Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Flybe-9

Old 25th Nov 2018, 16:34
  #1141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,465
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If IAG are genuinely involved - and they are likely to need to say something sooner than later - then it will only be to drive up any price Virgin would have to pay. There is nothing here for IAG beyond competition issues galore at LHR and LCY.
Flightrider is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 16:49
  #1142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly I doubt IAG will have the slightest interest in Flybe. They would be returning to a market where they saw massive losses as BA Regional. I also Doubt if Virgin will be interested, their entry into the short haul business was a financial disaster and relatively short lived. As the larger markets are well served by carriers with lower seat costs, there is no future here for a carrier operating expensive turboprops. So the future is likely to be in Niche markets and by definition there are not too many of these that will support mid size turbo props. I do hope Flybe survives but I fear it will shrink to do this. Good Luck.
unowot is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 16:53
  #1143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Denmark
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flightrider
If IAG are genuinely involved - and they are likely to need to say something sooner than later - then it will only be to drive up any price Virgin would have to pay. There is nothing here for IAG beyond competition issues galore at LHR and LCY.
What value do you see in it for Virgin?

Whatever happens, the other UK regional carriers can pick up other profitable routes.
Copenhagen is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 16:56
  #1144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
I very much doubt that IAG would be interested in saying something just to raise the price Virgin would have to pay or create a bidding war - it usually means a binding statement to be credible enough to raise a share price and is a dangerous game to play that rarely ends well.

On the other hand I could quite easily see IAG saying something publicly if they could get a good look at the confidential side of Flybe's books and gain good knowledge of non public info, without having to make a full bid
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 17:13
  #1145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Current share price is 16p
With interest from Vigin, IAG, And possibly Stobart let alone EZY, i wonder if share price will head north?
Navpi is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 19:51
  #1146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,541
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PDXCWL45
Yes but more and more are choosing to fly from their own country and Flybe is a crucial part of that. Lose them will be a big blow for Wales.
Fair point. It’s also backed to the hilt with taxpayers money, like NQY, and yet still flybe struggle. CWL’s problem is more easyJet at BRS than BA at the other end of the GWR.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 20:08
  #1147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipness One Foxtrot

Fair point. It’s also backed to the hilt with taxpayers money, like NQY, and yet still flybe struggle. CWL’s problem is more easyJet at BRS than BA at the other end of the GWR.
Incentives were provided from the airport but that is no different than any other airport.
As for BRS yes that will always be a drain on Cardiff Airport (even if APD was devolved one day) but Flybe have shown that if the flights are provided then people will use them, around 480,000 passengers (CAA stats are the source) used Flybe from CWL in 2017 and because of that there has been more positivity around CWL than negativity lately, people who i know have always used BRS have started to use CWL as well and will do so in the future and that comes from having Flybe at the airport. That is why their survival and continued operations at CWL is extremely important for the airport.
I mentioned BA because IAG own them and they are essentially their UK airline and while yes Vueling provide flights to the sun, i'm sure IAG would prefer people like me who use city routes or travel long haul to use LHR.
PDXCWL45 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 20:33
  #1148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipness One Foxtrot

Fair point. It’s also backed to the hilt with taxpayers money, like NQY, and yet still flybe struggle. CWL’s problem is more easyJet at BRS than BA at the other end of the GWR.
'Backed to the hilt' is a tad disingenuous is it not? Flybe (not including franchisees) have one PSO (which any EU operator could apply to operate) out of the 150 or so routes they operate.

Good if it were true but personally, I doubt IAG's interest. However it may be valid to consider what risk a strengthened VS, aligned with AF-KLM may pose as a threat to the IAG stable of carriers. All those potential regional passengers that IAG might lose as a result of Flybe routing them via LHR/MAN onto VS, or via CDG and AMS on AF-KLM?

On the eve of LHR getting more capacity, just perhaps IAG could consider it to be a valid investment, after all who else is likely to provide regional connectivity to new points in the UK when a third runway gets built at LHR. BACF maybe, but not at the cost of a BE DH4 they won't, and not with crew and aircraft at mutiple UK regional bases.

Last edited by JobsaGoodun; 25th Nov 2018 at 20:49.
JobsaGoodun is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 20:43
  #1149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Solihull
Age: 59
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sale

Originally Posted by Copenhagen


What value do you see in it for Virgin?

Whatever happens, the other UK regional carriers can pick up other profitable routes.
A question on that point, if a potential buyer wants to do due diligence what access to they get to the financials? Obviously there are the published accounts but do they get commercial sensitive information about bases/individual routes?

Just for a bit of information to give an idea of their current operation I have tried to note down the First wave of departures tomorrow morning and it makes interesting reading in parts. The usual disclaimers none more so than I can't say if it is definitive but I have used various public domain websites such as Jethro's for operational aircraft and FR24.

I found 57 departures and a maximum 75 aircraft in service (actually 69 left as I had included one DH8D not in sevice and included the Stobart 195's) of which one E175 has been at Exeter since 4 November, a Dash 8 at Exeter since 13-11 (PD), one since 18-11 (PI), one since 22-11 (OK), one at BHX since 22-11 (OR) and another at Exeter since 23-11 (DR). Up until 19.00 57 aircraft had moved today and around 3 or 4 extra yesterday. This is just Flybe mainline not Eastern or Blue Island flights or aircraft or the Stobart Southend operation.

This shows they have a lot of spare aircraft and do we know how many are owned and how many leased? This seems incredibly high even for winter which in terms of the BHX base is not particularly off-peak and in fact next week the base is back to 11 aircraft with Milan and Berlin going back to double daily on certain days for the first 3 weeks in December. Also noticeable that the jets all move regularly other than E175 "JI" which is clearly in maintenance.

For those debating what is in it for the airlines rumoured to be interested, these are tomorrow's flights - first wave only and I believe there are no overnighting mainline aircraft at Dublin, Inverness, Newcastle, Leeds, Liverpool, East Mids, Norwich, London City, Heathrow, Gatwick, Jersey, Guernsey, Amsterdam or Paris. Any additions and corrections most welcome. Formatting as usual on this site a nightmare.

Airport...….... Based Aircraft.....Time:Route…....Time:Route…....Time:Route…....Time:Route………..Time:Route
Aberdeen.........3..................…07:05 BHX...…….07:05 LHR...…..06:35 MAN...…..
Belfast City...…7...............…...07:00 BHX......…..07:15 EMA...….07:10 EDI...........07:20 GLA............06:40 LBA.
.........…........................……….
06:45 LCY...……..06:50 MAN
BHX...…........10..................….06:55 AMS...…….08:00 AMS...….07:35 BHD.........07:00 DUS...….....07:00 EDI.
...........................................….
07:00 GLA...…....07:15 JER...…..06:45 MXP.........06:40 CDG...…....07:20 STR......11th next week TXL 07:25
Cardiff......…...3.................……06:40 EDI.........…06:20 BHD.......07:00 DUB
Doncaster.......1......................06:50 DUB
Dusseldorf.....2.......................06:30 BHX.........…06:50 LCY
Edinburgh.......8..................….07:20 BHD...……..07:00 BHX...….07:20 EMA...…..06:35 LCY......…..07:05 LCY
..............................................
06:20 LHR..........06:35 MAN......06:40 SOU.
Exeter...……...5................…….07:10 JER.........….07:00 LCY......06:40 MAN.........07:25 AGP......…..06:30 CDG
Glasgow.........4..............……..06:50 BHX......…..07:05 EMA.......06:50 MAN...…..07:00 SOU
Manchester.....6.....
…...........….06:45 ABZ............06:55 AMS...….07:00 BHD........07.00 DUS.........06.10 CDG
..........................................….
06:50 CDG
Newquay...…..1........................07:25 NQY
Southampton..7........................07:00 AMS...…...07:00 BHD...….06:50 DUB.........07:00 EDI...……..06:45 MAN
............................................….
07:00 NCL...…...06:50 CDG
Total...……....57


Pete

Last edited by OltonPete; 26th Nov 2018 at 18:01. Reason: Add information about number of aircraft
OltonPete is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 21:36
  #1150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OltonPete
A question on that point, if a potential buyer wants to do due diligence what access to they get to the financials? Obviously there are the published accounts but do they get commercial sensitive information about bases/individual routes?
I have never done and M&A deal in the airline industry but in general, any serious buyer would always get access to detailed financials on the target company. The published accounts will hardly get a second look, the management accounts are the important thing.

Disclosure of commercially sensitive information is always quite a difficult area, especially when talking to a direct competitor so I doubt the detailed base/route data would be disclosed at this stage. But then again it depends on how bad the FlyBe financials are and how desperate the management are to sell.
tigertanaka is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2018, 22:41
  #1151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,541
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Backed to the hilt' is a tad disingenuous is it not? Flybe (not including franchisees) have one PSO (which any EU operator could apply to operate) out of the 150 or so routes they operate.
I meant CWL, like PIK is by the Scottish Government.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 06:19
  #1152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PDXCWL45
Incentives were provided from the airport but that is no different than any other airport.
As for BRS yes that will always be a drain on Cardiff Airport (even if APD was devolved one day) but Flybe have shown that if the flights are provided then people will use them, around 480,000 passengers (CAA stats are the source) used Flybe from CWL in 2017 and because of that there has been more positivity around CWL than negativity lately, people who i know have always used BRS have started to use CWL as well and will do so in the future and that comes from having Flybe at the airport. That is why their survival and continued operations at CWL is extremely important for the airport.
How many seats were available in 2017?

Flybe have much bigger fish to fry in other airports over CWL.
caaardiff is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 06:37
  #1153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RogueOne
Lets look at it from another point of view... what if any buyer doesn't necessarily want Flybe, what if they only want to prevent their competition getting it?
Plausible acquision strategy, as with any M&A strategy in any space. Goes with the territory.
mik3bravo is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 06:38
  #1154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caaardiff
How many seats were available in 2017?

Flybe have much bigger fish to fry in other airports over CWL.
About 650,000 seats for the year roughly. 73% of the seats were sold which i think is in line with their average LF.
Yes they do have bigger fish to fry then little CWL but that doesn't take away how important they are to the airport. If they do pull out it'll be interesting to see what effect it has on the airport as a whole as i can't see them be replaced. For airports like EXT and SOU the effects would be even bigger as they too won't find a replacement airline.
PDXCWL45 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 07:05
  #1155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Somerset
Posts: 182
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It seems like Flybe chose a strategy to differentiate away from Locos with smaller aircraft, thinner routes and a more premium, old style pricing structure. It didn't work. The Loco model is dominant and they now offer the benefits of the old model with ticket flexibility, bags included, even meals and middle seat free on some. Flybe made the wrong choice of commercial model, tied themselve into leases which meant they couldn't change model quickly and backed the wrong horse. Now a sale looms, if not, decline until a pre-pack adminstration can shake off all the leases and allow replacement by the ubiquitous 737/320. The airline business is now in the right hand side of the industry/poduct life cycle curve - lowest long run production costs, little innovation ad tending towards a utility (except utilities make money). The only way is lower and lower wages, automation and lowest seat/mile costs for the aircraft.
Blackfriar is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 07:34
  #1156 (permalink)  
Tabs please !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Biffins Bridge
Posts: 931
Received 284 Likes on 164 Posts
Originally Posted by OltonPete
A question on that point, if a potential buyer wants to do due diligence what access to they get to the financials? Obviously there are the published accounts but do they get commercial sensitive information about bases/individual routes ?
I have a bit of experience on M&A. Once a buyer has stated their interest and signed all the requisite NDAs, they will have access to everything including the annual bill for loo roll. In my view, the company will be segmented with the purchaser taking the choice cuts through a new company and leaving what it doesn't want for the creditors to fight over at pennies in the pound. The old Flybe could be made more efficient such as pooling the fuel futures but the huge disparity in spend and lack of commonality suggests that Big Virgin would see zero benefit. The lack of a third runway at EGLL and spare capacity at EGKK limits options to gather feeder traffic from regional and near continent departure points. Whether the interest is genuine remains to be seen.
B Fraser is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 08:50
  #1157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems like Flybe chose a strategy to differentiate away from Locos with smaller aircraft, thinner routes and a more premium, old style pricing structure. It didn't work.
They didn't really. Rather they tried to fly routes that would not support a 737/320. Yes you might be able to fly a couple of times a day between SOU or BHX and EDI with those bigger aircraft, but you couldn't offer business friendly frequency. The problem remains for flights from airports like EXT,SOU,BHX, EMA, NWI etc. Many people want to fly form these but not at business Eastern airways type prices- other folk will travel to BRS,STN,LGW to get a loco fare. I don't know if the niche I have explained which Flybe were trying to fill, is profitable in the new era.
22/04 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 09:29
  #1158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like IAG are in
10.07 today
https://news.sky.com/story/flybe-boosted-by-report-of-ba-owner-interest-11564094
Navpi is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 09:58
  #1159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question for those in the know. I bought Flybe shares a while ago. If IAG buy Flybe what will happen to Flybe shares?
Reversethrustset is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2018, 10:19
  #1160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: glasgow
Posts: 382
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe shares will cease to exist.
You will be paid their value when the sale is finalised.
renfrew is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.