Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Flybe-9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Oct 2019, 06:56
  #2441 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: back end of beyond
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oapilot



What are the ATR cross wind limits exactly?
ATR 72-600 35 knots dry runway 28 knots wet, Q400 32 knots both .......
desk_bound is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 09:14
  #2442 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leeds, UK & Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wasn't suggesting that the Q400s are dogs, my point was that blaming the Q400 for all of flyBe's problems isn't realistic. A shiny new fleet of A220s, for example, won't solve a thing. You could argue that flying 150 seat jets around the UK half empty would make things a lot worse... The A220s are not exactly trouble-free at the moment either.

[QUOTE=desk_bound;10597285]
ATR 72-600 35 knots dry runway 28 knots wet, Q400 32 knots both .......
The ATR is better in the dry than the Q? Granted, at the Isle of Man its wet more often than it is dry! I think some people have decided they do not like the Q and all of flyBe's woes are due to it. Personally I don't think there is much between them. They both have the disadvantages associated with props, but the advantage of low fuel-burn, which is important on regional routes, especially when air passengers pay APD and train passengers do not, for example.
brian_dromey is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 13:18
  #2443 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well there you go


https://www.orcadian.co.uk/loganair-...are-agreement/
SealinkBF is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 21:00
  #2444 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: looking out of the window
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SealinkBF
why are you linking to an article from 2 years ago?
whitelighter is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 21:16
  #2445 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oxon
Age: 47
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check the date on the article, whitelighter. And the code share agreement was confirmed today
redflyer is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 01:50
  #2446 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been flying on the Q400 for 13 years basically since they were introduced at Flybe, granted not on a weekly basis like some commuters.

I have never had a tech cancellation or extensive delay. I am probably just very lucky but it’s like any mode of transport the more you use it the more experience you have both positive and negative. I take the train regularly to work and have more problems on that compared to my family who use it only at weekends.

The Q400 hasn’t been grounded for engine issues nor was it entirely grounded during the SAS fiasco over the gear. I think people forget that these aircraft are operating multiple sectors a day compared to some airlines with the jet - so they will be prone to more TLC.
Cloud1 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 05:29
  #2447 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,526
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Flybe, Europe’s largest regional airline and Loganair, Scotland’s airline, today (17 October) announced a new co-operation agreement that offers customers the choice of a broad range of additional travel connections throughout the UK and Europe
UK Regional Airline connectivity takes off with new Flybe and Loganair agreement
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 09:50
  #2448 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by desk_bound


ATR 72-600 35 knots dry runway 28 knots wet, Q400 32 knots both .......
So statistically how much more often are ATR flights cancelled/diverted when it is wet because of the 4kt disadvantage in those conditions - compared to Q400 diversions when it is dry because of the 3kt disadvantage of the Q400 in that scenario?
virginblue is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 10:00
  #2449 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by virginblue
So statistically how much more often are ATR flights cancelled/diverted when it is wet because of the 4kt disadvantage in those conditions - compared to Q400 diversions when it is dry because of the 3kt disadvantage of the Q400 in that scenario?
I've seen plenty a Stobart ATR continuing to operate into airports where Flybe Dash's have gone around or cancelled.
bigjim99 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 10:12
  #2450 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The majority of cancellations on the Isle of Man are not down to a wet runway. If the wind howls on the Isle of Man then it’s usually way out of limits. Of course there is the odd time it’s an issue but its rare.

the majority of cancellations by a mile are down to the below standard ILS. having operated there for a couple of winters if they had a cat II then there would have rarely been a divert. The ILS affects all operators regardless of type.

as for FLYBE vs stobart? Since FLYBE took over there have been a lot of tech / crewing issues plus frequency reductions especially on LPL
cumbrianboy is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 10:50
  #2451 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. My question was more of a rhetoric nature as I feel that the "crosswind issue" that comes up regularly is wildly exaggerated.
virginblue is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 11:31
  #2452 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by virginblue
Thanks. My question was more of a rhetoric nature as I feel that the "crosswind issue" that comes up regularly is wildly exaggerated.
Whatever the pros & cons, BE/VS are not going to be replacing 54 Q400’s anytime soon!
stewyb is online now  
Old 21st Oct 2019, 20:20
  #2453 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having read that Hop is being downsized, maybe Flybe feeding pax into the Air France network replacing Hop?
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2019, 15:34
  #2454 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Chester
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe has recently installed a 737-800 Simulator at their training academy in Exeter...
8674planes is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2019, 17:02
  #2455 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Down a Tin mine......
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Boeing B738 simulator is nothing to do with Flybe, and is owned by a private company who are renting the spare space from Flybe. They use the 738 sim to offer flight experiences and is owned and run by a former TUI pilot.
Whispering Giant is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2019, 19:30
  #2456 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have flown DUB to Southampton Every friday for the last two years and only twice it has been early and very rare ontime.

A
Bournemouthair is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2019, 21:59
  #2457 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bournemouthair
I have flown DUB to Southampton Every friday for the last two years and only twice it has been early and very rare ontime.

A
Yet still better than flying Dublin to Gatwick and commuting to your destination? Can’t be that bad
Cloud1 is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2019, 15:19
  #2458 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Belfast, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As part of the ongoing program of operational resilience, the business has entered into a wet lease agreement with Stobart Air for two E190 aircraft. Discussions between the Commercial Department and Crew Resource Planning have highlighted Belfast and Edinburgh as the bases best suited to the wet lease. These aircraft will operate on the heavily subscribed routes into London City providing enhancements to our corporate markets from both locations.One E190 aircraft will be based at each of those locations, operating throughout the winter schedule from 01 December 2019. This will not affect the cabin crew numbers at either base, and the planned recruitment for EDI will continue, the wet lease, along with additional crew members will support and ease the operations out of both Belfast and Edinburgh. This will also free up a number of duty days providing relief throughout the winter for Belfast and Edinburgh where we have been particularly affected by crew shortages.If you have any questions, please make contact with your Performance Manager who can help answer any questions that you might have
Email sent to crew yesterday evening
Not sure if this is new information
BFS101 is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2019, 15:33
  #2459 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EDI, LHR, NQY
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes absolute sense.
ajamieson is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2019, 16:16
  #2460 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leeds, UK & Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajamieson
Makes absolute sense.
So Stobart are taking over IoM (2x AT7) and LCY-BHD/EDI (2x 190) for the winter.
brian_dromey is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.