Airship order from Air Nostrum
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airship order from Air Nostrum
Spanish airline Air Nostrum reserves 10 Airlander airships from Bedford-based firm https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-618115
All seems somewhat strange, what sort of speed will they be travelling at?
HAV said Airlander 10 will cut flight emissions by up to 90% for journeys across Air Nostrum's regional routes in Spain.
The airships, which stay aloft using helium and electricity, have been commissioned to seat 100 people.
HAV (hybridairvehicles.com)
Spanish airline Air Nostrum reserves 10 Airlander airships from Bedford-based firm https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-618115
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can see a long range freight market use for airships but not for a passenger scheduled service operating domestically in Spain. For starters they would need different handling and would be not be able to use a conventional aircraft stand. Then there are wind speed limits and boarding issues. Seems more like an April fool joke yet it is true.
Last edited by LTNman; 16th Jun 2022 at 07:06.
Read up on "Cargolifter" and you will know how this might end.
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: .
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"These qualities will make it an attractive option for different types and conditions of operation, including movements in towns without airport facilities and on islands." - https://www.aviacionline.com/2022/06...-airlander-10/
Does sound like they wouldn't be operating them to conventional airports. Top speed of 130kph - that could make some of the flight times in Spain very long........
Does sound like they wouldn't be operating them to conventional airports. Top speed of 130kph - that could make some of the flight times in Spain very long........
Last edited by cavokblues; 16th Jun 2022 at 09:41.
"These qualities will make it an attractive option for different types and conditions of operation, including movements in towns without airport facilities and on islands." - https://www.aviacionline.com/2022/06...-airlander-10/
Does sound like they wouldn't be operating them to conventional airports. Top speed of 130kph - that could make some of the flight times in Spain very long........
Does sound like they wouldn't be operating them to conventional airports. Top speed of 130kph - that could make some of the flight times in Spain very long........
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 43
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This might not be as ridiculous as it sounds if it were utilised for the Balearic operation. You’d be looking at an hour give or take for Palma-Ibiza and Mahon, about 1:30 for Ibiza-Alicante and Valencia, about 1:40 for Palma-Barcelona, 2 hours for Mahon-Barcelona. All much faster than the ferry and adding probably only 20 mins or so the the block times of the intra-island routes. Ibiza-Mahon is longish but this doesn’t seem to be an existing route.
We used an Airship Industries 600 to provide an airborne camera for a televised cricket match from Lords many moons ago.
It was a lovely machine, very pleasant to fly in and powered by Porsche flat six car engines that sounded very nice, and with ducted fan pods. It took about 40 mins to get overhead Lords from Cambridgeshire but about 2 hours to get back, against headwinds.
And it required a large ground crew of about 10 people and a mobile anchoring mast vehicle in order to take-off and land. I can't see how airships will give a commercial return.
It was a lovely machine, very pleasant to fly in and powered by Porsche flat six car engines that sounded very nice, and with ducted fan pods. It took about 40 mins to get overhead Lords from Cambridgeshire but about 2 hours to get back, against headwinds.
And it required a large ground crew of about 10 people and a mobile anchoring mast vehicle in order to take-off and land. I can't see how airships will give a commercial return.
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember both incidents; I think one was in flight, and the other whilst moored/parked/tethered.
My point was that a great many aircraft which have suffered incidents/accidents during development have gone on to quite successful careers after they've "sorted the problems".
Google HP Victor, DH Comet, Bristol Britannia, BAC 1-11, DH110/Sea Vixen, F-14, B-17, B-47, and so on. Many of these suffered early development problems which had significantly greater expenditure of energy and consequent personal impact on the individuals concerned than did the Airlander incidents.
My point was that a great many aircraft which have suffered incidents/accidents during development have gone on to quite successful careers after they've "sorted the problems".
Google HP Victor, DH Comet, Bristol Britannia, BAC 1-11, DH110/Sea Vixen, F-14, B-17, B-47, and so on. Many of these suffered early development problems which had significantly greater expenditure of energy and consequent personal impact on the individuals concerned than did the Airlander incidents.
Is one allowed to wish them luck, and hope that the business takes off in proof of concept?
Sometimes the opinions sound stronger than the winds.
Sometimes the opinions sound stronger than the winds.
I agree - think this will be more about competing with intra-island ferry routes than it is about conventional air services and the associated infrastructure
"Google HP Victor, DH Comet, Bristol Britannia, BAC 1-11, DH110/Sea Vixen, F-14, B-17, B-47, and so on. Many of these suffered early development problems"
Yes but at the same time there were thousands, tens of thousands, of other aircraft flying OK - the development problems were with one design.
There aren't any other fleets of airships around. The problems seem to be systemic looking back over 120 years - they're a dead end for almost all commercial uses
Yes but at the same time there were thousands, tens of thousands, of other aircraft flying OK - the development problems were with one design.
There aren't any other fleets of airships around. The problems seem to be systemic looking back over 120 years - they're a dead end for almost all commercial uses
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Solihull
Age: 38
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With 5 days aloft time, i could see a lucrative role as an alternative to (very polluting) cruises. We could see one of these pottering around the Nordic Fjords, for example. Beyond that, there is an increasingly popular slow travel movement - for example people choosing ever more to travel by coach than by train. Going by airship instead of by jet will have a heap of positives that may very well outweigh the negatives (speed).
And if it doesn't a large concrete expanse to land (i.e. a traditional airport) - that's a good thing too. Any reasonably accessible field (I can think of 3 or 4 locations within 3 miles of my desk) is suddenly a potential journey start point.
That's not to say that i think this idea will work or that these airships will ever be delivered. But I'm not sure I agree with some (most?) of the negativity above!
And if it doesn't a large concrete expanse to land (i.e. a traditional airport) - that's a good thing too. Any reasonably accessible field (I can think of 3 or 4 locations within 3 miles of my desk) is suddenly a potential journey start point.
That's not to say that i think this idea will work or that these airships will ever be delivered. But I'm not sure I agree with some (most?) of the negativity above!
