Luton-10
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Between the check-in desks
Posts: 445
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The rumour was that the aircraft contained around a thousand illegal migrants hidden in containers. Personally I doubt that is true. The other rumour was that the aircraft was carrying a consignment of dates for the Christmas market but then again that could be incorrect.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the ad hoc charter market the aircraft will go to the airport the charterer wants subject, of course, to operational requirements and slot availability. Egyptair Cargo are fairly regular visitors at Stansted.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, yes, it was a new store which opened recently in Houghton Regis, just rag a bell!
I don't have any knowledge of the cargo, it was just a wild guess!
I don't have any knowledge of the cargo, it was just a wild guess!
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 43
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Egyptair are quite common in the UK and we receive a lot of Egyptian produce, have done for years. I’d suggest with Christmas fast approaching supermarkets are beefing up efforts to avoid empty shelves - Asda were in the news just a few days ago for massive investment into Christmas.
Moronic comments on migrants from an evidently moronic poster have no place
Moronic comments on migrants from an evidently moronic poster have no place
According to Luton Airport post on FB...........Congratulations to EGYPTAIR on their inaugural cargo flight from Cairo, packed with fresh produce for supermarkets across the region.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paxing All Over The World
It is MOST important that every stretch of newly laid asphalt or concrete should have holes dug into it as SOON as possible ...
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the airport dug once they would have had enough money for a 5 star terminal. So how many drop off zones has the airport had? This one lasted around 2 years before it was moved and then moved again. The site is now the Dart station.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bim not happy
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-...herts-59635009
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-...herts-59635009
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even ardent airport supports would secretly admit that there is something corrupt and decidedly dodgy when the airport owner gets to approve the airport operators planning application. This is reinforced by comments from the chairwoman of LRT that the community including the planning committee will financially benefit if the application was approved. Bim just shares the views of those that the council ignores.
Meanwhile the airport car parks are all but empty again. Time for another council bailout to not only its own airport company but to the shareholders of the airport operator?
Meanwhile the airport car parks are all but empty again. Time for another council bailout to not only its own airport company but to the shareholders of the airport operator?
Even ardent airport supports would secretly admit that there is something corrupt and decidedly dodgy when the airport owner gets to approve the airport operators planning application. This is reinforced by comments from the chairwoman of LRT that the community including the planning committee will financially benefit if the application was approved. Bim just shares the views of those that the council ignores.
Meanwhile the airport car parks are all but empty again. Time for another council bailout to not only its own airport company but to the shareholders of the airport operator?
Meanwhile the airport car parks are all but empty again. Time for another council bailout to not only its own airport company but to the shareholders of the airport operator?
Bim knows what he's doing here. The Tories like to blame Labour for 'politicking' for his local constituents but he knows full well there is no mechanism here for calling the application here..."The government has the power to "call in" planning applications that local authorities approve, and make the ultimate decision. This usually happens in cases where the decision may have wider effects beyond the immediate locality or potentially conflict with national policy."
This scheme doesn't meet that criteria. There is no significant infrastructure change or discernible increase in traffic. Many aircraft are being up-gauged and would result only in an additional 15 flights on average per day (around 1 flight per hour, although there is very little capacity to add more at peak times anyway).
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never said anything that has taken place is illegal but that doesn’t mean it is not corrupt or dodgy in the eyes of the public, which means the application requires independent scrutiny. My next prediction after getting the vote spot on with 7 votes to 2 is that the decision will not be called in.
Interesting point made by Dannyboy 39 about an extra 15 flights a day. The airport operator claimed at that planning meeting that there will be only an extra 3 flights a day with larger aircraft taking the additional passengers.
Interesting point made by Dannyboy 39 about an extra 15 flights a day. The airport operator claimed at that planning meeting that there will be only an extra 3 flights a day with larger aircraft taking the additional passengers.
Last edited by LTNman; 15th Dec 2021 at 11:57.
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: .
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The airport operator claimed at that meeting that there will be only an extra 3 flights a day with larger aircraft taking the additional passengers
It's remarkable how that wasn't challenged either at the meeting or by the press afterwards. Basic maths to expose the larger aircraft myth - 1,000,000 passengers / (3 flights*365) suggests these larger aircraft need to be taking 304 passengers each.
Anyone with any understanding whatsoever of Luton airport's operations and future knows it is incredibly disingenuous of the airport to suggest that would be the case.
It's remarkable how that wasn't challenged either at the meeting or by the press afterwards. Basic maths to expose the larger aircraft myth - 1,000,000 passengers / (3 flights*365) suggests these larger aircraft need to be taking 304 passengers each.
Anyone with any understanding whatsoever of Luton airport's operations and future knows it is incredibly disingenuous of the airport to suggest that would be the case.
The airport operator claimed at that meeting that there will be only an extra 3 flights a day with larger aircraft taking the additional passengers
It's remarkable how that wasn't challenged either at the meeting or by the press afterwards. Basic maths to expose the larger aircraft myth - 1,000,000 passengers / (3 flights*365) suggests these larger aircraft need to be taking 304 passengers each.
Anyone with any understanding whatsoever of Luton airport's operations and future knows it is incredibly disingenuous of the airport to suggest that would be the case.
It's remarkable how that wasn't challenged either at the meeting or by the press afterwards. Basic maths to expose the larger aircraft myth - 1,000,000 passengers / (3 flights*365) suggests these larger aircraft need to be taking 304 passengers each.
Anyone with any understanding whatsoever of Luton airport's operations and future knows it is incredibly disingenuous of the airport to suggest that would be the case.