Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Teesside-2

Old 22nd Jan 2021, 11:46
  #181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nowhere I'll be found
Age: 41
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps someone could clear up the confusion for me, seems the implication is the article is somehow fraudulent on the part of Eastern, yet it's every bit as much the Mayors article so is someone impersonating him to?!
No-More-Bullschit is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2021, 12:43
  #182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Unfortunately a banger has been lit and dropped in a barrel of bullschit. Think its time to stand back as one doesn't want to get splattered as there's probably more to come up.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2021, 13:47
  #183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that’s what I call an analogy ! Nice one..
highwideandugly is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 19:02
  #184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
December CAA stats:

Terminal passengers: 936 - down 91% v prior year.
  • Aberdeen: 563
  • Belfast City: 110
  • London Heathrow: 192
Plus charter
  • Cardiff: 71
I reckon this makes the loads on the flights as follows:
  • Aberdeen: 12.8 pax per flight in December (11.8 in Nov, 10.4 in Oct, 11.8 in Sep, 8.8 in Aug & 6.3 in Jul)
  • Belfast City: 9.2 in Dec (13.5 in Nov, 5.0 in Oct, 9.0 in Sep, 9.7 in Aug & 10.4 in Jul)
  • London Heathrow: 10.7 in Dec (5.7 in Nov, 6.3 in Oct, 12.5 in Sep - LCY was 4.1 in August & 5.8 in Jul)
tigertanaka is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 20:09
  #185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: England, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting increase in Heathrow figures, and that's without the collateral boost the Loganair announcement would have provided
Robert-Ryan is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 20:12
  #186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I read that LNER are to introduce a direct train to London from Middlesborough, might affect the MME-LHR flight a wee bit
GrahamK is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2021, 22:17
  #187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
A slow train journey with no electric trains.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2021, 10:32
  #188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,523
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Where's the money for the upgrade coming from?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2021, 11:04
  #189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Chancellor who lives in N. York’s seems very keen on a de- centralised Government with the various departments moving up to the Northeast which can only be a good thing for fast travel between London and the Boro. Until the people in London realise what a beautiful area North Yorkshire is then I suppose the ‘London Staff’ will want to commute until they move their families depending on their children’s schooling requirements. Heads of Department will of course fly from Teesside, the also ran will have to take the train.
tramontana is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2021, 12:28
  #190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tees Valley, UK
Age: 32
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
£12.5m from the government and £22.5m from the TVCA
s_insania is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 11:26
  #191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Durham
Age: 79
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Using the train just to go to London only would probably be the best, however connecting to an international flight at LHR would be easier and quicker using Loganair.
oldart is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 12:39
  #192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,523
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Heads of Department will of course fly from Teesside, the also ran will have to take the train.
Are senior civil servants allowed to fly on domestic routes when there is a more environmentally friendly, practical alternative?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 13:55
  #193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure of the policy but I am sure that practicalities and timescales come into it. Not to mention that there will be plenty of consultants, advisors and other corporate travellers who will not fall under the civil service policy if part of the treasury were to relocate to Teesside.

If you were travelling by train to Westminster from an office near Teesside airport I guess your timings would be something like: leave the office 30 minutes before the train leaves Darlington, hopefully 2 hours 30 mins on the train then 30 minutes tube/taxi to your destination (so 3 hours 30 mins total).

If you take the plane then you would leave the office an hour before departure, 1 hour flight then 1 hour Heathrow Express/Tube or Taxi (so 3 hours total). In that example the train wins despite (taking 30 minutes longer) on environmental grounds, ability to work whilst travelling and flexibility due to sheer number of trains between Darlington, Eaglescliffe (and soon Middlesbrough).

But if you are going to Slough, the dynamic totally changes. The train will be something like 4 hours door to door and the flight 2 hours 30.

Of course price can also come into it. An early train to London is generally not so cheap if you are booking under a week in advance.
tigertanaka is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 14:49
  #194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now I’m sure we have had these discussions in past times!

At the end of the day...it’s Covid time so nobody really knows anything?

Airports and airlines will fail,trains will will run on slippy leaves and Boro won’t be promoted!!

Stay safe...
highwideandugly is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 15:05
  #195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
The focus of HM Treasury is the UK.
Branch offices of UK plc outside the UK are handled by the Foreign Office or MOD

I imagine there would be a lot of traffic between Westminster and a Treasury office in Teesside. Maybe there would be traffic from Teesside to other HM Treasury locations in Norwich and Edinburgh

I am not clear why there would need to be heavy traffic between a Teesside office and Slough or Heathrow.

Last edited by davidjohnson6; 31st Jan 2021 at 15:19.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 16:36
  #196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 195 comment is really an interim measure until such times as the London Staff decide either to move up here or leave/take early retirement then the cheaper (no London Weighting) locally employed Staff will be moved in as I am sure they will be able to shuffle paper around just as efficiently as the former London Staff did.
Unless the London Staff are dyed in the wool Cockneys then the advantages of moving Up North are obvious, a superb area to live in if you love country matters or the seaside, sell their pokey two bedroomed ex Council London flat and by a Detached house in Ingleby Toytown, decent Yorkshire puddings instead of jellied eels, my only worry is that I would not like to hear the Cockney infiltrate our Yorkshire dialect tha nas.
A bit below the belt in regards to Boro’s promotion prospects mind you I haven’t seen the Boro play since Delaphena and Ugalini (spelling?) played for them.
Covid has indeed put the mockers on most future plans but we do have hope for the future with both the Chancellor and the Mayors backing.

Last edited by tramontana; 31st Jan 2021 at 17:10.
tramontana is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 17:08
  #197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
davidjohnson6

I agree but at the same time if I were a treasury employee who lived in Slough, I would be pushing heavily to use the plane for my hypothetic trip to Teesside. In my experience these polices have some degree of interpretation based on individual circumstances, the time the employee leaves/gets home, avoiding overnight stays, travelling with more senior colleagues...
tigertanaka is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 18:11
  #198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,523
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Treasury? Degree of interpretation on expenses?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 19:26
  #199 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Teesside, UK
Age: 33
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the middle of all of this wonderful chat about hypothetical scenarios - I seriously hope we do get the Treasury outpost of course! - it should be noted that Loganair’s second tenure starts tomorrow with the first flight to Aberdeen at 1500. The aircraft is due in about an hour beforehand, first of two of course!
mmeteesside is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2021, 19:58
  #200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two at the same time..15 passengers shared?
highwideandugly is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.