Waterford Airport
Positive news for Waterford;
https://m.independent.ie/business/ir...-41903865.html https://www.wlrfm.com/news/waterford...rothers-263881 |
Think Stobart and what has happened at Carlisle. The clue here is it that they are property developers and have never run an airport.
|
I don't see any reason why this airport cannot support a low cost carrier (there is an obvious one) with for flights to and from London and seasonal flights to/from Europe. Given the ease of use at smaller regional airports it might just become attractive.
Luton was the most popular route. |
Maybe if / when extended they might have a few services from the likes of Ryanair, maybe similar to Knock's operations, but the motorway improvements up to Dublin have been the death knell for any regional operator since Aer Arann and probably would severely impact any viability of any future operations.
|
For me, Waterford's challenge is its location south of the city. This means that for those coming from Kilkenny or Wexford, it's not much handier than Dublin, while for the west of County Waterford, Cork is almost as handy. The poor choice of location is not unique to Waterford in Ireland, but it effectively means it needs to find enough traffic in Waterford City rather than the larger South-East region.
|
Does MOL ever do old fashioned sentimality...and does he have any kind of soft spot for WAT... or is he just a hard-nosed genius focussed on profit ?
|
Hard-nosed. Didn't he register his car as a taxi to avoid certain taxes? And his house as a stately home to get charity status?
|
I guess if MOL had sentiment Ryanair would have been bust about about 30 years whilst they tried to make a profit offering full service on EMB110's and ATR's
|
A profitable route for an airline could still mean massive loses for the airport.
|
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 11276644)
A profitable route for an airline could still mean massive loses for the airport.
The purchase is going ahead and we wish the buyer well. I think there is potential volume sufficient to sustain this little airport. Parking etc is big revenue generator for airports so hopefully it can draw good numbers from the general reguon. It is after all where Ryanair started out. |
Originally Posted by EI-BUD
(Post 11276434)
I don't see any reason why this airport cannot support a low cost carrier (there is an obvious one) with for flights to and from London and seasonal flights to/from Europe. Given the ease of use at smaller regional airports it might just become attractive.
Luton was the most popular route. A lovely little airport to visit, helpful staff and a nice part of Ireland to plan a trip to but let's take the cargo hub and loco operator stuff with a pinch of salt. |
Originally Posted by Consol
(Post 11276763)
Luton was the only route. The runway is too short for jets, turboprops have relatively high operating costs, the motorway to Dublin is too good and Cork and Dublin are roughly equidistant.
A lovely little airport to visit, helpful staff and a nice part of Ireland to plan a trip to but let's take the cargo hub and loco operator stuff with a pinch of salt. |
|
Further Update
Some further news coming out of Waterford, seems like momentum is gathering;
Waterford News & Star 15 November, 2022 Runway extension to start in Q1 2023 By Darren Skelton THE Waterford News & Star understands that construction of the new runway at Waterford Airport will commence in the first quarter of 2023. The build will take nine months, during which time the airport will be closed for all but emergency search and rescue services. Staff at the airport were briefed last week on the new plan, which has been assisted by an investment by the Comer Group who will share 80% ownership in the airport with William Bolster, with the rest made up by Waterford City & County Council (18%) and smaller shareholders (2%). The plan has always been dependent on the Government providing funding which had been previously committed to, but like the North Quays, a new business case had to be submitted due to the rising construction costs Construction of the new runway at Waterford Airport is expected to take nine months to complete. It is believed that verbal assurances have been given regarding this funding and a decision will be made once the business case is submitted. That was expected to happen in October but some design changes has delayed the final costings. This is expected to be resolved before Christmas, with a Government decision to follow shortly after. Speaking earlier this year, the Airport Chairman, Dan Browne said that a PWC report into the viability of the airport suggested investment could lead to the employment of 100 people and generate an annual income of €4.5m.. Mr Browne said: "If we get 5,000 overseas visitors the State will make €730,000 every year. There are also 100 direct and indirect jobs." The new development will involve an extension of the existing 1,433 metre long runway by 491 metres at its northern end and 363 at its southern end, resulting in a total runway length of 2,287 metres and the widening of the existing and extended runway from 30 metres in width to 45 metres in width. This will create a runway that can accommodate large commercial passenger aircraft, such as Boeing 737s and Airbus A320s. When asked what airlines they were expecting to receive interest from, an Airport source told the Waterford News & Star "build it and they will come": https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....33ca9d9e9.jpeg |
If they're prepared to hand out considerable sweeteners I'm sure Ryanair will fancy a few flights.
|
More money then sense. The airport will run at a permanent loss.
|
‘Build it and they’ll come’ what, like Doncaster?
|
Ryanair have made a statement that they will look at a London service once the runway is completed.
I'd say a deal is already done but they are not announcing it yet. |
Originally Posted by The 5Q
(Post 11331412)
Ryanair have made a statement that they will look at a London service once the runway is completed.
I'd say a deal is already done but they are not announcing it yet. And last I heard, FR has a LTN base. Easy drop in for FR for a quieter off peak time to test the water initially. Then, if the route is sustainable, which I expect it will be on a 189 seater with decent yield, perhaps more convenient timings together with a robust schedule can be introduced. Emerald may also fancy a crack as their ORK plans have been prematurely negated by the plethora of new FR routes launched recently. CP. |
The investment for 854m of extra runway would need more than one flight a day to London to justify it.
I can imagine summer flights to Malaga and Faro working, and maybe a Winter Canaries flight. Are there any other possibles? Maybe Birmingham in an ATR, although that wouldn't need the extension. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:53. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.