|
TFS bus crash lawsuit
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 10608834)
It's clearly an airport issue - it's irrelevant which a/c the pax got off (which was how I read ATNotts original point).
He said: “This was a very complex case due to the number of people affected as well as the need to liaise with foreign authorities. “However, I can confirm all 33 cases are now concluded. “Our clients should have been enjoying their holiday and instead they were left with injuries. A Jet2 spokesman said: “Although we were not responsible for the accident, which took place between two vehicles driven by airport staff, we do of course acknowledge the distress that it must have caused. We now consider this matter closed.” I guess the lawyers would have class auctioned the TFS airport authority, the airlines' handling agent (and who drove the buses) and likely Jet2 also as the pax were in their care... May have been a joint liability settlement. anyway case closed now |
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 10608834)
It's clearly an airport issue - it's irrelevant which a/c the pax got off (which was how I read ATNotts original point).
|
Originally Posted by ATNotts
(Post 10608868)
I actually interpreted it as the issue being on the transfer between resort and airport, which is why I considered it totally irrelevant to Jet2 (the airline). That of course was an incorrect assumption.
|
vWill Jet 2 be the Evelop 330 again next year ? Seems to be a nice aircraft . |
Thought they were getting the other Air Tanker machine to be based at Manchester
|
Talking to a jet 2. bod he said they may have up to 4 x 330 aircraft next year! |
Looks like LSAG had a fun night. been circling off the coast of TFS for about 2 hours now. Not got any higher than 7000ft |
Originally Posted by nowhereasfiled
(Post 10610142)
Looks like LSAG had a fun night. been circling off the coast of TFS for about 2 hours now. Not got any higher than 7000ft FR24 seems to suggest this was a revenue flight. Perhaps a (not too serious) problem was detected after take off and this was a fuel-burning exercise before returning to TFS? They must’ve been dizzy after that! |
Simple answer - No fuel dump on the 757 however IIRC it was certified to land back at Max Take-off Weight and therefore has no need for fuel dump facilities.
A320 family - ditto. |
You are quite correct: no dump in the 75. Also the 75, as are most aircraft, certified to land at Max TOW. However it would require an overweight land check. So why no burn down to landing weight? Better still IMO, no knowing the facts, steam North and land in Malaga. Closer to Blighty, easier repat if bad tech problem? |
Going by Jethro's website the first two A321 will be ex TCX G-TCVC & G-TCVD which are at Lasham.
|
Originally Posted by BFS BHD
(Post 10610687)
Going by Jethro's website the first two A321 will be ex TCX G-TCVC & G-TCVD which are at Lasham.
|
Originally Posted by Ivan aromer
(Post 10610674)
You are quite correct: no dump in the 75. Also the 75, as are most aircraft, certified to land at Max TOW. However it would require an overweight land check. So why no burn down to landing weight? Better still IMO, no knowing the facts, steam North and land in Malaga. Closer to Blighty, easier repat if bad tech problem? |
It's quite likely the ex-Thomas Cook aircraft will be re-registered before they enter service with Jet2. Possible sequence could be JZA*, if it hasn't already been allocated.
|
Originally Posted by ROC10
(Post 10610172)
Wow that does not look good... FR24 seems to suggest this was a revenue flight. Perhaps a (not too serious) problem was detected after take off and this was a fuel-burning exercise before returning to TFS? They must’ve been dizzy after that! |
Originally Posted by Mooncrest
(Post 10610756)
It's quite likely the ex-Thomas Cook aircraft will be re-registered before they enter service with Jet2. Possible sequence could be JZA*, if it hasn't already been allocated.
|
If the first two listed A321 are correct then it will be a surprise as it will mean A321's with a mix of both V2500 & CFM engines, if they are going to all come from TCX.
Jethro's is an excellent web site, which l have submitted info to over the years, but remember it is only as good as the info he is given, very difficult for him to know 100% if that info is correct. |
None of the ex-ZB Airbuses are going to Jet2. The first 6 are TCDD, DP, DE, DK, DB, DG all from storage Shannon. |
Originally Posted by nowhereasfiled
(Post 10610863)
None of the ex-ZB Airbuses are going to Jet2. The first 6 are TCDD, DP, DE, DK, DB, DG all from storage Shannon. |
Originally Posted by Mooncrest
(Post 10610756)
It's quite likely the ex-Thomas Cook aircraft will be re-registered before they enter service with Jet2. Possible sequence could be JZA*, if it hasn't already been allocated.
Plenty of others to choose from though. Jet2 owned reg's currently start with A, B, F, H, L and T W is also out, as they lease these from Titan That leaves upto 19 different options |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 06:34. |
Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.