Thomas Cook-2
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Daft thing is the statutory redundancy bill for the Treasury is likely to be in excess of £50 million just for Thomas Cook UK. Lost PAYE, VAT on wages spent plus all the fallout on suppliers and their employees and £200 million doesn't look like a lot of money.
But under no illusions, the government won't be stepping up and neither should they.
But under no illusions, the government won't be stepping up and neither should they.
I've just successfully checked us in online for tomorrow's flight home to MAN. Sadly many of the friends we have made in the resort are the usual mix of families with young children and older couples who are all now extremely worried about their flights later in the week.
We all here feel for the Thomas Cook crews but seeing how it affects the passengers is sobering.
Will be passing on our best wishes to the crew tomorrow .....
We all here feel for the Thomas Cook crews but seeing how it affects the passengers is sobering.
Will be passing on our best wishes to the crew tomorrow .....
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monrovia / Liberia
Age: 63
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rushed Approach: just a point about terminology... wrt "The CAA is also very hard-nosed in the financial due diligence it carries out when renewing an airline's AOC and may itself have asked for a previously unforeseen "bond" to be lodged with it before the new AOC can be issued."
An AOC (Air Operators Certificate) is to do with the aspects of an airline to operate safely.
Whereas the OL (Operating License) is to do with an airline's financial fitness.
There's no doubt about Thomas Cook's AOC (i.e. it's safety to operate) but there are certainly some doubts about its OL (i.e. it's financial fitness to operate).
See also: https://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-ind...ting-licences/
An AOC (Air Operators Certificate) is to do with the aspects of an airline to operate safely.
Whereas the OL (Operating License) is to do with an airline's financial fitness.
There's no doubt about Thomas Cook's AOC (i.e. it's safety to operate) but there are certainly some doubts about its OL (i.e. it's financial fitness to operate).
See also: https://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-ind...ting-licences/
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Daft thing is the statutory redundancy bill for the Treasury is likely to be in excess of £50 million just for Thomas Cook UK. Lost PAYE, VAT on wages spent plus all the fallout on suppliers and their employees and £200 million doesn't look like a lot of money.
But under no illusions, the government won't be stepping up and neither should they.
But under no illusions, the government won't be stepping up and neither should they.
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Exmouth
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wolverhampton
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having been on the Pax end of the Monarch collapse (in FUE at the time) I wonder if tonight will bring another 'wham, bam, thank you m'am' and as soon as tonights last aircraft has landed in the UK in the early hours of Sunday, that'll be it.
So sad if so, for all those working for the TC companies.
Said Pax in resort will likely be taken care of.
So sad if so, for all those working for the TC companies.
Said Pax in resort will likely be taken care of.
It is not fact. So I ask again? Why are you criticising others for doing what you are doing?
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Uk
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've just successfully checked us in online for tomorrow's flight home to MAN. Sadly many of the friends we have made in the resort are the usual mix of families with young children and older couples who are all now extremely worried about their flights later in the week.
We all here feel for the Thomas Cook crews but seeing how it affects the passengers is sobering.
Will be passing on our best wishes to the crew tomorrow .....
We all here feel for the Thomas Cook crews but seeing how it affects the passengers is sobering.
Will be passing on our best wishes to the crew tomorrow .....
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Exmouth
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a human being sympathetic to another human isn’t an unkind gesture. It’s usually welcome and certainly better than the opposite. I appreciated people extending themselves during similarly stressful times in my career.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere
Age: 41
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CAA has confirmed that the Atol scheme has funds of more than £170 million available to bail out holidaymakers, with additional insurance cover totalling a further £400 million.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And if anyone did, the card company won't be giving TC a penny of the money until a long time from now.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given the number of crew who have already been through an airline going into administration of at least know someone who has, I think you'll be lucky if there is enough staff to fly the outbound sector. I'd be thinking twice about turning up for no sa or commission, statutory redundancy and maybe a basic reference you can use for your next airside pass (if you're lucky).
I agree with 2Para the crew won't want to hear a load of rubbish of pax that really are just happy their own a***s are ok. If you want to be nice to the crew just give them an easy flight home.
I agree with 2Para the crew won't want to hear a load of rubbish of pax that really are just happy their own a***s are ok. If you want to be nice to the crew just give them an easy flight home.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure that characterising all your pax as stupid is very productive - after all they're not responsible for what may or may not be happening to the company. I'm sure the crew would appreciate a kind word from those thoughtful enough to give it (I know Monarch crews were) - of course many pax won't do that anyway and will be more interested in when the bar trolley gets to them. Believe it or not many pax are very emotionally attached to the airlines they fly on.
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wolverhampton
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In no way does it compare to how Crew and all employees must have felt but we felt really saddened at the demise of a company who always seemed to put the Customer first.
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
763 Jock, I sincerely hope that you won’t need it! If you ever need it then you will unfortunately find out that you won’t be getting 20 x £525.
The calculator on the GOV.UK website assumes that your employer is still operating. Once you are made redundant due to your employer going bust, several other caps are introduced and you get nowhere near the amount of 20 x £525. Unfortunately I found out the hard way when Monarch went bust.
The calculator on the GOV.UK website assumes that your employer is still operating. Once you are made redundant due to your employer going bust, several other caps are introduced and you get nowhere near the amount of 20 x £525. Unfortunately I found out the hard way when Monarch went bust.
If I remember rightly from February this year the max is 12 weeks at £525 maximum. Btw you get no statutory redundancy with less than 2 years service. You can also them apply for loss of notice pay at the same cap of £525 per week but I think the maximum regardless is still 12 weeks total. Some guys waited ages for payment. I only waited 3 weeks, it seemed random??