Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Manchester-2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Apr 2019, 20:53
  #2921 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Luton/Tenerife
Posts: 962
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pe ir is that where you go when amply watered.......
ericlday is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2019, 21:33
  #2922 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I type too fast for my own good
eggc is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 17:14
  #2923 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pegasus launching 5 weekly flights to SAW in July
Seljuk22 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 19:59
  #2924 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This week's update on the MANTP Project with Issue #85 of PlaneTalk which is kindly supplied by the MANTP Project Team.





























Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 21:55
  #2925 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The No Div notam has been renewed / extended from today until 18th April.
MANFOD is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 09:50
  #2926 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hearing that virgin 747s are currently not permitted to use the new pier due to air bridge issues. Heard that the airbridges design means they’re very close to putting a hole in the wing root, hopefully it’ll be a quick fix they can do
MANworker is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 13:11
  #2927 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tha A350 doesn’t fit either! Something to do with a slope! You couldn’t make this up!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 14:53
  #2928 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spannersatcx
Tha A350 doesn’t fit either! Something to do with a slope! You couldn’t make this up!
Actually, you could. It's called Brandenburg! Hopefully, this isn't a sequel and will just be teething issues.
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 15:05
  #2929 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spannersatcx
Tha A350 doesn’t fit either! Something to do with a slope! You couldn’t make this up!
Can we be a bit more specific about this and the B747 issue? Which gates are they supposed to fit and don't?
MANFOD is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 15:39
  #2930 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MANFOD
Can we be a bit more specific about this and the B747 issue? Which gates are they supposed to fit and don't?
in terms of actually fitting on the stand the 747 fits, but the air bridges are designed differently which means a part of it is very close to causing significant aircraft damage
MANworker is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 15:51
  #2931 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,541
Received 87 Likes on 59 Posts
Many, many years ago, my university professor used to encourage us all to buy his very big book on how to design an airport.

It had all sorts of interesting things in it - it's not rocket science...
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 15:59
  #2932 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: U.K.
Posts: 1,868
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Sounds more like an issue with the airbridge manufacturer. Who manufactures airbridge equipment that isn’t compatible with the Boeing 747?? Granted, numbers are reducing but it’s still a widely used aircraft around the world.
easyflyer83 is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 16:37
  #2933 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: bishops stortford herts
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably no 74`s at Sofia though as after declaring an interest in running Sofia Airport last year MAG confirms it has presented a bid in partnership with Chinese investment group BCEG with whom it also partners in development of Airport City Manchester.
southside bobby is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 21:01
  #2934 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MCT
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
Many, many years ago, my university professor used to encourage us all to buy his very big book on how to design an airport.

It had all sorts of interesting things in it - it's not rocket science...
Someone at Loughborough by any chance?
Suzeman is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 21:15
  #2935 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,541
Received 87 Likes on 59 Posts
Could be!!
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 21:22
  #2936 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MANFOD
Can we be a bit more specific about this and the B747 issue? Which gates are they supposed to fit and don't?
I’m told the 350 was trialled on 110, the airbridge wouldn’t get to the L2 door without hitting the engine and was 2 feet short of the L1 door. Was supposed to be trialled on 106 today but has been postponed until next week. L2 door is the preferred door so not everyone traipses through the business class section.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 21:37
  #2937 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 63
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jet Airways

Looks like Jet Airways days are numbered !
https://www.ndtv.com/business/jet-ai...ources-2021708


BHX5DME is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 23:18
  #2938 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit of a downward spiral down the plug hole, shame as they finished off with amazing loads in the high 90s%
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2019, 08:43
  #2939 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spannersatcx

I’m told the 350 was trialled on 110, the airbridge wouldn’t get to the L2 door without hitting the engine and was 2 feet short of the L1 door. Was supposed to be trialled on 106 today but has been postponed until next week. L2 door is the preferred door so not everyone traipses through the business class section.
Artist's impression clearly shows a gap between the airbridge and the 747 on 106 and that's what they have delivered.

Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2019, 11:59
  #2940 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Uk
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst I admit it really isn't great, wont it in the long run not actually be a major problem, I say this because:
(I am in no way excusing the shoddiness of the situation, just looking at it from a different perspective)


1. Surely learning from pier 1, this wont be allowed to happen on pier 2/3.
2 There's surely going to be enough stands capable of handling the 747's from the existing T2 even whilst the second pier is getting built.
3. When pier 2/3 are built, isn't the likelihood that most VS will park in those two closer to the new lounges leaving pier 1 to Loco's/charters.
4. How many A350's, 747's etc, will be on the ground max at any one time? Wont there be enough stands in pier 2/3 to cope with these if the pier 1 issue can't be sorted? I know that's not the point but it should be manageable right?
azz767 is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.