Loganair-2
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On the road
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On the road
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd take a punt to say that the codeshare wasn't worth it.
Logan have set fares starting at £80 one way which is a damn sight less than BMI did if I remember correctly.
Only time I flew the route was via a codeshare, connecting onwards from BRU and that was at ludicrously cheap fares - so much so I suspect the high price for those onboard just doing NCL-BRU sector was subsidising it. Plus BRU would be very much down the list of connecting airports I'd want to be stuck in!
Will they make any money? Who knows, it'll be tight I'd suspect!
Logan have set fares starting at £80 one way which is a damn sight less than BMI did if I remember correctly.
Only time I flew the route was via a codeshare, connecting onwards from BRU and that was at ludicrously cheap fares - so much so I suspect the high price for those onboard just doing NCL-BRU sector was subsidising it. Plus BRU would be very much down the list of connecting airports I'd want to be stuck in!
Will they make any money? Who knows, it'll be tight I'd suspect!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a timetable from late 80s where the Loganair network was a bit like Flybe's. I was a travel agent at the time and they said that jets (146) didn't increase pax on BHD MAN and they were going. Not sure about having their fingers burnt but there was a big reorganisation where LC as they were then were restricted to Scotland and a lot of routes went to Manx.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think in the 24 years between Loganair using LC and becoming BA and BE franchise partner the code lapsed. It's now used by Equatorial Guinea Airlines.
I have a screen shot somewhere of a BA to Loganair booking and BA website showing my connecting Loganair flight as being Equatorial Guinea Airlines!
I have a screen shot somewhere of a BA to Loganair booking and BA website showing my connecting Loganair flight as being Equatorial Guinea Airlines!
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How well I recall those days when the flight prefix produced such interesting itineries for my business travellers, some of whom must have thought that their travel agent had gone stark raving mad!!
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Scotland
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not the best hybrid livery but does the job for now!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/885738...dHk5m5-2dquv5i
https://www.flickr.com/photos/885738...dHk5m5-2dquv5i
Photo taken by : https://www.flickr.com/photos/bradley_at_egsh/
I guess time was of the essence and a decal was stuck on overnight, time would have to be booked in for the tail to be resprayed and the rudder rebalanced after repainting
so by the looks it needs a respray anyway so I don`t think it will keep that scheme for long
so by the looks it needs a respray anyway so I don`t think it will keep that scheme for long
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rudder rebalancing is a nightmare after any paint input, so avoiding a lot of work on the tail is best. As for the rest - I don't suppose it matters if the aircraft aren't going to be in these colours for long, as I have to guess the intention will be.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South West
Age: 35
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the 22nd Feb, 6x ex-BMI Regional/flybmi E145s were re-registered to Loganair.
The aircraft were G-RJXC,XD,XE,XH,XI and XM.
These join Loganair's E145 G-SAJC and E135 G-SAJB making a total Embraer fleet of 1x E135, and 7x E145.
The aircraft were G-RJXC,XD,XE,XH,XI and XM.
These join Loganair's E145 G-SAJC and E135 G-SAJB making a total Embraer fleet of 1x E135, and 7x E145.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South West
Age: 35
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ex-BMI Regional/flybmi E145s G-EMBI, BJ and BN are also in the process of being re-registered. Although it can't be seen to whom they are destined for, they started the process on the 18th Feb, only two days after BMIs demise so I assume they may also end up with Loganair making a fleet 1x E135 and 10x E145s!
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Londonderry
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ex-BMI Regional/flybmi E145s G-EMBI, BJ and BN are also in the process of being re-registered. Although it can't be seen to whom they are destined for, they started the process on the 18th Feb, only two days after BMIs demise so I assume they may also end up with Loganair making a fleet 1x E135 and 10x E145s!
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought Loganair were to receive 2 E135's & 2 E145's from Flybmi for summer 19?
I would have thought that the other 3 E135's (G-RJXK, XL & XP) would potential transfer across.
That would leave 5 E145's (G-RJXA, XB & XG, along with G-CKAF & AG) still with Flybmi, although we may see a few of these transferred, if not all.
I would have thought that the other 3 E135's (G-RJXK, XL & XP) would potential transfer across.
That would leave 5 E145's (G-RJXA, XB & XG, along with G-CKAF & AG) still with Flybmi, although we may see a few of these transferred, if not all.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ex-BMI Regional/flybmi E145s G-EMBI, BJ and BN are also in the process of being re-registered. Although it can't be seen to whom they are destined for, they started the process on the 18th Feb, only two days after BMIs demise so I assume they may also end up with Loganair making a fleet 1x E135 and 10x E145s!
3 @ 135 G-RJXK, XL, XP.
5 @ 145 G-CKAF, AG, G-RJXA, XB, XG
I am working from the current fleet listed for BMI on FR24. I wonder if they are all operational.