Worth bearing in mind also is the amount of interlining traffic from GB services on to other BA ervices at MAN. PFP - OSL, AGP - IOM, TFS - JFK, AGP - GLA/ABZ/BHD, MLA - JFK have all been trends noted, no doubt. A couple of times in the last month there have been significant transfer pax coming in on the BA JFK connecting on to a GB Malaga.
|
Youre right. GB arnot basing 3 planes at Man.
It's 4! And it will be 6 by 2007.:ok: |
6!! Are you sure about that?!
|
I think i have heard the figure being four but after the second aircraft arrives on saturday, there wont be a third until 2007. All could change though.
Yes GB have been feeding BA's JFK thus i would imagine making it even more profitable. :p BA still blind to the fact that this could happen on other long haul routes should this wish to start any.:O |
Hi
Does anyone know which BA flights are moving to T1 in November and why? Thanks |
None it is just T3 been intergrated into T1 as the ownership agreement is up.
|
I believe T3 is too remain, it is not being intergrated into T1
|
I hope T3 is to remain. So what if it is "attached" to terminal 1. It is infact, in my view, a terminal in it's own right. How confusing would an enlarged T1 be with another check in area and a separate immigration channel.
|
This T3 stuff is all nonsense! As if an international airport would lose a termial! Wake up!!
|
Terminal 1/3 as they are now at one time were called 1a and 1b but was changed as people found it confusing.
Then to change it back would seem stupid. |
They should keep it as T3 and like Vuelo says, why would MAN want to lose 3 terminal status. It sounds stupid, but 3 terminals sounds better than 2!!!
|
bmi are in the frame to move baby operations from terminal 1 to terminal 3 and currently looking at A330 long haul as well.
|
I really cant see BA putting up with sharing 'their' terminal with a major competitors budget arm!! Believe it when I see it...
|
I really cant see BA putting up with sharing 'their' terminal with a major competitors budget arm!! Believe it when I see it... One problem for there long haul could be the fact T3 only has 2 stands that will fit A330's on all the others will only fit up to 767's on. |
Obvious BA never wanted anything more than European services then
G-I-B |
Re: T3 BA
I think you will find that the whole point of giving T3 over to BA was for BA to expand their long-haul ops from Manchester - which has not happened. So now that BA mainline is contracting its european network from Man in favour of european Sun destin -ations and the 'deal' is up its fair game for those that need the space to move into. We might be moving to a situation where BA is no- longer the 'Sacred Cow' at Manchester. It is at LHR and will continue to be ie:T5 MM |
So now that BA mainline is contracting its european network from Man |
Railgun
You see BAcx - I see BA. MM |
BMI, AA and BA just wont all fit at T3....
BA JFK, AA BOS, AA ORD, BD ORD, BD BGI/LAS/UVF = needs more stands than there are at T3! |
There are many more than 5 stands on T3....... :rolleyes:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:59. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.