Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

TUI Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Feb 2019, 19:27
  #461 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: España
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Report on Aviation Herald suggests a replacement engine was flown to Chania from Brussels on Tuesday
FFHKG is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 23:33
  #462 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAX Registrations

It appears there will be no G-TUME or G-TUMI. Anyone know why?
ROC10 is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 23:55
  #463 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ROC10
It appears there will be no G-TUME or G-TUMI. Anyone know why?
This will depend. They might not like the sound of G-TUME, or G-TUMI. Airlines don’t use every letter for aircraft registration, mainly the letter Q, TUI haven’t used G-FDZI either and Other airlines are the same. It depends what they like or want.
Jet2_GLA is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2019, 00:20
  #464 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet2_GLA

This will depend. They might not like the sound of G-TUME, or G-TUMI. Airlines don’t use every letter for aircraft registration, mainly the letter Q, TUI haven’t used G-FDZI either and Other airlines are the same. It depends what they like or want.
I know that G-TAWE wasn’t used as it was the registration of a former, I believe destroyed, aircraft.
G-FDZI (along with others in the FDZ series) were not used due to conflict with the old CDZ series. There was a G-CDZI so FDZI wasn’t used as the last three letters would be the same. There has also been a G-TAWI and G-TUII as well as G-FDZE/G-OOBE/G-TUIE so nothing to do with these letters specifically.

i can’t see any obvious reason why G-TUME or G-TUMI would be inappropriate compared to the obvious G-TAWT which was never used. It seems silly not to use all possible registrations as they will sooner need a new prefix other than TUM- but I guess they must have their reasons...
ROC10 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2019, 04:12
  #465 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 965
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The LBA for example allow Q however UK CAA do not. They also charge you extra for going out of sequence despite the fact it’s not possible to go from P to Q.
Dannyboy39 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2019, 00:26
  #466 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They may not have used G- FDZI because they sent the bird in question to Britannia Nordic as SE-DZI and when it returned to UK became G-CDZI.
Rutan16 is online now  
Old 10th Feb 2019, 00:36
  #467 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: The White House
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe Tumi the luggage company has it registered already ? Not sure on TUME.
DonTrumpet2020 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2019, 19:13
  #468 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Manchester
Age: 45
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAN-RHO S19

Looking for type info for:

TOM2658 day 6 MAN-RHO 22Jun19..

Last year it was operated as B767/757 so what about this year?

Matjr79
matjr79 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2019, 19:37
  #469 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Scotland
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DonTrumpet2020
Maybe Tumi the luggage company has it registered already ? Not sure on TUME.
G-INFO says that neither of the registrations have been used.
mullac30 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2019, 09:02
  #470 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 846
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by matjr79
Looking for type info for:

TOM2658 day 6 MAN-RHO 22Jun19..

Last year it was operated as B767/757 so what about this year?

Matjr79
First flight of the season series in April showing as 757
edit and so is 22 June
rog747 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2019, 16:37
  #471 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I surely can’t be the only one who finds this odd...

G-FDZR doing LGW-TFS-BOH today whilst G-TAWW doing BOH-TFS-LGW. Seems like a regular down-route swap, however it seems silly since the BOH aircraft is shcheduled to position to LGW tonight at 20:00 as it does every Friday. Surely this swap could’ve just been done by G-TAWW flying BOH-LGW tonight and then G-FDZR flying LGW-BOH tomorrow night, or am I missing something? What’s more, the swapping seems to have further delayed what were already slightly delayed flights.
ROC10 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2019, 16:42
  #472 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps it has actually been done to avoid the empty positioning sector later this evening? Makes more more sense and happens regularly with all airlines at out-stations as i'm sure you're already aware.
Cazza_fly is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2019, 17:09
  #473 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cazza_fly
Perhaps it has actually been done to avoid the empty positioning sector later this evening? Makes more more sense and happens regularly with all airlines at out-stations as i'm sure you're already aware.
It won’t avoid it though. My point was that FDZR will arrive back to BOH only for it to position to LGW for Saturday ski flights as it is scheduled to do. That’s why I can’t see the logic.
ROC10 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2019, 17:42
  #474 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ROC10


It won’t avoid it though. My point was that FDZR will arrive back to BOH only for it to position to LGW for Saturday ski flights as it is scheduled to do. That’s why I can’t see the logic.
Ah i see, apologies. Well that does indeed seem a little pointless. The TUI planning department must however see otherwise. I'm more surprised that TUI need to be positioning an empty 737 across from BOH to LGW during the winter.
Cazza_fly is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2019, 17:54
  #475 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cazza_fly
Ah i see, apologies. Well that does indeed seem a little pointless. The TUI planning department must however see otherwise. I'm more surprised that TUI need to be positioning an empty 737 across from BOH to LGW during the winter.
I also found that quite surprising but I guess they need the capacity at LGW and lack of ski flights from BOH. It’s probably their shortest scheduled positioning flight this winter. There are quite a few each week including EDI-ABZ, ABZ-NWI (can be almost an hour long!), NWI-DUB and DUB-EDI, as well as the several 787 ones.
ROC10 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2019, 23:57
  #476 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ROC10
I surely can’t be the only one who finds this odd...

G-FDZR doing LGW-TFS-BOH today whilst G-TAWW doing BOH-TFS-LGW. Seems like a regular down-route swap, however it seems silly since the BOH aircraft is shcheduled to position to LGW tonight at 20:00 as it does every Friday. Surely this swap could’ve just been done by G-TAWW flying BOH-LGW tonight and then G-FDZR flying LGW-BOH tomorrow night, or am I missing something? What’s more, the swapping seems to have further delayed what were already slightly delayed flights.
I would think its to do with crewing, the Gatwick crew will fly on the same aircraft, in this case G-FDZR, LGW-TFS-BOH-LGW so they start their duty at LGW and finish it at LGW, however does mean the BOH crew flew on G-TAWW, BOH-TFS-LGW, maybe this crew is then need at LGW at the weekend, and will then bring the aircraft back to BOH again?
Matt995 is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2019, 06:27
  #477 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking the same the Gatwick crew dont swap aircraft they simply fly to BOH then ferry to LGW later.
LiamNCL is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2019, 22:26
  #478 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,712
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
If FR24 is to be believed there's currently a 757 (G-OOBC) routing SFB-BHX as TOM935.

FR24's flight history suggests that yesterday it routed RAK-TER-SFB.

Interested to learn what's behind that unusual routing?
Wycombe is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2019, 22:41
  #479 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: At the bar
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the TCS World Travel luxury around-the-world trips, for which TUI provide a kitted out 80 seater 757 for.

Originally Posted by Wycombe
If FR24 is to be believed there's currently a 757 (G-OOBC) routing SFB-BHX as TOM935.

FR24's flight history suggests that yesterday it routed RAK-TER-SFB.

Interested to learn what's behind that unusual routing?
ImPlaneCrazy is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2019, 10:50
  #480 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,712
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
"One of the TCS World Travel luxury around-the-world trips, for which TUI provide a kitted out 80 seater 757"
That seems a very odd routing to be part of a RTW itinerary, unless the a/c was positioning to pick up a segment from SFB back to BHX, and needed a tech-stop in the Azores on it's way from Morocco.
Wycombe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.