Flybe-9

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: mids
Age: 57
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slight difference is that INV has 4 trains a day and they are more than likely to go tech due to landslides etc.
Anyone think any airline is going to touch the with TUPE etc then they are sadly mistaken. Government sub not going to happen either due to being highly illegal.
Honestly flybe's management are utter heads up their own arse by buying the setup and AoC your taking on all the redundancy payments and more importantly all the baggage and useless management. Operating crew and gingers no an issue with the rest of the dead wood nobody will touch.
Anyone think any airline is going to touch the with TUPE etc then they are sadly mistaken. Government sub not going to happen either due to being highly illegal.
Honestly flybe's management are utter heads up their own arse by buying the setup and AoC your taking on all the redundancy payments and more importantly all the baggage and useless management. Operating crew and gingers no an issue with the rest of the dead wood nobody will touch.

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what we have with the transfer of the route to Heathrow is:
* The existing PSO subsidy was about to run out and has been renewed. That's the government involvement explained.
* Heathrow offers £15 / pax discount on handling charges for new UK routes. That's Heathrow's involvement explained.
* Flybe was able to obtain remedy slots at LHR from the IAG/bmi takeover. That's the airline's involvement explained.
I really can't see anything more substantive for the airline than this - other than that it might be able to sell its existing slots at LGW.
* The existing PSO subsidy was about to run out and has been renewed. That's the government involvement explained.
* Heathrow offers £15 / pax discount on handling charges for new UK routes. That's Heathrow's involvement explained.
* Flybe was able to obtain remedy slots at LHR from the IAG/bmi takeover. That's the airline's involvement explained.
I really can't see anything more substantive for the airline than this - other than that it might be able to sell its existing slots at LGW.

Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Scotland
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slight difference is that INV has 4 trains a day and they are more than likely to go tech due to landslides etc.
Anyone think any airline is going to touch the with TUPE etc then they are sadly mistaken. Government sub not going to happen either due to being highly illegal.
Honestly flybe's management are utter heads up their own arse by buying the setup and AoC your taking on all the redundancy payments and more importantly all the baggage and useless management. Operating crew and gingers no an issue with the rest of the dead wood nobody will touch.
Anyone think any airline is going to touch the with TUPE etc then they are sadly mistaken. Government sub not going to happen either due to being highly illegal.
Honestly flybe's management are utter heads up their own arse by buying the setup and AoC your taking on all the redundancy payments and more importantly all the baggage and useless management. Operating crew and gingers no an issue with the rest of the dead wood nobody will touch.

Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts


Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: mids
Age: 57
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was born north of Dundee and connections to London other than Air are utterly pants. Sleeper is a nice option though which i do pay the extra for on occasion.
Virgin trains I might understand an interest in the operation.... but then again they have similar issues as flybe….
Atlantic more than likely operates with a couple of ops controllers one tech guy 24H to take on the flybe fleet would blow the ops model out the water. Can't see it myself...
Virgin trains I might understand an interest in the operation.... but then again they have similar issues as flybe….
Atlantic more than likely operates with a couple of ops controllers one tech guy 24H to take on the flybe fleet would blow the ops model out the water. Can't see it myself...

Join Date: May 2017
Location: Belfast
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So is it Virgin Purple? Tiny Virgin ? Fly Virgin? Virgin BE? Flyrgin UK? I think they would only be interested in feeding into there own network. Would they be arsed with the trans UK routes???


Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: mids
Age: 57
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no they wouldn't and nobody else would either.
Not that would effect the Viet taff or scots nats types opinions who would more than likely demand the service provision even though they would only use it twice a year and pay the sub cost ticket price and botch that its to expensive.
Not that would effect the Viet taff or scots nats types opinions who would more than likely demand the service provision even though they would only use it twice a year and pay the sub cost ticket price and botch that its to expensive.

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Meanwhile over at a well run airline, the CEO states publicly that Brexit has not made any difference to his business. Profits are up 15.6%. I wonder what COW knows that he doesn't ?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...demise-rivals/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...demise-rivals/
I have rarely booked anything beyond Feb-Mar at this time of year, many people will be the same. 2 weeks post Christmas may be a better indication as many book holidays or summer flights between Christmas and New Year.


Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- Virgin Little Red operated Airbus on the domestic routes which were too big for what they needed. Flybe are already operating LHR-EDI & ABZ which could be strengthened for much needed connections that VS need through LHR, along with the recently announced NQY flights. Operated on a much more efficient aircraft to the demand that VS has.
- Secondly BE has a big presence at MAN as does VS, which could grow even further.
- It may also see a stronger return of BE in LGW feeding VS flights from there, and also flights from GLA which BE already codeshare on.
- Add into the mix DL's connections as well from various airports.
Throw into the mix a possible additional feed for KL/AF. BE already have strong links with AF codeshares through CDG and operate into AMS which would provide additional slots to feed KL. This could free up KL Cityhopper aircraft for new routes throughout Europe.
As a group project I see this as a positive for all carriers involved if they can get the route network and feed right.
What's left is the bases that provide little addition to the group of Airlines which could see cuts. BHX has it's own BE fortress if they wanted to keep that running.
- Secondly BE has a big presence at MAN as does VS, which could grow even further.
- It may also see a stronger return of BE in LGW feeding VS flights from there, and also flights from GLA which BE already codeshare on.
- Add into the mix DL's connections as well from various airports.
Throw into the mix a possible additional feed for KL/AF. BE already have strong links with AF codeshares through CDG and operate into AMS which would provide additional slots to feed KL. This could free up KL Cityhopper aircraft for new routes throughout Europe.
As a group project I see this as a positive for all carriers involved if they can get the route network and feed right.
What's left is the bases that provide little addition to the group of Airlines which could see cuts. BHX has it's own BE fortress if they wanted to keep that running.
