Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Jet2-5

Old 31st Jul 2020, 14:39
  #2741 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wowzz
If you booked the holiday 12 months ago, you dont really have a choice, unless you are prepared to lose the entire cost of the holiday.
Exactly, there’s been an awful lot of blame placed on customers for “booking during a global pandemic” when many have not done this. To then be told by your airline/holiday company that you are to travel on holiday, only to receive a text/email whilst away informing you that you may or may not have to come home early at short notice is not exactly a particularly good experience. Obviously the airlines are not responsible for the sudden reintroduction of quarantine but they do have a duty of care to their customers, or at least they ought to have if they wish to retain a good reputation. Government advice is not currently to end holidays prematurely, this is very much a commercial decision.
ROC10 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 16:02
  #2742 (permalink)  
Alba Gu Brath
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Merseyside
Age: 55
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ROC10
Government advice is not currently to end holidays prematurely, this is very much a commercial decision.
Government advice is currently "From 27 July, the FCO advise against all non-essential travel to Spain, including the Balearic and Canary Islands, based on the current assessment of COVID-19 risks in the country." Quite how you determine this does not apply to those already in country on vacation I am not sure?
Big Tudor is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 16:07
  #2743 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: This side of Heaven
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a fine distinction. If "the FCO advise against all non-essential travel to Spain" obviously those already in the country are not going to travel there because they are already there!!
Gurnard is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 16:07
  #2744 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,523
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Government advice is currently "From 27 July, the FCO advise against all non-essential travel to Spain, including the Balearic and Canary Islands, based on the current assessment of COVID-19 risks in the country." Quite how you determine this does not apply to those already in country on vacation I am not sure?
Because it says so two paras down?

From 27 July, the FCO advise against all non-essential travel to Spain, including the Balearic and Canary Islands, based on the current assessment of COVID-19 risks in the country.

This advice is based on evidence of increases in cases of COVID-19 in several regions, but particularly in Aragon, Navarra and Catalonia (which include the cities of Zaragoza, Pamplona and Barcelona).

The FCO is not advising those already travelling in Spain to leave at this time. Travellers should follow the advice of the local authorities on how best to protect themselves and others, including any measures that they bring in to control the virus.
https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/spain
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 16:12
  #2745 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
The UK Govt appears to have decided that it doesn't want any more Brits to go on holiday to Spain. Boris / Rishi have seen how much bringing Thomas Cook's customers home cost in Sept 2019. Boris also knows how much hassle was involved bringing everyone home in March 2020 at the start of the lockdown. HM Govt appears to have decided it is not willing to pay to evacuate everyone back to the UK and would rather pax and airlines just sort it out themselves instead
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 17:06
  #2746 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Johnny F@rt Pants
Embrace the new normal.
The phrase new normal needs distanced from otherwise these rules and mask wearing will be in place long after Covid has ceased to be a threat to 3% of the population if everyone is happy to class it as normal.
LiamNCL is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 17:36
  #2747 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Tudor
Government advice is currently "From 27 July, the FCO advise against all non-essential travel to Spain, including the Balearic and Canary Islands, based on the current assessment of COVID-19 risks in the country." Quite how you determine this does not apply to those already in country on vacation I am not sure?
See reply from another poster above
ROC10 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 18:56
  #2748 (permalink)  
Alba Gu Brath
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Merseyside
Age: 55
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ROC10
See reply from another poster above
And my response to Government would be "how you determine this does not apply to those already in country on vacation." It seems positively bizarre to exclude someone from travelling to Spain whilst those who are already there can remain and return as planned? None of this makes sense, and the lack of information on why the decision was taken leads one to believe it was for reasons other than pure spikes in virus cases.
I note TUI have now applied the same dates as Jet2 for Balearics, Canaries & Mainland Spain..
Big Tudor is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 19:36
  #2749 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Tudor
And my response to Government would be "how you determine this does not apply to those already in country on vacation." It seems positively bizarre to exclude someone from travelling to Spain whilst those who are already there can remain and return as planned? None of this makes sense, and the lack of information on why the decision was taken leads one to believe it was for reasons other than pure spikes in virus cases.
I note TUI have now applied the same dates as Jet2 for Balearics, Canaries & Mainland Spain..
Couldn't have put it better myself.
Cazza_fly is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 19:40
  #2750 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,523
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
What would be the benefit of making people come back early? You still have to do 14 day quarantine whenever you come back.
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 20:08
  #2751 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Tudor
And my response to Government would be "how you determine this does not apply to those already in country on vacation." It seems positively bizarre to exclude someone from travelling to Spain whilst those who are already there can remain and return as planned? None of this makes sense, and the lack of information on why the decision was taken leads one to believe it was for reasons other than pure spikes in virus cases.
I note TUI have now applied the same dates as Jet2 for Balearics, Canaries & Mainland Spain..
The government aren’t excluding anyone from travelling to Spain. They have, of course, advised against all but essential travel and implemented a 2-week quarantine, thus, for obvious reasons, package holidays can’t go ahead as planned. What exactly is it that “does not apply” to those already in Spain? They will still have to quarantine on return so what would be the point in bringing them back earlier? Or do you mean that they should be left in Spain until further notice with no flight home? In which case, from a purely epidemiological perspective, that may be understandable but it would be a rather harsh stance.
ROC10 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 22:45
  #2752 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Danunder
Age: 49
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
What would be the benefit of making people come back early? You still have to do 14 day quarantine whenever you come back.
Er, less time spent in a higher risk area means a lower chance of contracting the virus. Not everyone who gets Covid while abroad will simply be okay after 14 days back at home, even if spread to citizens back in the UK is limited by the quarantine.
UnderASouthernSky is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2020, 22:53
  #2753 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Darkest Lincs
Posts: 544
Received 96 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by UnderASouthernSky
Er, less time spent in a higher risk area means a lower chance of contracting the virus. Not everyone who gets Covid while abroad will simply be okay after 14 days back at home, even if spread to citizens back in the UK is limited by the quarantine.
Yes, but places like the Canaries are not a high risk area. So why the need to bring people back from a low risk area to a real high risk area such as Manchester?
wowzz is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2020, 07:05
  #2754 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,523
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
The UK Govt appears to have decided that it doesn't want any more Brits to go on holiday to Spain. Boris / Rishi have seen how much bringing Thomas Cook's customers home cost in Sept 2019. Boris also knows how much hassle was involved bringing everyone home in March 2020 at the start of the lockdown. HM Govt appears to have decided it is not willing to pay to evacuate everyone back to the UK and would rather pax and airlines just sort it out themselves instead
Getting back to Jet2, what they are being criticised for is consolidating return flights, which mainly seems to mean people coming back earlier. So early return flights are available, but people don't want to use them.

What exactly are the government meant to do, send the troops in?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2020, 21:06
  #2755 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: scotland
Posts: 192
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Tudor
And my response to Government would be "how you determine this does not apply to those already in country on vacation." It seems positively bizarre to exclude someone from travelling to Spain whilst those who are already there can remain and return as planned?
Why bizarre ? The obvious alternative was shown to be seriously daft when the first Covid-19 travel restrictions were brought into operation.
What might be sensible is for airlines to arrange to recognise each others tickets.
occasional is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2020, 21:21
  #2756 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by occasional
What might be sensible is for airlines to arrange to recognise each others tickets.
Very unlikely to happen - the penalties for acting as a cartel are very high. If an airline wants to be a monopolist, they will act in secret, not in public
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2020, 11:14
  #2757 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: scotland
Posts: 192
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
To my mind recognising each others tickets during the Covid crisis is a proposal that ought to come from government. It was a system that used to work well on cross-channel ferries.
occasional is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2020, 17:00
  #2758 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by occasional
To my mind recognising each others tickets during the Covid crisis is a proposal that ought to come from government. It was a system that used to work well on cross-channel ferries.
Imagine BA being considerate enough to provide carriage for a Virgin passenger - how long do you think BA would have to wait before Virgin forwarded the due amount?

Imagine how long Jet2 would have to wait for reimbursement from Ryanair if they gave carriage to a Ryanair passenger?

Can you visualise Ryanair paying £100 to TUI to get a Ryanair passenger back from Tenerife (someone who possibly only paid Ryanair £29.99 for his ticket)?

An airline is not a charity - it is a business (needless to say).

Cuillin Hills is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2020, 17:05
  #2759 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,523
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Putting 10 pax on a TUI flight might be cheaper than sending your own a/c to collect them.
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2020, 17:47
  #2760 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In case of disruption all the train operating companies recognise each others tickets
inOban is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.