PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   Petition to remove liquids restriction for UK aircrew (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/579857-petition-remove-liquids-restriction-uk-aircrew.html)

ETOPS 2nd Jun 2016 20:55

Petition to remove liquids restriction for UK aircrew
 
Please folow the link to sign...

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131431

T250 2nd Jun 2016 22:09

Hasn't this been done before and had a woeful outcome?

Besides, there are far more pressing issues for the UK government to be dealing with than this right now... :zzz:

beardy 3rd Jun 2016 05:42

Strangely 'government' can do more than one thing at a time.

Signed

El Bunto 3rd Jun 2016 08:46

If it was a petition to remove liquids restrictions for passengers, too, I might be interested. But introducing exemptions for crew alone would just lead to confusion at the 'security' lanes.

Pilots can well afford to buy a bottle of water and a yoghurt at the airside Boots.

OhNoCB 3rd Jun 2016 09:57

It doesn't lead to confusion anywhere else in Europe. Its also not really about affordability - I would rather bring things that I have bought and chosen than be stuck with having to make a choice from an often woeful selection at airside shops. Not to mention with some companys/airports you will never actually be in the terminal building.

PDR1 3rd Jun 2016 10:09

It would introduce the new security risk of people smuggling items airside by impersonating aircrew (wear the uniform, strut around importantly and only cast a glance at non-aircrew types when looking for something to spit at - it's not hard). The idea is that airside is a sanitised box - you don't drill holes in the walls of operating theatres so that the surgeons can grab their fags...

PDR

Chesty Morgan 3rd Jun 2016 10:15

An over sized yogurt is now an new security risk?

Don't you think impersonating aircrew has been tried before only with things that go bang? It's not exactly a new thing so strangely there are procedures in place.

PDR1 3rd Jun 2016 11:22

...and this petition is seeking to remove them. That's kinda the point!

PDR

Chesty Morgan 3rd Jun 2016 11:25

Nope, it's asking to remove the liquid restrictions on crew. Not to remove any and every restriction on anyone passing through security.

Anyone impersonating aircrew is still as likely to get nicked.

PDR1 3rd Jun 2016 11:45

Of course. that can never happen. Can it.

:)

PDR

Tim91 3rd Jun 2016 11:50

And what about ATC? Not just flight crew who should be exempt. ATC have just as much 'right' given their access at their workplace as you guys claim to. :=

Chesty Morgan 3rd Jun 2016 12:11

PDR, of course it can. That's why I said it was still as likely. Although since those incidents awareness of its possibility will be raised.

I'm not sure that anyone will go to the lengths required to access airside as an active crew member just so they can take their toothpaste with them though.

mustrum_ridcully 3rd Jun 2016 12:19

Hmmm, what could possibly go wrong, it's not like there might be international rules and regulations that prevent this?

beardy 3rd Jun 2016 13:10

The rules that prevent aircrew from taking larger containers of fluids through security in the UK and showing them separately are UK rules. In other parts of the world NO crew are subject to these restrictions, their security personnel seem to be able to cope with understanding and recognising the difference between aircrew and passengers. And yes we can fly from there to here making a mockery of our home grown policy.

Mr A Tis 3rd Jun 2016 13:13


international rules and regulations that prevent this?
Travel around South America and there are no liquid restrictions for anyone.
Travel around Asia, not much attention is paid to what is "scanned"

A multi million security empire has emerged to prevent that dodgy yoghurt passing from one side of a counter to another.

As we have seen, determined bad guys, will always find a way - yoghurt bans or not.

Centre cities 3rd Jun 2016 14:31

Why should the general members of the travelling public trust air crew more than anyone else.

There are recent events that suggest that they should not.

Centre cities

beardy 3rd Jun 2016 16:27

If they don't trust the crew, don't fly.

What an absurd conjecture you posit.

TCAS FAN 3rd Jun 2016 17:00

A UK airport that I often use has an apparent exemption in order that the fire crew, who within the Restricted Zone (UK definition), can take liquids airside, for example milk and soft drinks, with a summary sight by security staff. Makes a complete nonsense of the ban.

G-TYNE 3rd Jun 2016 18:32

Anyone remember a guy called Andreas Lubitz?

Aircrew are not a master race free from corruption of the mind and should be subject to the same restrictions as everyone else.

DaveReidUK 3rd Jun 2016 18:34


Originally Posted by TCAS FAN (Post 9397940)
A UK airport that I often use has an apparent exemption in order that the fire crew, who within the Restricted Zone (UK definition), can take liquids airside, for example milk and soft drinks, with a summary sight by security staff. Makes a complete nonsense of the ban.

On the contrary, it sounds eminently sensible to me.

If my flight is going to end up a smouldering wreck on a UK runway, I'll be hoping that the boys and girls of the ARFF crew have had their daily pintas.


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:32.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.