Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Teesside-2

Old 15th Jan 2023, 14:41
  #1761 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So we should ignore articles by accredited journalists who you have concluded dont share your political views then? I understand now.
Grumpy1 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 14:55
  #1762 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If his articles weren't all one sided then I'd take notice. But since they are all attacking the Tories then it is hard to see credibility, as he won't do any articles about Labour whatsoever even if Labour stuff are far far more shocking he won't do an article. He calls himself unbiased but yet shows real bias.

There is another local journalistic page that shows no bias whatsoever and goes after all manner of issues no matter what political alligence. So have real credibility.
Harold77 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:09
  #1763 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,522
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
The usual approach on Pprune is to play the ball not the man.

I've not seen any of the issues raised in TVM tackled on a point by point basis, just the blanket "oh it's biased" response followed by classic "whataboutery".

What's the other site you are referring to?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:30
  #1764 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: London
Posts: 419
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread, unfortunately, seems to now be more about scoring political points than about the airport with most contributors seeming to want its closure......very sad indeed.
Jamesair1 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:34
  #1765 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,522
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Jamesair1
This thread, unfortunately, seems to now be more about scoring political points than about the airport with most contributors seeming to want its closure......very sad indeed.
Really? You can see criticism of the way it is run, but I don't think any of the regular contributors want it closed. To say 'most' isn't sensible
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:40
  #1766 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 43
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If someone is having a pop at a Private Eye article or the person who cited such an article it suggests the bias problem is their own and the truth is inconvenient to their own agenda. Just because a Labour activist highlights something, doesn’t mean it isn’t true. There’s plenty of reporting on Labour (and other parties) anyway, especially in the Rotten Borough section.
AirportPlanner1 is online now  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:45
  #1767 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Private Eye frequently and often criticise the Labour politicians. Never heard anybody seriously suggest that PE are left wingers but guess making this allegation is a way of avoiding the subject.
If the airports principal benefactor becomes the subject of criticism and ridicule it will reflect on the airport so if you support the airport the allegations need to be addressed.
Grumpy1 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:50
  #1768 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: London
Posts: 419
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just the way it looks to me.........lately, I've seen nothing else but basically, ......"what a waste of resources...which could be better spent elswhere". I sincerely hope I'm misreading things.
Jamesair1 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:51
  #1769 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 35
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Problem with armchair experts is they think they can see the full picture, when in reality they're lucky if they can see 50%. If the airport was being run badly you would see changes being made at the top. People declare it as being run badly because it's not achieving what they think it should be achieving in an unrealistically truncated timeframe.
Cautious Optimist is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:55
  #1770 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,522
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
So you have a greater overview do you, CO? Don't think it's unreasonable for folks to be able to express an opinion.

If the airport was being run badly you would see changes being made at the top.
Is this you confirming that this is why Stobart left?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 15:57
  #1771 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never said Private Eye is biased. I said the source of the aricle (TVM) is biased. Take a look at the TVM site and you won't find a single story about Labour, he won't dish the dirt on Labour like he is doing with the Tories. Hence my bias claim.

As for me, I'm a political neutral.
Harold77 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 16:02
  #1772 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,522
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Harold77
I never said Private Eye is biased. I said the source of the aricle (TVM) is biased. Take a look at the TVM site and you won't find a single story about Labour, he won't dish the dirt on Labour like he is doing with the Tories. Hence my bias claim.

As for me, I'm a political neutral.
But to repeat my previous comments - whether TVM is biased or not, nobody has refuted the points that have been made. There's an easy way to shut him up, prove him wrong.
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 16:06
  #1773 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But Harold, the critical article is in Private Eye and was presumably vetted and approved by their lawyers. You are the one who introduced TVM, possibly as a deflection tactic?
Grumpy1 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 16:12
  #1774 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 35
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
So you have a greater overview do you, CO? Don't think it's unreasonable for folks to be able to express an opinion.
At risk of becoming arrogant, certainly more than most on here but still not privy to the big picture by a long shot. The problem with opinion is too much of it is uneducated.
Cautious Optimist is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 16:17
  #1775 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jamesair1
Just the way it looks to me.........lately, I've seen nothing else but basically, ......"what a waste of resources...which could be better spent elswhere". I sincerely hope I'm misreading things.
I'm sick of them sort of comments as well. Some can only see the short term, not the long term outcomes.
Some just see the headline results after year end and don't even read the context of the outcomes.

Harold77 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 16:23
  #1776 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grumpy1
But Harold, the critical article is in Private Eye and was presumably vetted and approved by their lawyers. You are the one who introduced TVM, possibly as a deflection tactic?
I said it was literally word for word copy of TVM article. Not a deflection tactic.

Had to laugh when it says the company has no experience in running ports, just further in the article contradicts themselves by saying the company was the owners of docks/ quays in the area.
Harold77 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 17:13
  #1777 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,522
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Harold77
I said it was literally word for word copy of TVM article. Not a deflection tactic.

Had to laugh when it says the company has no experience in running ports, just further in the article contradicts themselves by saying the company was the owners of docks/ quays in the area.
If you're referring to the article "Rich Tees" in the current edition of Private Eye, I'd suggest you go and read it again.

Also, TVM and Private Eye are covering similar subjects, so there's bound to be some crossover, but their articles are certainly not a word for word copy. Not seen any rebuttals to the points raised.
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2023, 17:53
  #1778 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 666
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting a bit heated guys!


The facts are.this airport, apart from a brief bonanza period of passenger throughput, but at not much profit..has struggled.

Departure board tells the story(yes other interests are now there)..”Aberdeen,Amsterdam and Alicante !

Too many airports chasing too few passengers.

A lot of money..local tax payers, government hand outs whatever…get real in the modern world ..people are genuinely struggling out there and not just here.but nationwide..investment could be better spent..HS2 anyone?

Sorry for rant!
highwideandugly is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2023, 10:26
  #1779 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Age: 73
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking to an airport worker today.

Word at the airport is that the man who likes to give his friends land and contracts, has discussed what it posted on PPrune. Rumour has it he posts, and asks the minions to post as well.

Private Eye know a thing or two when it comes to what can be printed. Any news on what the friends private company are planning for the rest of the south side land?
Beafer is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2023, 10:53
  #1780 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by highwideandugly
Getting a bit heated guys!


The facts are.this airport, apart from a brief bonanza period of passenger throughput, but at not much profit..has struggled.

Departure board tells the story(yes other interests are now there)..”Aberdeen,Amsterdam and Alicante !

Too many airports chasing too few passengers.

A lot of money..local tax payers, government hand outs whatever…get real in the modern world ..people are genuinely struggling out there and not just here.but nationwide..investment could be better spent..HS2 anyone?

Sorry for rant!
Where do you think the money is going if not on jobs and contracts. Alot of aviation related jobs tend to better paid than the average.
Money spent on the airport is not just for a few passenger flights but is keeping well paid jobs with the likes of Draken, hopefully T2 and so much more.
It is also for the Tees Valley area not the wider North East.
The ultimate scrutiny is at the next mayoral election.
Don't forget that some of the money will have been given by central government for the airport specifically ie they put a bid in for the money, Not just for anything the Mayoral office sees fit and as such less money may of been given overall to the area, supporting less jobs!
onion is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.