Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Manchester-2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th May 2019, 08:47
  #3041 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,489
Received 147 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by inOban
I'd never seen the word sortation before it appeared in earlier posts. Much worse than deplane.
Me neither, just had to look it up as it has appeared again in the posts above.
At least its in the dictionary. But so is de-p***e.
Sortation-meaning
TURIN is online now  
Old 11th May 2019, 17:57
  #3042 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nighthawk117
While I agree that what Scotland needs is a single, central belt airport, I dont think it would make much difference here. The main market for this flight is inbound Chinese tourists, many of which tend to book as part of a package tour. What airport they fly in to is irrelevant - as they'll be boarding a pre-booked bus and will be whisked off to the first of their many destinations - probably Edinburgh to start anyway, then on to other destinations around Scotland.

Any business travel, or Scottish tourists heading to Beijing will just be a happy extra, but certainly not the main market for this flight. As such, I don't think a single central airport would make much difference in this case.

As for the United / Delta examples - i'm not convinced. Look at Manchester, with its much larger catchment, yet it's still narrowbody central to the US. With the exception of the United flight which upgraded this year, it's all 757s. These aircraft are perfect for operating flights to the UK, freeing up widebodies for flights further in to Europe.
I cannot think of any narrow body flights to the U.S. from Manchester. You are very out of date.

it's A330 and 747 to Atlanta and New York in combinations and A330 to the remaining airports of Boston, Las Vegas and LA.
boredintheairport is offline  
Old 11th May 2019, 19:02
  #3043 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MANCHESTER has just two US carrier operated flights a day since Delta seceded Atlanta and JFK to their UK branch with a mix of A332 AND 744 aircraft .

UNITED are operating daily Newark on a refurbished 763 at the moment whilst American have canned JFK (an ongoing process from them in dehubbing New York to focus on a very few major O&D markets) and as of this month reduced capacity on their remaining Philadelphia daily having switched to a now rather old and on its last legs 763 operation though the summer. It’s supposed to switch to a 788 Dreamliner later in the year however I await with baited breath as these are in short supply and mostly at Chicago right now.



Rutan16 is offline  
Old 11th May 2019, 20:29
  #3044 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by boredintheairport
I cannot think of any narrow body flights to the U.S. from Manchester. You are very out of date.

it's A330 and 747 to Atlanta and New York in combinations and A330 to the remaining airports of Boston, Las Vegas and LA.
I believe recently United ended the last 757 flight to Manchester and replaced it with a 767 300/400 to operate the Newark route. Manchester is now all widebody across the Atlantic including Canada.
PDXCWL45 is offline  
Old 13th May 2019, 09:44
  #3045 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,489
Received 147 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by Rutan16
MANCHESTER has just two US carrier operated flights a day since Delta seceded Atlanta and JFK to their UK branch with a mix of A332 AND 744 aircraft .

UNITED are operating daily Newark on a refurbished 763 at the moment whilst American have canned JFK (an ongoing process from them in dehubbing New York to focus on a very few major O&D markets) and as of this month reduced capacity on their remaining Philadelphia daily having switched to a now rather old and on its last legs 763 operation though the summer. It’s supposed to switch to a 788 Dreamliner later in the year however I await with baited breath as these are in short supply and mostly at Chicago right now.



The 787 has been pushed back to January 2020.
TURIN is online now  
Old 14th May 2019, 08:12
  #3046 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cathay Pacific HKG to stay A350-1000 Year round instead of reducing to W19/20 A350-900
CabinCrewe is offline  
Old 14th May 2019, 09:07
  #3047 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 492
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I`ve noticed that they keep slipping the odd A350X already not June as they said as there is one in today
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 14th May 2019, 10:58
  #3048 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,560
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crew need to man the doors if refuelling so it's just easier to get them all off.
Pretty sure it's mandated under DfT rules that they need to reclear security before they can depart on a double drop run. It's why they really went out of fashion.Watched a 1/2 load on an Air Transat A330 sleepily troop off at Glasgow, go up a flight of stairs through gate security and then join the queue to reboard the same aircraft bound for MAN.
Skipness One Foxtrot is online now  
Old 14th May 2019, 16:15
  #3049 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CabinCrewe
Cathay Pacific HKG to stay A350-1000 Year round instead of reducing to W19/20 A350-900
incorrect, 1000 comes back on 1st Dec, before that the 900 operates.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 14th May 2019, 16:16
  #3050 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chaps1954
I`ve noticed that they keep slipping the odd A350X already not June as they said as there is one in today
It's whatever equipment is available, mostly changes are due to AOG's, the flt is still sold as a 900.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 15th May 2019, 20:25
  #3051 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manchester Statistics - March 2019

Destinations that are either new (no passengers since my records started in January 2005), or have not been served for a number of years - if the latter then the month and year of the last service is shown.

No new destinations were served in March 2019.

Million passenger routes (Rolling annual figures)
Amsterdam - 1,045,310 passengers

The following domestic statistics are missing from the CAA report for March.
Isle of Man does not appear in the initial report. In 2018 they had 13,938 passengers

Moving monthly and annual figures - based on CAA statistics/MAG statistics
Monthly passengers - 2,067,950 +3.38%
Annual Total - 5,659,146
Moving Annual Total - 28,657,684 +2.42%
Monthly Movements - 15,131 +0.74%
Annual Movements - 42.002
Moving Annual Movements - 201,680 -0.26%

Top 25 destinations - by passenger numbers


Top 25 destinations with highest percentage increase.


Figures for the European and long haul destinations that I consider to be the main points for our connecting traffic.



Comparison of top 25 destinations - March 2009 versus March 2019


Major changes to Domestic traffic

The CAA figure for Isle of Man is missing.
CAA statistics for March are provisional.
Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 16th May 2019, 05:22
  #3052 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
20 years.....end of.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...assengers.html
Navpi is offline  
Old 19th May 2019, 14:41
  #3053 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United kingdom
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just looked at flights on Ryanair to Frankfurt and unfortunately it appears like they will end the route from October.
Plane mad 134 is offline  
Old 19th May 2019, 17:30
  #3054 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 63
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No Fuel !

Lots of MAN flights diverting to BHX :-)
BHX5DME is offline  
Old 19th May 2019, 17:55
  #3055 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MCT
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Report here from the local rag

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co...rport-16299154

Suggested elsewhere that a power surge has disabled some or all of the fuelling system
Suzeman is offline  
Old 20th May 2019, 07:39
  #3056 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,548
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by boredintheairport
What about the other way around? For e.g. the Ethiopian Addis - Brussels - Manchester flight. Do passengers exit, clear security and re-board in Brussels?
That would deoend on how the Belgian authorities want to play it....it’s down to them as to whether a complete rescreened is required for transit passengers at one of their airports, not the UK’s DfT.

wiggy is offline  
Old 20th May 2019, 17:26
  #3057 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Icelandair will be using a Q400 of Air Iceland instead of the usual 757 for the next couple of days
GrahamK is offline  
Old 20th May 2019, 23:21
  #3058 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North, UK
Age: 67
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have just flown Prague - Brussels-Manchester thanks to last nights slight problem, I didn't have to go through security at Brussels between flights.
pwalhx is offline  
Old 21st May 2019, 00:24
  #3059 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: U.K.
Posts: 1,868
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The DfT here in the UK stipulate that everyone on an aircraft departing the UK must clear UK security. Hence the transiting SQ pax disembarking and clear security before re-boarding. If, for example, the SQ routes MAN-LHR-SIN then passengers wouldn't need to clear security in LHR because they have already been subjected to the UK security process. For those of you who connect with BA from MAN through LHR T5 you'll know that you don't clear security again because you cleared it in MAN. If you transfer to another LHR terminal you clear security again but presumably that is because you fall into the channel of other transferring pax from destinations outside the UK.

Within Europe there isn't always that stipulation and that is why in the parts of many European airports that service European flights, arriving and departing passengers mix.
easyflyer83 is offline  
Old 21st May 2019, 17:13
  #3060 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Near an airport
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
deplane

Originally Posted by TURIN
All passengers disembark (deplane isn't a word please stop using it). .
Deplane is a word in the USA is it not.
Check Mags On is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.