Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Southampton-2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2019, 23:36
  #1781 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were complaints before the cargo started and like SOU SEN also have a ban on overnight passengers flights. Never under estimate the residents when they kick off. The council will be mindful of public opinion unlike at Luton where the council owns the airport and doesn’t give a sh*t
LTNman is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2019, 06:26
  #1782 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 845
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
I dont think we can compare SEN anymore with SOU.
SEN now have 3 x FR 737-800's and 4 or more EZY A320's based there, plus other daily Airbus's coming in with Wizz starting up, & Air Malta etc -
Stuff that SOU can only ever dream of...

Social media reports vocal objections at the recent roadshow.
It maybe now much harder to get PP through due to the increase in Climate, Noise, and Eco objections, especially after recent events with the climate warriors in London and at LCY.

SOU had opportunities years ago to get this PP through and they stalled it - That ship has now well and truly sailed, and it will likely be an uphill battle to convince planners and locals alike the benefits of the airport expansion now.

God help us now if the LHR 3rd runway starts any serious planning....
And LTN has had night flights in and out since the days of Autair BAC 1-11's going off at 02.00 hours, 3 of them at a time....LOL
rog747 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2019, 14:12
  #1783 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 50+ north
Posts: 1,253
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
There were complaints before the cargo started and like SOU SEN also have a ban on overnight passengers flights. Never under estimate the residents when they kick off. The council will be mindful of public opinion unlike at Luton where the council owns the airport and doesn’t give a sh*t
SOU has effectively an near total ban on flights after 2300, unless they are delayed schedules from earlier that day. No more than 10 per month are permitted.The starter extension is of course not going to change that.
TCAS FAN is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2019, 15:11
  #1784 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southampton
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TCAS FAN
Given work is underway in Marlhill copse for aerodrome safeguarding,will this have any significant improvements to RW20 takeoff restrictions.
Interesting times with the planning permission soon,but I read it might meet huge opposition given the environmental climate!
RW20 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2019, 15:32
  #1785 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 50+ north
Posts: 1,253
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RW20
TCAS FAN
Given work is underway in Marlhill copse for aerodrome safeguarding,will this have any significant improvements to RW20 takeoff restrictions.
Interesting times with the planning permission soon,but I read it might meet huge opposition given the environmental climate!
Yes a very positive impact. I don't have specific performance figures for current types using SOU but when the E145s first arrived I worked closely with their operator to improve performance by removing obstacles. Was successful with removing redundant poles from the railcard on north end, Marhill Close was the holy grail that Bl***y Awful Airports Plc never had the will to pursue. For the E145 reduction of tree height was worth up to 3 tonnes extra take off weight.

It will take about 3-4 months for the improvements to be useable. Once the work is completed the airport's surveyors will need to verify the new obstacle environment, then submit details to NATS who will then produce and publish new Type A charts.
TCAS FAN is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2019, 15:45
  #1786 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southampton
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TCAS FAN
As always a clear analysis of the ongoing operations .Its clear that the airport owners and management have been woeful in the development potential of the airport up to know. Indeed the present institution seem to be similar,time will tell,but is it to late?
RW20 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2019, 09:42
  #1787 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 43
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rog747
I dont think we can compare SEN anymore with SOU.
SEN now have 3 x FR 737-800's and 4 or more EZY A320's based there, plus other daily Airbus's coming in with Wizz starting up, & Air Malta etc -
Stuff that SOU can only ever dream of...

Social media reports vocal objections at the recent roadshow.
It maybe now much harder to get PP through due to the increase in Climate, Noise, and Eco objections, especially after recent events with the climate warriors in London and at LCY.

SOU had opportunities years ago to get this PP through and they stalled it - That ship has now well and truly sailed, and it will likely be an uphill battle to convince planners and locals alike the benefits of the airport expansion now.

God help us now if the LHR 3rd runway starts any serious planning....
And LTN has had night flights in and out since the days of Autair BAC 1-11's going off at 02.00 hours, 3 of them at a time....LOL
You are comparing post development SEN with pre development SOU? We absolutely can compare the two airports, not only are they very similar in a lot of ways, but more importantly, they represent opportunities for airlines to keep growing outside the congested big London airports. The airlines need these airports as much as the airports need them. also, don’t forget that the original 2005 master plan did not feature a runway extension from memory. Why might the need for an extension now be necessary? Why would a pension fun owned airport loosen the purse strings without a guaranteed reward? It all points to a low cost operator already being in the wings.

as to the environmental bollocks, I suppose the whole of London should grind to a standstill including all its airports because some unemployed people are pretending they care about the environment because it’s currently fashionable to do so? The extension will pass through planning as long as it meets all the necessary legal requirements, which judging by the thorough process SOU is going through, it will. Nothing would ever get built if residents and environmentalists had their way, they contribute only a very small part to any proper argument against planning being given.

My only concern is that there is no mention of the terminal upgrades, which presumably are to follow at a later date under a separate planning permission. I really do think they need to expand the security, baggage handling etc before servicing more large jets. The odd one they service now always seems to be on the ground for an unusually long amount of time.
Rivet Joint is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2019, 10:05
  #1788 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rivet Joint


You are comparing post development SEN with pre development SOU? We absolutely can compare the two airports, not only are they very similar in a lot of ways, but more importantly, they represent opportunities for airlines to keep growing outside the congested big London airports. The airlines need these airports as much as the airports need them. also, don’t forget that the original 2005 master plan did not feature a runway extension from memory. Why might the need for an extension now be necessary? Why would a pension fun owned airport loosen the purse strings without a guaranteed reward? It all points to a low cost operator already being in the wings.

as to the environmental bollocks, I suppose the whole of London should grind to a standstill including all its airports because some unemployed people are pretending they care about the environment because it’s currently fashionable to do so? The extension will pass through planning as long as it meets all the necessary legal requirements, which judging by the thorough process SOU is going through, it will. Nothing would ever get built if residents and environmentalists had their way, they contribute only a very small part to any proper argument against planning being given.

My only concern is that there is no mention of the terminal upgrades, which presumably are to follow at a later date under a separate planning permission. I really do think they need to expand the security, baggage handling etc before servicing more large jets. The odd one they service now always seems to be on the ground for an unusually long amount of time.
Think I read Rivet that there will only be minimal upgrades to the terminal in this phase not requiring planning. Let’s get the airfield infrastructure up and running and a LCC in first!
stewyb is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2019, 11:05
  #1789 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 845
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
RJ and Stewy -

I hear what you say about the comparisons and agree to much of what you both have aforementioned, thanks.

But as to the ''environmental bollocks'' - I'm afraid in this ''eco-age'' nowadays, we will see more and more vociferous objections and pro-action being taken -
As to how that may affect SOU remains to be seen.
I trust it will not impede plans, but we cannot shy away from the facts that Aviation is becoming rather more a tetchy subject with the likes of planners and public.
rog747 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2019, 21:15
  #1790 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Planning application was submitted to the council last week!
SKOJB is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2019, 07:40
  #1791 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Southampton
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SKOJB
Planning application was submitted to the council last week!
Is currently nothing in the way of an application on the EBC webite??
Dropoffcharge is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2019, 07:52
  #1792 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Southampton
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rog747
RJ and Stewy -
But as to the ''environmental bollocks'' - I'm afraid in this ''eco-age'' nowadays, we will see more and more vociferous objections and pro-action being taken -
As to how that may affect SOU remains to be seen.
I trust it will not impede plans, but we cannot shy away from the facts that Aviation is becoming rather more a tetchy subject with the likes of planners and public.
Exactly that, it's also worth noting that EBC themselves declared an "Environmental and Climate Emergency" in July of this year, so any application will be met by strong opposition on this reason alone.
Dropoffcharge is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2019, 08:05
  #1793 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 845
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by SKOJB
Planning application was submitted to the council last week!
From SOU MD 5 days ago -
A planning application which, if successful, will enable this is in the process of being submitted to Eastleigh Borough Council and is due to go live for public consultation in November...
Not being pedantic but that to me means they are still tuning up for the show....

The Q&A read is worth a peek - scroll down
https://www.southamptonairport.com/m...nwayextension/
rog747 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2019, 05:45
  #1794 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 845
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
More Public SOU master plan consultation open days announced for New Forest residents.

Flybe's new owners Virgin Connect have hinted they are intending to replace the Dash 8

Plus the chief executive Mark Anderson said the airline could stop flying between regional airports where the journey can be made easily by train or car due to climate reasons -
Well that's a great start for SOU then, plus a bit of an own goal for VC in ''Flight shaming'' themselves.
Goodness, the Eco movements are so going to love that one LOL
rog747 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2019, 07:03
  #1795 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waters edge
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rog747
More Public SOU master plan consultation open days announced for New Forest residents.

Flybe's new owners Virgin Connect have hinted they are intending to replace the Dash 8

Plus the chief executive Mark Anderson said the airline could stop flying between regional airports where the journey can be made easily by train or car due to climate reasons -
Well that's a great start for SOU then, plus a bit of an own goal for VC in ''Flight shaming'' themselves.
Goodness, the Eco movements are so going to love that one LOL
I attended the conference at which the Flybe CEO was asked about new aircraft. The remarks he made were in context of serving LHR and feeding Virgin Atlantic. The Virgin CEO also spoke about an enlarged role at LHR for their new acquisition (VC). Nothing was said about dates other than that LHR expect R3 at end 2026, Virgin 2030 and Emirates 2035 if ever.

FF

Flitefone is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2019, 07:29
  #1796 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Southampton
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They can’t submit any application until they run the consultation events and write up a Statement of Community Involvement - if they don’t do that it would be refused straight away. Nowadays 90% of the work is done before the submission of the formal application to avoid delays because of government targets blah blah following the embarrassment of the Heathrow T5 inquiry.
Soton27 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2019, 14:24
  #1797 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 845
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Just wondered if FLYBE have dumped SOU-VRN next Summer?

Inghams Holidays shows they fly on WEDS and SATS for their package holidays to Lake Garda
Flt nos. BE1223/1224 but are these charters then?

Thanks R.
rog747 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2019, 15:08
  #1798 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rog747
Just wondered if FLYBE have dumped SOU-VRN next Summer?

Inghams Holidays shows they fly on WEDS and SATS for their package holidays to Lake Garda
Flt nos. BE1223/1224 but are these charters then?

Thanks R.
Guess we will find out eventually when they release summer 2020!
PDXCWL45 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2019, 15:26
  #1799 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PDXCWL45
Guess we will find out eventually when they release summer 2020!
certainly taking their time!
stewyb is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2019, 15:26
  #1800 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 845
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by PDXCWL45
Guess we will find out eventually when they release summer 2020!
Apologies and thanks - I duly thought that Summer 20 was already on sale by now.
rog747 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.