PPRuNe Forums - Antwerp airport

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)

- Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)

- - Antwerp airport (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/530397-antwerp-airport.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by DIBO (Post 11510354)

Just to be clear, I was referring to Nador/Tanger that cannot be booked as a vacation destination out of Antwerp, only flights can be booked.

For all other existing destinations, it's indeed as you state:

Many thanks for clarifying that, it's appreciated 👍

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sotonsean (Post 11510307)

Are you telling me Tel Aviv is just a "holiday resort"🤔

No, far from it just google Tel Aviv holidays.

Quote:

Originally Posted by N707ZS (Post 11510421)

No, far from it just google Tel Aviv holidays.

I know I know already, being half Jewish myself and having been to Tel Aviv as I've previously mentioned I'm absolutely aware of that fact 🤔

Now that the dust has settled and things are back to normal (for the time being) some minor ANR news:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myself

Today, re-start of the seasonal flights Bolzano BZO - ANR operating the Q400.
First ANR-BZO flight of the season started with an excellent 95% load-factor!

Quote:

Originally Posted by ahwalk01 (Post 11510001)

I've flown LCY-ANR on Luxair, good trip on the DHC-8

For the pilots and pax, users of Antwerp Airport, you might consider joining in on this pro-airport petition (webpage in EN, description in Dutch and the only translation Google can't offer is: 'Deurne' is the district of Antwerp where the Antwerp Airport is located)
https://petitie.be/petitions/ja-voor...1786?locale=en

The renewal procedure for the environmental permit, has had more than 4000 objections registered with among others, persons on the Greenpeace payroll, organizing professional petition rallies in major train stations, etc.
And the anti-airport campaigners confounding 'airport expansion' (which is unacceptable to most people and impossible given the airport's location), with 'airport growth' (within the existing constraints), was purely by mistake I presume.
That the previous environmental permit imposed already a training-flights reduction from 23.000 in 2009 to 8.000 in 2023, apparently is still not enough for the anti campaigners....