Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Loganair-2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2020, 13:23
  #1221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,560
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fanrailuk
So called "Scotlands" airline applied for 138 LHR slot pairs....

Which they didn't get.

I do wonder what their master plan is?
"so called Scotland's Airline"
How DARE those little upstarts step outside of their own wee playground!
Look, Loganair are one of the few turboprop operators left in play and they picked up IOM-LCY when BA dropped it. They also moved it to LHR when LCY was closed, flying out of T5 before the BA flight nos were dropped. Now with IOM govt support they are looking to move it back to LHR for reasons of connecting IOM to the wider world. Isn't that a GOOD THING?
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2020, 13:43
  #1222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: IOM
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipness One Foxtrot
"so called Scotland's Airline"
How DARE those little upstarts step outside of their own wee playground!
Look, Loganair are one of the few turboprop operators left in play and they picked up IOM-LCY when BA dropped it. They also moved it to LHR when LCY was closed, flying out of T5 before the BA flight nos were dropped. Now with IOM govt support they are looking to move it back to LHR for reasons of connecting IOM to the wider world. Isn't that a GOOD THING?
Being fimilar with the situation, I think you're pushing it a little far there.

The Government went out to the market and asked all the airlines to come up with a proposal for operating London routes and Loganair's was the most aggresive.

But to your points, BA moved the flights to LHR on their own accord as City was closing. I'm not sure it's to do with connecting people to the world, Loganair doesn't really have any agreements to facilitate that, it's more of a vanity thing for all those involved. The Isle of Man Government are having to commit substantial amounts to this new flight.

Yes it is a good thing and the agreement is to run until the end of the border situation / COVID easing - so probably until May time - but I'm not convinced the costs of going to Heathrow are appropriate to be honest when the City loads are so dire.
JSCL is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2020, 13:58
  #1223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Loganair does have quite a few arrangements to connect passengers on to other airlines. Emirates, BA and KLM are three I can think of straight away and I'm sure there are others.

The current LCY service has a BA codeshare on it as well, so the likelihood is that will be the same at LHR.

Saabdriver1 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2020, 14:03
  #1224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,526
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
The Government went out to the market and asked all the airlines to come up with a proposal for operating London routes and Loganair's was the most aggresive.
Interesting description, was it not also the best?
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 20th Nov 2020, 17:00
  #1225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect he could never bring himself to say such a thing !
Saabdriver1 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2020, 17:04
  #1226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: IOM
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Saabdriver1
I suspect he could never bring himself to say such a thing !
I'm certain I implied best value for money by what I said.

But alas I'm still not convinced its the best, just happy there's finally a degree of security on some routes now.

The commitment to the route from the IOM side is only until the end of the COVID border restrictions and I hope the route matures enough by then for it to maintain a going concern.
JSCL is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2020, 19:50
  #1227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 39
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fanrailuk
So called "Scotlands" airline applied for 138 LHR slot pairs....

Which they didn't get.

I do wonder what their master plan is?
I wonder, did you have an issue with Pan American flying non-USA routes back in the day because of their name?

Loganair could fly Cape Town to Cape Canaveral for all I care, but the fact is they still link more islands and cities in Scotland to one another than any other airline currently does, ever has and likely ever will, so no matter how much they decide to venture outside of Scotland, they will still be rightfully known as Scotlands Airline.
edi_local is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2020, 20:03
  #1228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IOM - BHX as well please, a much missed route for us Midlanders
GayFriendly is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2020, 06:08
  #1229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: N. Irish Sea
Age: 74
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BHX - IOM

Originally Posted by GayFriendly
IOM - BHX as well please, a much missed route for us Midlanders
Your wish has already been granted! Loganair plan to fly BHX - IOM from Summer 2021.
milleriom is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2020, 09:58
  #1230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's great news ,let's hope that comes off. Loads and fares were always traditionally quite robust on this route
GayFriendly is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2020, 20:43
  #1231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So according to SeanM1997, it’s all been loaded now. I’m pleased for Loganair!



BAeuro is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2020, 20:44
  #1232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Teesside, UK
Age: 33
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Loganair are moving their IOM to LCY route to terminate at Heathrow instead from 1st December. Looks to be once daily to start with, though more to be added according to this tweet:

mmeteesside is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2020, 21:40
  #1233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Belfast
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done Loganair.
Alteagod is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2020, 13:17
  #1234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just when you thought LHR couldn’t get any smaller than the Q400.
4567 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2020, 15:02
  #1235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: uk
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 4567
Just when you thought LHR couldn’t get any smaller than the Q400.
Are they still going to operated by an ATR 42 or might they change it to an ERJ 145
rhutch28 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2020, 15:07
  #1236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rhutch28
Are they still going to operated by an ATR 42 or might they change it to an ERJ 145
LM website is showing as an Embraer 145.
goldeneye is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2020, 17:10
  #1237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: EGAC
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do the Logan 145s have restricted runway performance in the wet? I remember that being an issue when BE operated them for a time.
Jenny Tails is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2020, 17:59
  #1238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: IOM
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jenny Tails
Do the Logan 145s have restricted runway performance in the wet? I remember that being an issue when BE operated them for a time.
I seem to recall some of the ex-BMI ones do.

Heard today that the 145 in IOM till recently had a bust APU and they were using the ATR to start it though, was going on for a week or so.
JSCL is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2020, 19:31
  #1239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do we have to put up with this absolute drivel?

The APU of a 145 went u/s in IOM recently. The handling agent's airstart unit was also tech.

The solution was a once-only cross-feed from another 145 which had been flown in straight away to keep the schedule running. This worked to get the original aircraft positioned out of IOM for its APU to be replaced. It took four days to source airstart hoses of the right length and get them to IOM, which was apparently faster than waiting for the Menzies ASU to be sorted.

No ATR involvement and the 145 with the tech APU was out of passenger service, with another 145 keeping the schedule on track.

You make it sound like the 145 with the u/s APU was being jump-started from an ATR for every passenger service, which is far removed from the reality.
Saabdriver1 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2020, 20:11
  #1240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: IOM
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah. No need for the tone. Sounds like someone at Menzies was exaggerating the situation. Probably out of embarrassment, assume the reality is somewhere between the two.
JSCL is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.