PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   Excel Airways (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/219439-excel-airways.html)

TSR2 17th Sep 2008 19:07

1flygirl
 
I note that you state in your letter that you are appalled at some passengers lack of thought .....

I heard of the demise of XL whilst on holiday and very shortly after the initial announcement. I can assure you that my initial thoughts were for the welfare of all XL employees and particularly those 'down line' at the time. I can only imagine the stress involved in finding yourself unemployed under such dreadful circumstances.

As you say, for the unfortunate passengers it is just a mere inconvenience when compared with the potentially life changing upheaval for the employees.

Having had the pleasure of travelling with XL (and Excel Airways) many times in the past few years, I have a high regard for the professionalism at XL and sincerely hope that you all find suitable alternative employment in the very near future.

May I extend a very public thank you to all XL staff for your services in the past.

AircraftOperations 17th Sep 2008 19:12

2x 739s MAN to Lasham I believe.

stue 17th Sep 2008 19:58

Bye Bye AP and AR!:(

Standard Noise 18th Sep 2008 02:08

Someone is paying off some of XL's debts, the 738 at Bristol is no longer blocked in and is going to Lasham in the next day or two. Can only assume a deal has been done with the airport management. Seems the handling agent isn't happy though, from what I hear, they're refusing to push it back off stand so it's kind of still stuck here.

tflier 18th Sep 2008 08:10

Looking for Kieran Kielly, ex dan ex virgin and xl, sorry about the pun. I need to contact him urgently if he was made redundant from xl, as I have a job offer for him. contact me on [email protected]

Lauderdale 18th Sep 2008 08:56


Looking for Kieran Kielly, ex dan ex virgin and xl, sorry about the pun. I need to contact him urgently if he was made redundant from xl, as I have a job offer for him. contact me on http://www.pprune.org/newreply.php?e...83e0aa742f7c87
Ex GB as well?

Gatwickba 18th Sep 2008 09:11

The 767 in full XL livery left LGW last night about 1800hrs.....any ideas where its gone?

Over+Out 18th Sep 2008 09:31

EGHL with the others?

jethro15 18th Sep 2008 09:38

G-VNKG left Gatwick for Toronto 17 Sep

jethro

G-STAW 18th Sep 2008 11:47

all the remaining xl 737's departed today, after a rep from the leasing company paid 300K to MAN Plc to have them back. Then my company refused to push them as they owed us another 150k+ in bills, finally they paid it back late last night, so we got them away earlier today, not a nice sight really.

fairwell to XL

G-STAW

SpringHeeledJack 18th Sep 2008 12:44


after a rep from the leasing company paid 300K to MAN Plc to have them back. Then my company refused to push them as they owed us another 150k+ in bills, finally they paid it back late last night
Just as a matter of interest, why would the leasing company be liable for the debts incurred by XL at MAN for their impounded aircraft ? The debts would surely be arranged to be settled through PHWC, the liquidators ?

Or was it simply a case of said leasing Co wanting to cut through the red-tape and get their property back and earning revenue elsewhere asap ?


Regards


SHJ

Love_joy 18th Sep 2008 13:13


why would the leasing company be liable for the debts incurred by XL
They would probably have a claim in with the administrators for that, but its more than likely a simple case of damage limitation.

Thoughts are with all the XL crews and their families at this time

Speedy123 18th Sep 2008 14:21

Debt stays with the aircraft, so if the leasing company wanted the plane back they would have to pay up.

G-STAW 18th Sep 2008 14:50


Just as a matter of interest, why would the leasing company be liable for the debts incurred by XL at MAN for their impounded aircraft ? The debts would surely be arranged to be settled through PHWC, the liquidators
The lessor wanted their planes back there and then, they wasn't leaving without them. Its not they they'll liable for the debt, but they wanted their planes back, and why not?obviously the planes are now being prepared for lease with another carrier, maybe kissair?!?

also remember it would of taken alot longer for the administrators to process legal stuff and to return the planes to the lessor, than it would for the lessor to take on the debt, its just s matter of speeding the process up.

This has simplified things for the lessor, Now the lessor will chase the administartors for the now outstanding monies owed to them, this is in access of £450K.

G-STAW

SpringHeeledJack 18th Sep 2008 15:53


Debt stays with the aircraft, so if the leasing company wanted the plane back they would have to pay up.
I don't doubt this, but how does something that a company 'hires' have anything to do with the company apart from a tool for the job, albeit a big and very expensive tool ?! It's not a physical liability outside of the contractual obligations of the lease wet/dry etc and belongs to someone else and hopefully legally protected from such claims.


The lessor wanted their planes back there and then, they wasn't leaving without them. Its not they they'll liable for the debt, but they wanted their planes back, and why not?obviously the planes are now being prepared for lease with another carrier, maybe kissair?!?

also remember it would of taken alot longer for the administrators to process legal stuff and to return the planes to the lessor, than it would for the lessor to take on the debt, its just s matter of speeding the process up.

This has simplified things for the lessor, Now the lessor will chase the administartors for the now outstanding monies owed to them, this is in access of £450K.
I'd have done the same, rather than have the assets sitting somewhere not bringing in revenue. Hopefully there will be some solidarity within the market sector to tell KissAir to kiss their...... I know it's business and legal, but these things are morally wrong and those with influence should use it!


Regards


SHJ

dupont3700 19th Sep 2008 07:01

Where has their 330 gone to?

xlskyguy 19th Sep 2008 09:41

XL Uk didnt have an A330 it belonged to XL France who are trading strong :mad: Seems wrong that they bought out almost bankrupt Star Airlines and rebranded to XL France........... Also german airline on its ass ..... and hey both are going strong while XL UK falls on its ass......... ironic !!!!!!

Muizenberg 19th Sep 2008 09:48

History repeats itself 1991...
 
Is this not very similar to the ILG/Air Europe failure in 1991...

Air Europa, and Air Europe SPA (Italy) continued, whilst the UK airline saw it's demise.:{

jethro15 19th Sep 2008 09:53


Where has their 330 gone to?
Returned to XL France 12 Sep

XL UK fleet status as of 19 Sep

captplaystation 19th Sep 2008 09:54

Don't know if ironic is the word I would use, manipulative bordering on fraudulent may be closer to the mark. Don't know if we will ever ( publically) know the truth, but the emergence (or not) of KissAir will be a fairly strong indication, particularly if they are using XL airframes.
As always, sh 1 tea always floats to the top.

boredcounter 19th Sep 2008 10:04

Years ago
 
The debt for ground charges stayed with the reg, not the aircraft itself. Hence the rapid re-register of the airframe, to the degree of corrupting one digit. I believe, the Reg is attatched to a frame number, until cancelled by the CAA or another reg is allocated at owners re-registration?

exmuppet 19th Sep 2008 19:33

Rubbish
 
Charter guy is a prat, you do NOT know what you are talking about - Viking Airlines is on the Scandinavian reg so your comment on crews are rubbish like the majority of comment you pen!

PW put his heart and sole into refinancing the business he built up from nothing! - it was the Icelandic banks that ensured XLLG's demise.

If you recall it was the two banks that put the price tag on the business back in Nov 06 and effectively burdoned the business with excessive debt. It was also the same banks that until the 11th hour refused to take any write down on the afore mentioned debt (they effectively wanted their money again) which just was not realistic in the current climate.

These banks were indicating that they would continue to support XL as a going concern until the 11th hour when both parties refused to put in any more working capital, to add insult to injury they then announced 24hrs later that they were going to write off the entire debt...IF THEY HAD DONE THIS ONLY 1 WEEK EARLIER THE BUSINESS WOULD NOT HAVE FAILED !!! it would have been refinanced and been in good shape with little or now debt and with oil and currency where it is today MADE A DECENT PROFIT IN FY 2009...

I have the upmost sympathy for all that lost their jobs, i am one of them, but please stop the personnal attacks and look at the facts....if you want to take your anger out on anyone its the banks that should be in the firing line! Not individuals...........

Ballymoss 19th Sep 2008 22:36


PW put his heart and sole into refinancing the business he built up from nothing!
:rolleyes:

'the business he built up from nothing'..........I don't believe this bit's true

Rgds
The Moss:ok:

hogarth1 19th Sep 2008 22:56

As long as PW has not been made bankrupt as an individual, he is allowed to try and do what he like`s (i.e. start another airline!!) Its a sad fact,:( but true. As long as can get the funding its his business. Its sucks, but sadly thats the law! ( Still looking for work - need a kiss, but not his! )

carbis22 20th Sep 2008 06:32

charter guy,

hear! hear!

The interview that PW gave was the most insincere i have witnessed, with the exception of prehaps bush/clinton.....

Head down... sniff.... head down... sniff...., yeah right!!

XL were very very good at scamming people, and lying through their teeth, their 76's where peices of junk from country's where CAA heads where jailed, and it was alledged parts not ICAO and FAA certified.

And if what an earlier post was stating is correct, XL where doing GOV runs for millions, this may explain why pax where sat at airports for 25-50 hrs on a regular basis, and then they would not even pay the poor pax the correct compensation for breach of EC regs that they are entitled to and try and cover it with a tech fault,, double edged bet, the best of both worlds... double payment for a dangerous, awful service...

This is one airline that should be out of business, and would be a crime if he were allowed to run another!!

exmuppet 20th Sep 2008 08:50

CharterPrat
 
I am not going to even comment on PW being involved in Viking as it is irrelevant, fact is Viking has been around for many years and successfully trading, therefore it is not a new set up replacing XL!

The point I am making is that the senior team at XL (inc Phil) worked night and day to get the business refinaced, yes this failed and EVERYBODY is gutted !! XL had an excellent team on the ground and in the air. The business had been turned around and although it would have lost a small amount of money this FY it was nothing considering the fuel bill had gone up by circa usd90m - it was the debt that killed it from the MBO...

I understand the anger, I feel the same but these personnal attacks are not justified .... really not sure why you are so vocal you have not lost your job!

PS - you are not as close to this as you think...

exmuppet 20th Sep 2008 09:02

carbiss22 is a disgrace!
 
why should xl be out of business! it had 1700 excellent employees now all out of work...

the 767's were all being replaced by a330's the shorhaul fleet was already the youngest in the market....XL punctuality was second to none and headed up the tables...the onboard product was also fantastic

Manchester 'on time' stats for Aug just published - XL were top by miles, this is a credit to all at XL that were still giving 110% despite the uncertain future.....

IDIOT!

dalmation67 20th Sep 2008 09:04

CARBIS22

Please choose your words carefully 'This is an airline that should be out of business', not helpful or appropriate my friend!

If PW is or has been involved in dodgey dealings/practices which caused or contributed to the demise of XLLG then I agree, that he and only he along with any of his cronies on the board including a former Silverjet Director, PO, that participated should be held accountable. Hopefully if an investigation is launched after BALPA contacted the Government things may start to show what really went on.

Mr Crocodile Tears, PW, is, as I put on an earlier post in this thread, a 'Barrow Boy' who has no etiquette or professionalism which I had the misfortune to witness 2 years ago when he stood at the front of a base meeting and did nothing but F and Jeff about p**S poor performance of the aircraft which HE chose to inherit from the AAE merger....not something you'd expect from a CEO.

As for the faithful and loyal staff who are left trying to make sense of it all and pick up the pieces of their lives.....we don't deserve to read thoughtless comments like the one you have just posted:=

We believed in XL Airways and strove to make it a real competitor and a success....which it was in the industry up until last Friday 12th Sept, sadly we were badly let down by; Management, The Icelandics & the Banks.

Finally, (getting off my soap box), I don't believe one word from PM in the TTG interview that PW isn't connected to Kissflights.......too many coincidences and I hope the CAA do investigate and prevent this from even getting off the ground.

"Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid PW.....we're on to you"!:ok:

Exmuppet I have to say your loyality to PW is admirable but sadly falling on deaf ears.....

spinnaker 20th Sep 2008 09:42


Originally Posted by exmuppet
I am not going to even comment on PW being involved in Viking as it is irrelevant, fact is Viking has been around for many years and successfully trading, therefore it is not a new set up replacing XL!

Highly relevant I would have thought. Major airline company goes into administration, new venture launched within days, same routes, etc.etc. Are you serious that in today's economic climate this wouldn't attract attention.

I find the interview with PM Strange considering its a 'New' start up company. He seems to spend more time explaining away associations and making denials, rather than telling the world what a great company this new venture will be, or at least that's what most new companies would do, don't you think.

How can you deny that this is a new venture when PM says it is?

Every journo in town must be watching this one, and I suspect the regulators are as well, quite rightly so.

carbis22 20th Sep 2008 10:04

Muppet!!
 
Do you really think I give a damm what names you choose to call me,
this information has already been posted on pprune some time ago, and as for XL's fantastic time keeping, check out other forums to see what people actually thought, and read their experiences, it dont take einstein to figure out, oh and the recent holiday which review, think XL came second to last!
Again do not blame the staff, always comes down to bad management!

Whilst the NICE ex- staff of XL, and only the NICE ones have my sympathy, it is my hope they will move on to better things, and to a more secure employer that will not leave them high and dry as this one did..

as that is what the true disgrace is here!!

mary_hinge 20th Sep 2008 10:17

Exmuppet.

You say
If you recall it were the two banks that put the price tag on the business back in Nov 06 and effectively burdened the business with excessive debt. It was also the same banks that until the 11th hour refused to take any write down on the afore mentioned debt (they effectively wanted their money again) which just was not realistic in the current climate.

These banks were indicating that they would continue to support XL as a going concern until the 11th hour when both parties refused to put in any more working capital, to add insult to injury they then announced 24hrs later that they were going to write off the entire debt...IF THEY HAD DONE THIS ONLY 1 WEEK EARLIER THE BUSINESS WOULD NOT HAVE FAILED !!! it would have been refinanced and been in good shape with little or now debt and with oil and currency where it is today MADE A DECENT PROFIT IN FY 2009...”


Now I could be wrong, but surely at the Management Buyout, the team new how much they needed to borrow. The banks would not assist without a guarantee. This was provided by Eimskip. http://www.icelandreview.com/icelandreview/daily_news/?cat_id=21123&ew_0_a_id=311913

The loan was principally from Barclays and was due for repayment / rescheduling in May this year. Barclays pulled the plug early September, 4 months later than they could have done, as it become clear that things were going to get rough. A stock exchange message was posted in Iceland to the effect. Eimskip put provisions in place to absorb this loan.
http://www.lloydslist.com/ll/news/eimskip-investors-may-acquire-e207m-loan/20017569463.htm

Having been through the busiest period of the year, just prior to the Winter wind down and with aircraft heavy maintenance due, to ask for more working capital was a good indication that the Winter would be the end.

PW had an good airline and product, the results of 1700 hard working individuals (like your self) now without work and who my heart goes out to. But I do feel that some questions should be raised regarding certain business practices by PW and also certain Icelandic investment houses.

Don’t forget that Eimskip is a daughter company of Avion, Now who did Avion own…..

smith 20th Sep 2008 10:33

Heard a rumour that XL have gone bust, can't find any info on here. Apparntly thousands of passengers stranded abroad. Surely not, can anyone confirm this?

kick the tires 20th Sep 2008 10:42

exmuppet

they then announced 24hrs later that they were going to write off the entire debt...IF THEY HAD DONE THIS ONLY 1 WEEK EARLIER THE BUSINESS WOULD NOT HAVE FAILED !!!
Have a think about what you have written! Its a bit like me phoning my credit card company up today and saying: "would you mind writing off my balance?". It'd be very nice for me, a clean sheet and no debt! But whilst there is a chance of them getting their money they will refuse.

But if I had absolutley no way of paying it off because I was broke and had no job, they might zero the balance and cut their losses.

Chicken and egg syndrome!

jhangiani 20th Sep 2008 11:23

As an Ex-employee of XL, I can state that the Staff did give 110% Professionalism up to the very end, and maybe the mangement did, maybe the management did'nt, but 1700 of us are now slowly picking up the pieces and begining to get on with our lives, XL going bust cannot be changed it is now past history, and that said is'nt it really time for everybody to move on, whether you were directly involved or not, and as for our Glorious CEO well, The Law of Karma will eventually catch up with him, for whatever wrong doing that has been done will be rectified in one way shape or form.

XL did'nt always get good reviews and we all were aware of that, and yes the 76 fleet were'nt exactly young, but they were maintained to the highest standards and flown to the highest standards.

But i really do think this Ghost Forum really should be laid to rest, and i know it is a forum and people can post what they like, but the fact is XL has gone now and i am sure there will be more exciting things to debate about in the near future.


REST IN PEACE XL GOD SPEED ALL THOSE THAT WERE WITH HER UNTIL THE VERY END :):):):):)

captplaystation 20th Sep 2008 12:19

smith,
you have a strange concept of humour ? ?
If not, please try and get up to speed.

exmuppet 20th Sep 2008 12:34

mary hinge
 
what you forget is:

1. The loan was from Landisbanki garenteed by emskip (then avion), both companies owned by Magnus T, XL was also owened by Avion, think about it, its avion saying I will sell you back the company for more than it worth so our books look good and my sister company will lend you the money..

2, Barclays were not owed money - they provided the hedge possitions on both fuel and FX, when the market moved against the hedge ie oil fell they demanded XL cover their exposure.

3, Emskip is the new name for avion - they are not sister companies

exmuppet 20th Sep 2008 12:38

kick they tires
 
Totally agree but if they took a write down of say 50%, the company would have been refinaced, XL would be in business today and the banks would still have a decent stake in a going concern....

anyway water under the bridge now.....

just_registered 20th Sep 2008 16:02

exmuppet
 
your posts have got me intrigued.

If we believe what you say, and XL were just unlucky that the refinance was not sorted out at the 11th hour or before, why did PW's solicitor register Kissflights.

I have to say, your poor spelling, punctuation, and random CAPITALISATION to make your point, remind me of someone, but I thought the papers said you were mid-forties:ooh:

PPRuNe Pop 20th Sep 2008 16:28

Listen up please.

Do not make allegations of mis-doings or name names on PPRuNe. Please keep your comments to standard and don't be tempted to overstate or play a game of chase the wolf.

PPP

mary_hinge 20th Sep 2008 17:19

Exmuppet.
Landisbank is not owned by Magnus. Magnus did own Avion Group. Avion Group then became Hf. Eimskipafélag Íslands. Islands is then split into the Shipping and Logistics, which is Eimskip, And Aviation services. The Aviation services division was sold off mid 2007. Magnus T stood down 4th Q 2007 http://www.eimskip.com/PortalData/1/...7_LQ_final.pdf

You also wrote " think about it, its avion saying I will sell you back the company for more than it worth so our books look good and my sister company will lend you the money."

But KPMG said "KPMG’s resignation came after staff at XL arranged to delay the payment of invoices to Alpha Airports, an airline catering company. The delay flattered XL’s figures ahead of the flotation of its then parent company, Avion, on the Icelandic stock exchange.
XL Leisure ignored probe into ‘irregularities’ - Times Online

I do believe though that we will all know what did happen quite soon


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:44.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.