Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Flybe-V1

Old 24th Nov 2020, 15:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Snr
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe-V1

"On the evening of 3 March 2020, the directors of Flybe were informed by Virgin that, as a result of the adverse impact of COVID-19 coronavirus on its own bookings, it was no longer able to provide further funding to Connect or Flybe."

Thank you to Sandy78 for pointing out the document. I stand by my original comment. 24 hours prior to the collapse, Virgin pulled out of providing any additional funding, which had been agreed back in January. There were many reasons Flybe/Connect failed, but the final nail in the coffin was Virgin (rightly) choosing mainline over the "subsidiary".
Snr is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2020, 08:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Doncaster
Age: 48
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is confusing. I think it would not be wrong to say Flybe was not in a good state in December. It had hope from the new ownership structure, but it was not out of the woods.

Covid then came along and I do recall press releases about booking falling off a cliff. On top of that the new owners bookings were presumably seeing a similar pattern and it would have been only a matter of time before they had to prioritise funding their mainline airline survival.

Whether it was Virgin or one of the other investors it was going to happen. The investors did not put the final nail in the coffin. Covid did.
davidjpowell is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2020, 23:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Rome
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what will happen to the former Flybe MPL cadets?
robby239 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2020, 09:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: London
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not only caused by Covid, as soon as the general public gets a hint of an airline in trouble (and their money being lost), the speculation rapidly turns into a fact with forward bookings grinding to a shuddering halt.
Jamesair1 is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2020, 22:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Today's update

Flybe's return to the skies moves a step closer
Cyrus Capital applies for operating licence for the airline and pledges to 'restore essential regional connectivity
fjencl is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 16:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waters edge
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and a step further away perhaps with the BACF announcement today re Southampton routes..
Flitefone is online now  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 16:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: 41000ft
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure - BACF's announcement is very much just a weekend summer operation only. I, personally, would be surprised if Flybe is back in the skies by when the flights end next October....! Never say never...
cavokblues is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2020, 16:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe as Cyrus now owns the name they have requested the change before they relaunch
HH6702 is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2020, 09:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So debts or liabilities basically total GBP427m

How on earth is this going to work?
shamrock7seal is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2020, 13:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I'm not mistaken, the debts remain with the original business and therefore probably aren't picked up by the new company, Thyme OpCo.
JobsaGoodun is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2021, 09:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North of the M4
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-10693875
This damage. I remember him boasting about the 5Bn bit. Shortly after that he invited Digby Jones onto the board.
biddedout is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2021, 07:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 42
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
£65 EXT-LCY doesn’t sound too bad at all to me, given it was up against the peak train it should actually have been more. £30 is unrealistic and EZY on a route like that is fantasy. Perhaps a good assessment then of the overall faults.
AirportPlanner1 is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2021, 11:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are we likely to see this year 2021 the opening up of flybe2 .......
fjencl is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2021, 12:20
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: 41000ft
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by airsouthwest View Post
Flybe should have scaled back and offloaded the E195s faster
To be fair I think they tried everything to rid themselves of those aircraft but they were tied in to those contracts and concluded it was better to fly them and at least try and make some money for them, rather than having them sat on the ground.

Like every airline failure the company had bad decision compounded by bad decision over several years. They just had too many aircraft and no control over the size of their fleet.
cavokblues is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2021, 12:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by airsouthwest View Post
Flybe should have really taken some inspiration from Porter Airlines who seem to have a fairly strong business. Instead they tried to be a business airline, ski airline, a charter airline and a tourist airline along with a low cost airline to match Easyjet/Ryanair
Porter has also expandend into leisure/ski/tourist markets - I am not really sure this really is the difference between the two.
virginblue is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2021, 15:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: 41000ft
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Flybe did, to a degree, have a similar strategy to Porter with their operations out of City airport, where did they quite well.

They were obviously a much larger airline than Porter. Their problem was a lot of their trunk routes elsewhere didn't make much money. And if they did they were always in danger of a easyJet or Ryanair coming along, with a much lower cost base, and stealing their market.

With the right fleet selection, and free or ridiculous lease agreements, there probably is a bit of money to be made replicating a bit of Flybe's old route network. It's just never going to be a huge money spinner IMO.
cavokblues is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2021, 15:20
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BMA
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
virginblue

Porter are more like BA Cityflyer. They seem to target slightly higher end tourist markets in the downtime on their business routes and they offer an onboard service and a more premium approach.

FlyBe on the other hand tried to be everything to everyone - a business airline, a cheap airline, a holiday airline and obviously failed at that. I still think FlyBe missed so many opportunities. It started flying from LCY and went up against BA on the routes rather than operating other routes - there is a gap for services to smaller Scandinavian cities, French towns for second home owners (similar to where they flew from SOU).
BA318 is online now  
Old 11th Jan 2021, 18:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dorset
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Flybe did, to a degree, have a similar strategy to Porter with their operations out of City airport, where did they quite well
Flybe's operations at LCY, and the LHR services, were an utter calamity. I am not sure where you get the idea that they "did quite well" but they did not. BHD was the only route at LCY which was any good and that only did OK because of an overall deal on airport charges that forced Flybe to fly lots of other LCY routes to generate volume. The rest and particularly EDI-LCY were complete basketcases. If Flybe 2 want to replicate Flybe 1, I hope they have deep pockets.
Albert Hall is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2021, 09:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But FlyBe were never set up as a low cost airline, the routes they appear to have done best on were those where they weren't competing with a low cost carrier, or were in code share agreements with.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2021, 09:15
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: 41000ft
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Albert Hall View Post
Flybe's operations at LCY, and the LHR services, were an utter calamity. I am not sure where you get the idea that they "did quite well" but they did not.
Fair point, mine was purely anecdotal and I assumed because the Edinburgh, Exeter, Amsterdam routes had been there for 6 years or so they must have been making some money on them, but not sure that's even true with Flybe. I recall reading something that when Saad came in 59% of their routes were loss making!
cavokblues is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.