Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Heathrow-2

Old 23rd Mar 2019, 16:13
  #921 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Age: 65
Posts: 140
Would you say that the latest results support Action 2.2 in the newly published Noise Action Plan 2019-2023 (adopted and approved by Michael Gove Feb 2019) ?:

https://www.heathrow.com/file_source..._2019-2023.pdf
2.2 FQG improvement

We will work with airlines to improve the overall FQG scores, working towards increasing the green scores.

Performance Indicator :Number of green scores
Target : More green score dots than 2018 baseline

AVGEN does get an honourable mention in the Consultation Response section of the Supporting Annexes document :

https://www.heathrow.com/file_source...ng_Annexes.pdf

Theme or Issue :
"We are aware of criticism by aviation
consultants AvGen of how these are reported
and consider that the points they raise about
the discrepancies between actual performance
of certain airlines and their ratings should be
investigated further by Heathrow.
FQG programme criticism by AvGen should
be explained."

Heathrow Response :

"This was discussed and recorded in the minutes at
the Heathrow Community Noise Forum in September
2017. https://www.heathrow.com/file_source/
HeathrowNoise/Static/HCNF_meeting_notes_20_
Sept_2017.pdf Also see the outcomes mentioned in
Annex 13, Action 2.1."
118.70 is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2019, 19:46
  #922 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 10,886
Originally Posted by Navpi View Post
Do we know at what point we are with RW3 ?

It all seems to have gone quiet.
https://www.judiciary.uk/publication...t-transcripts/
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2019, 11:29
  #923 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 60
Posts: 465
One wonders with a change of cabinet if matters Heathrow may change.

Gove aka Mr Bean, has just come from environment minister so will surely be tackled on the effect Heathrow expansion will have on Londoners. I'm not a tree hugger but it's beyond bizarre that the mayor is introducing a mega low emissions tax on the ground but cropspraying those chirpy cockneys from the air is not part of the equation ?

...and what of Grayling ? Toast !

Last edited by Navpi; 24th Mar 2019 at 12:05.
Navpi is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2019, 16:55
  #924 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 10,886
Originally Posted by 118.70 View Post
Would you say that the latest results support Action 2.2 in the newly published Noise Action Plan 2019-2023 (adopted and approved by Michael Gove Feb 2019) ?:

https://www.heathrow.com/file_source..._2019-2023.pdf
2.2 FQG improvement

We will work with airlines to improve the overall FQG scores, working towards increasing the green scores.

Performance Indicator: Number of green scores
Target: More green score dots than 2018 baseline
It's interesting that those Noise Action Plan targets are expressed purely in terms of "green dots", i.e. the number of results that fall into the Green band of the Red/Amber/Green "RAG" classification.

That sounds like a tacit acknowledgement by Heathrow that those dodgy Fly Quiet points and league tables aren't actually any use for gauging whether airlines are improving their environmental performance.

Not that the RAG classifications are much better - while some of the metrics award a Green dot based on actual performance thresholds (CDAs and Track-keeping, for example), others (e.g. NOx and Quota Count) simply give all but the worst 25% of airlines a Green classification without requiring them to achieve any specific threshold.

Nor do the Noise Action Plan targets take any account of the relative importance attached to the different performance metrics - for example Track-keeping carries three times as much FQ&G weight as NOx emissions, but Green classifications for either count equally towards the NAP target.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2019, 19:47
  #925 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 38
Posts: 423
but cropspraying those chirpy cockneys from the air is not part of the equation ?
Fabulous point Navpi, perhaps Manchester can lead the way in green matters and just close MAN entirely, I think you'll agree that's what's best for those Northerners, given their relatively limited life expectancy against those, what was it you actually said, "chirpy cockneys"?
You should really visit Cockney-land one day with your own mince pies, you'd be amazed.

I'll leave it in your more than capable hands......
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2019, 20:35
  #926 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 60
Posts: 465
The premise of my comment was nothing to do with Manchester but the absurdity of penalising drivers on the ground with the new eye-watering emission charges whilst making no comment about the particles raining down from the air.

...But of course you knew that didn't you
Navpi is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2019, 22:00
  #927 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: warrington,England
Posts: 42
Hi

What construction work are they now doing at Terminal 2? Looks like they are digging deep

Thanks
mufc4evr is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2019, 17:07
  #928 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 119
Originally Posted by Navpi View Post
The premise of my comment was nothing to do with Manchester but the absurdity of penalising drivers on the ground with the new eye-watering emission charges whilst making no comment about the particles raining down from the air.
Perhaps because passenger cars generated just under 70% of the greenhouse gases emitted in the transport category? Table 3 of the Data Tables from the Government 2017 Greenhouse Emissions Statistics refers.
SamYeager is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2019, 20:28
  #929 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 60
Posts: 465
Hmmmm.... May going?
The end is nigh for Failing Grayling....and what now for Heathrow?
Navpi is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2019, 13:51
  #930 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 89
LHR - IOM resurrected 21st April 1xdaily Dh8 Q400
euromanxdude is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2019, 13:57
  #931 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 446
Flybe Connect Heathrow with Isle of Man

A new daily Flybe service connecting Heathrow with Isle of Man will commence as early as 21st April! The route will be operated by Flybe Dash8-Q400 aircraft and is on sale now.

https://www.flybe.com/cheap-flights/isle-of-man

Quite a short lead time for bookings but i wonder if its something they've been working on for a while. I presume this will be another PSO type route?

Flybe are certainly getting quite an operation at LHR and definitely giving travellers more choice and connection opportunities with other airlines.
Cazza_fly is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2019, 20:02
  #932 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Age: 49
Posts: 992
presume these are just slot sitters? As i doubt thst route will give return on a high value slot
VickersVicount is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2019, 13:50
  #933 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 10,886
Heathrow owns up to Fly Quiet & Green errors

Owns up, that's to say, only in the sense that following my previous post it has made a series of unannounced, undocumented changes to the Q4 2018 "league table" (presumably in the hope that nobody will notice!), but with no explicit acknowledgement that anything has actually changed.

This time around, even a cursory glance at the results is sufficient to illustrate how absurd they are - instead of giving the airlines an average score of around 750 out of 1000, as with previous quarters' results (already grossly inflated), Heathrow has hiked the average score by over 8% to 813 points.
Heathrow has now retrospectively adjusted the average points scored by airlines in Q4 2018 from 813 to 727, and has likewise amended all the individual airline scores, without any acknowledgement whatsoever that anything has been changed. The newly-adjusted scores are still, of course, around 40% higher than they ought to be if the stated rules of the scheme were being followed.

Not content with inflating the scores even more than usual, Heathrow has also inexplicably excluded 5 of its 50 busiest airlines from the results.

We will never know how China Southern, El Al, Korean Air, Kuwait Airways or Pakistan International Airlines are judged to have performed, because Egyptair short/longhaul, Icelandair (ditto) and MEA longhaul (all with fewer flights than any of the above) have been substituted instead. In fact El Al and China Southern had over three times as many flights as MEA longhaul during Q4.
China Southern, El Al, Kuwait and PIA have now miraculously appeared in the results, although oddly Royal Air Maroc has also been added, despite having fewer flights than Korean Air (which is still absent).

The "league table" ranking, in descending order of points awarded by Heathrow, includes the bizarre sequence: 9th, 10th, 13th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th, 27th, 20th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd, 24th, 25th, 24th, 27th, 28th.
Happily, Heathrow has now discovered how to count from 1 to 50 without jumping forwards and backwards randomly.

For the second successive quarter, 180 flights by Finnair's A330 and A350 fleets (out of an airline total of 905) appear not to have been taken into account in calculating the results, with only its narrow-body A320 family flights having been counted.
All of Finnair's widebody flights now appear to have been considered in the revised results.

As I've noted in previous posts, you couldn't make this up, but at least we now know who has.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 19:18
  #934 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: London
Posts: 262
Does LHR no longer do runway switches at 3pm? I observed planes taking off from 09R this morning and still the planes are taking off from 09R tonight

Plus - How many slots are there destined for Flybe??? It seems every time I check the news they are landing more slots. Can LHR really accommodate so many Q400 (78 seat!) slots without compromising on efficiency?
Sharklet_321 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 19:23
  #935 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: norn iron
Posts: 1,112
They donít alternate when on easterlies; or at least they didnít when I worked there some years ago.
cuthere is online now  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 21:27
  #936 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 408
They do not alternate on easterlies, and have not since the mid 50ís when jets first arrived, its the Cranford agreement, withdrawn in 2010.
HAL submitted plans to Hillingdon council who refused, HAL appealed, they were granted. HAL reneged on its own application and deferred to R3 completion saving themselves £millions. Therefore 18hrs continuous noise on the runways, and you trust them to build a new runway taking account of public interest?
Trinity 09L is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2019, 07:54
  #937 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 10,886
Originally Posted by Sharklet_321 View Post
Does LHR no longer do runway switches at 3pm? I observed planes taking off from 09R this morning and still the planes are taking off from 09R tonight
LHR Runway Alternation
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2019, 08:39
  #938 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: London
Posts: 262
Thanks all!
Sharklet_321 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 22:16
  #939 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 3,661
Jet Airways slots

Those who have been following the news about Jet will be aware that international flying is currently suspended. Furthermore with news today that emergency funding will not be available from banks, the likelihood of their resuming flying from Heathrow in the near future seems unlikely

Jet were leasing 3 daily slot pairs from an airline in the UAE who shall remain nameless. While it is possible the new rotations could begin soon, the fact that the UAE based airline has recently been shrinking rather than growing suggest new flights are maybe unlikely - at most 1 additional flight per day. That leaves at least 2 slot pairs per day which need to be either used or lost - leasing them out (or a sale) seems the most likely option.

Jet had departures from LHR to India at 0930, 2010 and 2120 in UK summer time. The flights to the UAE are at 0935, 1500 and 2045. With a forced seller, the buyer can afford to bid a little lower than they might do otherwise. Clearly the 2 evening slots will appeal to Asian carriers, while the morning slot may interest North American operators. Who apart from BA can find a way to use these slots at short notice, is cash rich, and would be prepared to pay what the seller would likely want as a price ?
davidjohnson6 is online now  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 22:49
  #940 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 38
Posts: 423
AUH-LHR is now 4 daily on certain days as a B789 rotation has been added.

Anyone know what happens to the slots Air Canada would have used for YHZ and YYT? They won’t be operating until the B737 MAX gets flying again, the daytime AC868 has already beed retimed.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.