should be around 21%(5 units)wich I am led to believe is what we are looking for. To achieve this situation, it is required to load the most of the baggage in the forward hold, and the spillover in the rear hold.
Can anyone comment on this please??
The argument that is coming up, is that the heavier the rear of the A/C is, the more fuel efficient it becomes. It seems to me that on the 200, the more weight you put at the rear of the A/C, the closer you get to the forward limit of the envelope.
Any info will be appreciated.
Thanks FF
There seems to be some confusion with our operation, with a lot of different ideas coming up. On tech school we were shown a MAC of 21%(5 units) would be ideal.
The problem seems to arrive with the amount of centre tank fuel loaded. I was thinking that with 11.5 tonnes of fuel, and 100 pax, it would be better to get a T/O MAC of 17%(5.8 units). With the burning off of the centre tank fuel, the C of G should move forward, and then reaarwards with the consumption from the wing tanks. If landing with lets say 5 tonnes on board, the landing MAC should be around 21%(5 units)wich I am led to believe is what we are looking for. To achieve this situation, it is required to load the most of the baggage in the forward hold, and the spillover in the rear hold.
Can anyone comment on this please??
The argument that is coming up, is that the heavier the rear of the A/C is, the more fuel efficient it becomes. It seems to me that on the 200, the more weight you put at the rear of the A/C, the closer you get to the forward limit of the envelope.
Any info will be appreciated.
Thanks FF