EMA was closed at weekend in November 2016 - so 20% up is very misleading.
If you take the November 2015 figure which was 220,694 then compare this to November 2017, then the gain was under 1,200 pax ! |
Extra Services from Jet2, over the summer holidays (27th July to 3rd Sep)
Extra IBZ/HER/DLM/AYT and a new BJV flight. Nice to see some growth here compared to BHX/STN, albeit very small and brief |
The Independent 30th Jan 2018.
The secret code that lets you get a surprise engagement ring through airport security | The Independent |
UPS
Planning permission has been granted for the new UPS logistics hub, which is to be built to the East of the Eastern apron.
The airport have previously spoken about demolishing the existing UPS hub to free up space for additional stands on the central apron, but considering the current and projected growth of freight at EMA, is it likely that it will now be retained for the medium term and offered to FDX or even Amazon? There have been rumours circulating to that effect. |
and DHL are rumoured to be looking at extending again further to the west even though they've only just finished the existing expansion
|
New for S19 are Santorini & Faro with TUI.
|
DHL
I don know that the ramp is being extended they are taking some of jet parks 2 over
|
Originally Posted by Paul Atkins144
(Post 10100924)
I don know that the ramp is being extended they are taking some of jet parks 2 over
|
I recently used EMA for the first time in about 20 years. I'm afraid I wasn't impressed. The owners seem to be trying to extend the aviation offering without themselves investing, and the end result is, from a passenger point of view, poor. The airport is obviously operating at above its comfortable capacity (in mid-April), so in summer it will be a place to avoid.
My main gripes are: - UK Border area far too small - essentially outdoor covered walkways airside not fit for purpose - extremely limited and uncompetitive retail offering in both departures and arrivals - poor signposting around the airport estate - shabby and visually unappealing buildings In comparison, I was very impressed by Liverpool Airport, which is a similar size in terms of passenger throughput. Time for a bit of serious investment. In the meantime Mrs LGS won't be booking EMA flights. |
Whilst the Airport Building isn't that appealing and agree it needs some investment it does what is required, as long as you arrive check in and board your flight what more do you want, if Liverpool appeals more then by all means use Liverpool but I for one wouldn't think of using anywhere but EMA as it suits my requirements
I suppose when MAG feel the time is right they will invest in the terminal facilities In the meantime it serves it's purpose |
The time will be right when they can make enough out of retail to cover their investment I would say.
There are those who like me like to buy their daughter Joe Malone perfume etc. when going though an airport I suppose- and those who aren't bothered. |
Originally Posted by Stu707
(Post 10117381)
Whilst the Airport Building isn't that appealing and agree it needs some investment it does what is required, as long as you arrive check in and board your flight what more do you want, if Liverpool appeals more then by all means use Liverpool but I for one wouldn't think of using anywhere but EMA as it suits my requirements
I suppose when MAG feel the time is right they will invest in the terminal facilities In the meantime it serves it's purpose Thankfully for EMA, cargo is a completely different kettle of fish, as it is a major base for all the major global integrators, who appreciate the requirements for top class handling facilities to satisfy their blue chip global customers. |
Speaking of cargo - Etihad cargo have added a Saturday morning rotation to the existing Tuesday evening, using the 777f Columbus-EMA-Frankfurt upping to 2 weekly
|
Jet2 new route - Burgas for summer 19 1 weekly begins May 07th 2019 |
Here is the East Midlands you were looking for.
|
Originally Posted by fjencl
(Post 10181465)
Here is the East Midlands you were looking for.
Thankyou, but still a very quiet thread for a reasonably vibrant airport. |
Originally Posted by Planespeaking
(Post 10181469)
Thankyou, but still a very quiet thread for a reasonably vibrant airport. Having grown weary of BHX and its business model of treating its customers as badly as possible, for 2019 i have replaced my LS1229/30 flights with EMA flights LS613/4. The pricing is slightly dearer but, deep joy, the dep dep time is mid morning and not late afternoon. Also the car oarking cost is very reasonable and access, certainly via the A42 looks a doddle. Whats not to like? |
Future Ramp Space With the continued rapid expansion of freight volumes through EMA, it seems strange that the new UPS hub is being sited so as to prevent any future Easterly extension of the Eastern cargo ramp (apart from a small addition for which planning permission has been granted). I would have thought that a N-S alignment of the facility closer to the A453 would have been possible, which would then have offered greater flexibility for additional ramp provision in the future? I know there are many considerations which have obviously influenced the final decision, such as UPS seeing their short term freight volume increases being carried by larger equipment rather than additional flights, and the proposed alignment of the new facility allowing easy linear expansion in the future, but there must surely come a time in the not too distant future when addition cargo ramp space will be required? There is obviously scope for further expansion of the DHL facility and the Western ramp, but is anyone aware of how the airport are looking to accommodate future expansion by the other/new carriers? Balair |
Originally Posted by Balair
(Post 10191676)
Future Ramp Space With the continued rapid expansion of freight volumes through EMA, it seems strange that the new UPS hub is being sited so as to prevent any future Easterly extension of the Eastern cargo ramp (apart from a small addition for which planning permission has been granted). I would have thought that a N-S alignment of the facility closer to the A453 would have been possible, which would then have offered greater flexibility for additional ramp provision in the future? I know there are many considerations which have obviously influenced the final decision, such as UPS seeing their short term freight volume increases being carried by larger equipment rather than additional flights, and the proposed alignment of the new facility allowing easy linear expansion in the future, but there must surely come a time in the not too distant future when addition cargo ramp space will be required? There is obviously scope for further expansion of the DHL facility and the Western ramp, but is anyone aware of how the airport are looking to accommodate future expansion by the other/new carriers? Balair |
Originally Posted by Balair
(Post 10191676)
Future Ramp Space |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:45. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.